Does the 2019 UA Artificer's Many-Handed Pouch infusion enable unlimited infinite-range cross-planar communication?How can I send long messages over long distances?How rare would a set of bags of holding/portable holes that share the same interior space be?Deck of Many Things vs. Forced DreamIt seems like every skill check should always be made with advantage due to the 'Working Together' rules. Is this accurate?How much should a weapon property akin to the armor property Wild cost?To cast Find the Path, can a caster substitute an object from the location they wish to find with a component pouch?How do I cost out a homebew magic item: Mutex Bag Of Holding?Is the saving throw bonus when carrying a Night Hag’s Heartstone optional or required?Can you take different archetype options at different levels?Party split into two: how do I bring them together?Does the 2019 UA artificer's Arcane Weapon spell apply to thrown weapons?Pathfinder warbow concept review

Is it ethical to cite a reviewer's papers even if they are rather irrelevant?

Placement of positioning lights on A320 winglets

Can I get a photo of an Ancient Arrow?

A flower's head or heart?

DBCC SHRINKFILE on the distribution database

Past vs. present tense when referring to a fictional character

How can I find out about the game world without meta-influencing it?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

What game uses dice with compass point arrows, forbidden signs, explosions, arrows and targeting reticles?

Interview was just a one hour panel. Got an offer the next day; do I accept or is this a red flag?

Can Dive Down protect a creature against Pacifism?

Would a character with eternal youth be AL-compliant?

Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it

Why not make one big cpu core?

Optimising matrix generation time

Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?

What's the reason for the decade jump in the recent X-Men trilogy?

Can artificial satellite positions affect tides?

Has JSON.serialize suppressApexObjectNulls ever worked?

I sent an angry e-mail to my interviewers about a conflict at my home institution. Could this affect my application?

Jam with honey & without pectin has a saucy consistency always

Should I move out from my current apartment before the contract ends to save more money?

Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship

Why is Skinner so awkward in Hot Fuzz?



Does the 2019 UA Artificer's Many-Handed Pouch infusion enable unlimited infinite-range cross-planar communication?


How can I send long messages over long distances?How rare would a set of bags of holding/portable holes that share the same interior space be?Deck of Many Things vs. Forced DreamIt seems like every skill check should always be made with advantage due to the 'Working Together' rules. Is this accurate?How much should a weapon property akin to the armor property Wild cost?To cast Find the Path, can a caster substitute an object from the location they wish to find with a component pouch?How do I cost out a homebew magic item: Mutex Bag Of Holding?Is the saving throw bonus when carrying a Night Hag’s Heartstone optional or required?Can you take different archetype options at different levels?Party split into two: how do I bring them together?Does the 2019 UA artificer's Arcane Weapon spell apply to thrown weapons?Pathfinder warbow concept review






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


One of the available infusions available to the Unearthed Arcana Artificer (2019) is called the Many-Handed Pouch, which links up to 5 pouches to the same extra-dimensional space (emphasis added):




The infused pouches all share one interdimensional space of the same capacity as a single pouch. Thus, reaching into any of the pouches allows access to the same storage space. A pouch operates as long as it is within 100 miles of another one of the pouches; the pouch is otherwise empty and won’t accept any contents.




At first glance, it seems like the clause in bold limits the magic of the pouches to a range of 100 miles. However, things are not quite so simple. If I were to infuse 4 pouches and then keep a pair for myself while giving the other pair to someone else, then every pouch will always be within 100 miles of another pouch, which seems to imply that every pouch will continue to function. (Other similar variations are possible as well, but this example demonstrates the principle.) Even if the other person were to travel to another plane, nothing in the wording seems to indicate that the pouches will stop working.



Hence, at any time, one of us can write a note and put it in the pouch, where the other one can find and read it. Compared to spells, this seems to be roughly on par with the 5th-level spell Dream when used for the purposes of communication. (For example, Dream doesn't work across planes, but can target anyone rather than just the holder of the other pair of pouches.) And that's before considering the non-communication uses of the infusion. A more direct comparison would be a pair of sending stones with unlimited uses.



When read in this way, it seems quite a bit more powerful than what should normally be available to a 4th-level character. It also seems like a non-standard use of the infusion to keep the pouches in pairs rather than handing out one pouch per person.



Is this an allowed use of this infusion as written, or have I missed something that would prevent it from working in this way?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Jun 6 at 19:26

















8












$begingroup$


One of the available infusions available to the Unearthed Arcana Artificer (2019) is called the Many-Handed Pouch, which links up to 5 pouches to the same extra-dimensional space (emphasis added):




The infused pouches all share one interdimensional space of the same capacity as a single pouch. Thus, reaching into any of the pouches allows access to the same storage space. A pouch operates as long as it is within 100 miles of another one of the pouches; the pouch is otherwise empty and won’t accept any contents.




At first glance, it seems like the clause in bold limits the magic of the pouches to a range of 100 miles. However, things are not quite so simple. If I were to infuse 4 pouches and then keep a pair for myself while giving the other pair to someone else, then every pouch will always be within 100 miles of another pouch, which seems to imply that every pouch will continue to function. (Other similar variations are possible as well, but this example demonstrates the principle.) Even if the other person were to travel to another plane, nothing in the wording seems to indicate that the pouches will stop working.



Hence, at any time, one of us can write a note and put it in the pouch, where the other one can find and read it. Compared to spells, this seems to be roughly on par with the 5th-level spell Dream when used for the purposes of communication. (For example, Dream doesn't work across planes, but can target anyone rather than just the holder of the other pair of pouches.) And that's before considering the non-communication uses of the infusion. A more direct comparison would be a pair of sending stones with unlimited uses.



When read in this way, it seems quite a bit more powerful than what should normally be available to a 4th-level character. It also seems like a non-standard use of the infusion to keep the pouches in pairs rather than handing out one pouch per person.



Is this an allowed use of this infusion as written, or have I missed something that would prevent it from working in this way?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Jun 6 at 19:26













8












8








8





$begingroup$


One of the available infusions available to the Unearthed Arcana Artificer (2019) is called the Many-Handed Pouch, which links up to 5 pouches to the same extra-dimensional space (emphasis added):




The infused pouches all share one interdimensional space of the same capacity as a single pouch. Thus, reaching into any of the pouches allows access to the same storage space. A pouch operates as long as it is within 100 miles of another one of the pouches; the pouch is otherwise empty and won’t accept any contents.




At first glance, it seems like the clause in bold limits the magic of the pouches to a range of 100 miles. However, things are not quite so simple. If I were to infuse 4 pouches and then keep a pair for myself while giving the other pair to someone else, then every pouch will always be within 100 miles of another pouch, which seems to imply that every pouch will continue to function. (Other similar variations are possible as well, but this example demonstrates the principle.) Even if the other person were to travel to another plane, nothing in the wording seems to indicate that the pouches will stop working.



Hence, at any time, one of us can write a note and put it in the pouch, where the other one can find and read it. Compared to spells, this seems to be roughly on par with the 5th-level spell Dream when used for the purposes of communication. (For example, Dream doesn't work across planes, but can target anyone rather than just the holder of the other pair of pouches.) And that's before considering the non-communication uses of the infusion. A more direct comparison would be a pair of sending stones with unlimited uses.



When read in this way, it seems quite a bit more powerful than what should normally be available to a 4th-level character. It also seems like a non-standard use of the infusion to keep the pouches in pairs rather than handing out one pouch per person.



Is this an allowed use of this infusion as written, or have I missed something that would prevent it from working in this way?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




One of the available infusions available to the Unearthed Arcana Artificer (2019) is called the Many-Handed Pouch, which links up to 5 pouches to the same extra-dimensional space (emphasis added):




The infused pouches all share one interdimensional space of the same capacity as a single pouch. Thus, reaching into any of the pouches allows access to the same storage space. A pouch operates as long as it is within 100 miles of another one of the pouches; the pouch is otherwise empty and won’t accept any contents.




At first glance, it seems like the clause in bold limits the magic of the pouches to a range of 100 miles. However, things are not quite so simple. If I were to infuse 4 pouches and then keep a pair for myself while giving the other pair to someone else, then every pouch will always be within 100 miles of another pouch, which seems to imply that every pouch will continue to function. (Other similar variations are possible as well, but this example demonstrates the principle.) Even if the other person were to travel to another plane, nothing in the wording seems to indicate that the pouches will stop working.



Hence, at any time, one of us can write a note and put it in the pouch, where the other one can find and read it. Compared to spells, this seems to be roughly on par with the 5th-level spell Dream when used for the purposes of communication. (For example, Dream doesn't work across planes, but can target anyone rather than just the holder of the other pair of pouches.) And that's before considering the non-communication uses of the infusion. A more direct comparison would be a pair of sending stones with unlimited uses.



When read in this way, it seems quite a bit more powerful than what should normally be available to a 4th-level character. It also seems like a non-standard use of the infusion to keep the pouches in pairs rather than handing out one pouch per person.



Is this an allowed use of this infusion as written, or have I missed something that would prevent it from working in this way?







dnd-5e magic-items unearthed-arcana artificer






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 7 at 4:25







Ryan Thompson

















asked Jun 6 at 19:25









Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson

14.4k249109




14.4k249109











  • $begingroup$
    Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Jun 6 at 19:26
















  • $begingroup$
    Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Jun 6 at 19:26















$begingroup$
Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Jun 6 at 19:26




$begingroup$
Potentially relevant questions: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/142120/…; rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/120526/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Jun 6 at 19:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Strictly as written, your read of its abilities is correct.



The line about distance doesn't apply if two pairs of pouches are very far apart from each other.



With the distance clause, though we can make some well-educated guesses about the intended mechanics of the pouch:

The likely intention is that pouches must be near to other pouches (1), but can be chained (2)(3) - so having all five pouches precisely 100 miles apart could send a small item 400 miles instantly.



  1. pouches are clearly stated to work when near another pouch


  2. pouches are stated to work when near another one pouch, not near
    every pouch


  3. pouches being easy no-resource ultra-long-distance communication is
    an outlier in terms of power level compared to other infusions, and
    is probably not intended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149437%2fdoes-the-2019-ua-artificers-many-handed-pouch-infusion-enable-unlimited-infinit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

Strictly as written, your read of its abilities is correct.



The line about distance doesn't apply if two pairs of pouches are very far apart from each other.



With the distance clause, though we can make some well-educated guesses about the intended mechanics of the pouch:

The likely intention is that pouches must be near to other pouches (1), but can be chained (2)(3) - so having all five pouches precisely 100 miles apart could send a small item 400 miles instantly.



  1. pouches are clearly stated to work when near another pouch


  2. pouches are stated to work when near another one pouch, not near
    every pouch


  3. pouches being easy no-resource ultra-long-distance communication is
    an outlier in terms of power level compared to other infusions, and
    is probably not intended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    2 days ago















12












$begingroup$

Strictly as written, your read of its abilities is correct.



The line about distance doesn't apply if two pairs of pouches are very far apart from each other.



With the distance clause, though we can make some well-educated guesses about the intended mechanics of the pouch:

The likely intention is that pouches must be near to other pouches (1), but can be chained (2)(3) - so having all five pouches precisely 100 miles apart could send a small item 400 miles instantly.



  1. pouches are clearly stated to work when near another pouch


  2. pouches are stated to work when near another one pouch, not near
    every pouch


  3. pouches being easy no-resource ultra-long-distance communication is
    an outlier in terms of power level compared to other infusions, and
    is probably not intended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    2 days ago













12












12








12





$begingroup$

Strictly as written, your read of its abilities is correct.



The line about distance doesn't apply if two pairs of pouches are very far apart from each other.



With the distance clause, though we can make some well-educated guesses about the intended mechanics of the pouch:

The likely intention is that pouches must be near to other pouches (1), but can be chained (2)(3) - so having all five pouches precisely 100 miles apart could send a small item 400 miles instantly.



  1. pouches are clearly stated to work when near another pouch


  2. pouches are stated to work when near another one pouch, not near
    every pouch


  3. pouches being easy no-resource ultra-long-distance communication is
    an outlier in terms of power level compared to other infusions, and
    is probably not intended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Strictly as written, your read of its abilities is correct.



The line about distance doesn't apply if two pairs of pouches are very far apart from each other.



With the distance clause, though we can make some well-educated guesses about the intended mechanics of the pouch:

The likely intention is that pouches must be near to other pouches (1), but can be chained (2)(3) - so having all five pouches precisely 100 miles apart could send a small item 400 miles instantly.



  1. pouches are clearly stated to work when near another pouch


  2. pouches are stated to work when near another one pouch, not near
    every pouch


  3. pouches being easy no-resource ultra-long-distance communication is
    an outlier in terms of power level compared to other infusions, and
    is probably not intended.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 6 at 19:48









Rubiksmoose

68.1k11332489




68.1k11332489










answered Jun 6 at 19:45









SpeedkatSpeedkat

5,1391038




5,1391038











  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
2 days ago




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, I've spent some time thinking about how to express a rule that ensures that each pouch only works while "connected" to other pouches, but I think that might be equivalent to designing an algorithm for distributed database consistency. So I can't really blame them too much for using a simple-but-exploitable rule for when the pouches do or don't work.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
2 days ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149437%2fdoes-the-2019-ua-artificers-many-handed-pouch-infusion-enable-unlimited-infinit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?