What happens when a ghost uses the “Possess” action on a victim of an intellect devourer?Can I resurrect a corpse that has been animated?What are the unintended or dangerous consequences of allowing spells that target and damage creatures to also target and damage corpses?Can a ghost attack with a weapon attuned to the creature it possesses?What happens when a creature possessed by an intellect devourer is true polymorphed?Do humanoid undead or constructs have a soul for Magic Jar?Death Ward and the Intellect Devourer's “Body Thief”Shapechanged into an intellect devourerProtection from Evil and Good and Intellect DevourerWhat happens to a Ghost when the Possessed creature polymorphs?What happens to a Ghost when the Possessed creature's polymorphed form reaches 0 HP?Can an intellect devourer use Devour Intellect while it inhabits a creature's body?Can I use a Magic Jar to share a body?

Impossible darts scores

Links to webpages in books

Can Ogre clerics use Purify Food and Drink on humanoid characters?

How to make clear to people I don't want to answer their "Where are you from?" question?

How much will studying magic in an academy cost?

How does a blind passenger not die, if driver becomes unconscious

How dangerous are set-size assumptions?

Interaction between Leyline of Anticipation and Teferi, Time Raveler

STM Microcontroller burns every time

Inverse-quotes-quine

Why is the high-pass filter result in a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) downsampled?

Fedora boot screen shows both Fedora logo and Lenovo logo. Why and How?

Why doesn't a marching band have strings?

Archery in modern conflicts

How do I turn off a repeating trade?

Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board

Gas usage for same contract is constantly growing

Can ADFS connect to other SSO services?

In the Marvel universe, can a human have a baby with any non-human?

Accidentals and ties

What does "play with your toy’s toys" mean?

How would modern naval warfare have to have developed differently for battleships to still be relevant in the 21st century?

Why do all the teams that I have worked with always finish a sprint without completion of all the stories?

Require advice on power conservation for backpacking trip



What happens when a ghost uses the “Possess” action on a victim of an intellect devourer?


Can I resurrect a corpse that has been animated?What are the unintended or dangerous consequences of allowing spells that target and damage creatures to also target and damage corpses?Can a ghost attack with a weapon attuned to the creature it possesses?What happens when a creature possessed by an intellect devourer is true polymorphed?Do humanoid undead or constructs have a soul for Magic Jar?Death Ward and the Intellect Devourer's “Body Thief”Shapechanged into an intellect devourerProtection from Evil and Good and Intellect DevourerWhat happens to a Ghost when the Possessed creature polymorphs?What happens to a Ghost when the Possessed creature's polymorphed form reaches 0 HP?Can an intellect devourer use Devour Intellect while it inhabits a creature's body?Can I use a Magic Jar to share a body?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








13












$begingroup$


The intellect devourer's Body Thief action states that the Intellect devourer "takes control of the target's body." We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature.



The ghost's Possession action states "The ghost now controls the body but doesn't deprive the target of awareness."



So does the ghost override the intellect devourer to control the humanoid in question?



Also, in terms of the Charisma save, would the save automatically fail since the target is ultimately the humanoid, or would the intellect devourer attempt the save with its own Charisma to try and maintain control of the body?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Jun 14 at 1:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 3:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    Jun 14 at 3:56










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    Jun 14 at 11:52

















13












$begingroup$


The intellect devourer's Body Thief action states that the Intellect devourer "takes control of the target's body." We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature.



The ghost's Possession action states "The ghost now controls the body but doesn't deprive the target of awareness."



So does the ghost override the intellect devourer to control the humanoid in question?



Also, in terms of the Charisma save, would the save automatically fail since the target is ultimately the humanoid, or would the intellect devourer attempt the save with its own Charisma to try and maintain control of the body?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Jun 14 at 1:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 3:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    Jun 14 at 3:56










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    Jun 14 at 11:52













13












13








13


1



$begingroup$


The intellect devourer's Body Thief action states that the Intellect devourer "takes control of the target's body." We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature.



The ghost's Possession action states "The ghost now controls the body but doesn't deprive the target of awareness."



So does the ghost override the intellect devourer to control the humanoid in question?



Also, in terms of the Charisma save, would the save automatically fail since the target is ultimately the humanoid, or would the intellect devourer attempt the save with its own Charisma to try and maintain control of the body?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The intellect devourer's Body Thief action states that the Intellect devourer "takes control of the target's body." We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature.



The ghost's Possession action states "The ghost now controls the body but doesn't deprive the target of awareness."



So does the ghost override the intellect devourer to control the humanoid in question?



Also, in terms of the Charisma save, would the save automatically fail since the target is ultimately the humanoid, or would the intellect devourer attempt the save with its own Charisma to try and maintain control of the body?







dnd-5e monsters undead possession






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 14 at 1:37









V2Blast

30.8k5 gold badges115 silver badges188 bronze badges




30.8k5 gold badges115 silver badges188 bronze badges










asked Jun 14 at 1:21









LumenbeingLumenbeing

8685 silver badges12 bronze badges




8685 silver badges12 bronze badges







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Jun 14 at 1:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 3:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    Jun 14 at 3:56










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    Jun 14 at 11:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Jun 14 at 1:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 3:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
    $endgroup$
    – Seidr
    Jun 14 at 3:56










  • $begingroup$
    Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    Jun 14 at 11:52







1




1




$begingroup$
As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jun 14 at 1:38




$begingroup$
As your "bonus question" is substantially different from your original one (and might have a distinct answer), I've edited it out of the post. You're welcome to ask it separately. :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Jun 14 at 1:38












$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 3:04




$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 3:04




1




1




$begingroup$
It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Jun 14 at 3:56




$begingroup$
It seems to me that the removed "bonus question" could be answered just as easily by the same explanation of the mechanics of the Body Thief ability since it seems like the question is based on a misunderstanding of how Body Thief actually works.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Jun 14 at 3:56












$begingroup$
Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
Jun 14 at 11:52




$begingroup$
Alright, so, a Ghost possesses a human, then an Intellect Devourer chomps the brain, making it a corpse, then a Dybbuk hops into the corpse. Body Party!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
Jun 14 at 11:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Yes, the possession does override the intellect devourer and the intellect devourer would most likely want to abandon ship at that point, but could technically choose to stay along for the ride for a while to keep from being exposed. When the target dies, both the ghost and the intellect devourer would be forced out.



In light of another answer challenging some of the basic assumptions listed in the OP, here are the reasons why an intellect devourer's host is a valid target for a ghost's Possession.



Possession only requires it's target to be a humanoid. It says nothing about being conscious or "having awareness to begin with. The other answer has questioned whether an intellect devourer's host still counts a creature, and further questioned that if it was in fact a creature, was it still a humanoid.



Okay, so what's a creature?



There is no technical definition of what constitutes a "creature" in the 5e books. Jeremy Crawford has tweeted that a creature is a "being" of one of the types listed in the Monster Manual introduction.



But wait, does it lose its creaturehood if its dead?



No. Let's look at the Resurrection spell.




You touch a dead creature that has been dead for no more than a
century, that didn't die of old age, and that isn't undead.




Right. So being dead does not stop a creature from being a creature otherwise there would be no such thing as a "dead creature". But this is all a moot point anyway because the host is explicitly NOT dead. According to the Body Thief description, the host body is still alive until the intellect devourer leaves or is driven out of the brain cavity of the host body. There is no "effectively dead" or "dead for all intents and purposes" here. The body, the creature (I covered that) is not dead.



But wait! Is it still a humanoid?



This is getting a little circular, but Jeremy Crawford tweeted the humanoid is a creature type and a creature is a humanoid if they are of that type.



A creature type is a statistic found in a creature's stat block. If only we had a stat block for an intellect devourer in a host.



In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist (p. 210), we have a stat block for




Meloon Wardragon, an NPC possessed by an intellect devourer. It lists him as "Medium Humanoid (human), neutral evil" and we see that he knows Deep Speech and has telepathy 60 ft.




Based on the text that follows his stat block, under the heading "Adjusted Game Statistics", we see that is he is restored to his old self, his alignment changes, and he loses the Deep Speech and the telepathy. It does not say that his creature type changes to humanoid. And it would, since other game effects clearly call those types of changes out.



Looking at this stat block, we can conclude that this NPC is a valid target for a Ghost's Possession attack because he has the humanoid creature type.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    Jun 14 at 9:44


















4












$begingroup$

There is effectively no humanoid the Ghost can target



The way that I am reading the Body Thief ability of the Intellect Devourer is that the brain is destroyed.



(Emphasis mine)




Body Thief. The intellect devourer initiates an Intelligence
contest with an incapacitated humanoid within 5 feet of it. If
it wins the contest, the intellect devourer magically consumes
the target's brain
, teleports into the target's skull, and takes
control of the target's body. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The brain is consumed by the Devourer, essentially leaving the body just a shell or a husk with a cavity left in the skull that the Devourer then resides in to control the husk of the former creature. This is further supported further down the description of the ability:




The intellect devourer is also forced out if the target regains its devoured brain by
means of a wish. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The Ghost's Possession ability reads as (emphasis mine):




One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. -Monster Manual pg. 147




The original creature no longer has control of it's body as it is, and is for all intents and purposes dead once the Devourer actually consumes the brain and assumes control of the body, so it could be reasoned that the Ghost wouldn't even be able to target it since it would no longer technically be a humanoid, just a human body being piloted by an Intellect Devourer which cannot be possessed by a ghost.



While the Ghost would not "deprive the target of awareness", the target effectively no longer exists even if it could somehow possess the body and so has no awareness to be deprived.




"We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature."




While the body is still alive due it later saying the body dies if the Devourer leaves, it doesn't say that the body itself still counts as a creature even though you could infer that. And even if it were a creature, it wouldn't necessarily count as a humanoid since it is basically a mech suit made of meat that contains the Devourer.



The last sentence of Body Thief reads:




The body then dies, unless its brain is restored within 1 round. -Monster Manual pg. 191




It doesn't actually state that the "creature" the Devourer targeted dies, just the body dies. This would imply that the creature is effectively dead the moment the brain is consumed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:30






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
    $endgroup$
    – hajef
    Jun 14 at 10:30













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149908%2fwhat-happens-when-a-ghost-uses-the-possess-action-on-a-victim-of-an-intellect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

Yes, the possession does override the intellect devourer and the intellect devourer would most likely want to abandon ship at that point, but could technically choose to stay along for the ride for a while to keep from being exposed. When the target dies, both the ghost and the intellect devourer would be forced out.



In light of another answer challenging some of the basic assumptions listed in the OP, here are the reasons why an intellect devourer's host is a valid target for a ghost's Possession.



Possession only requires it's target to be a humanoid. It says nothing about being conscious or "having awareness to begin with. The other answer has questioned whether an intellect devourer's host still counts a creature, and further questioned that if it was in fact a creature, was it still a humanoid.



Okay, so what's a creature?



There is no technical definition of what constitutes a "creature" in the 5e books. Jeremy Crawford has tweeted that a creature is a "being" of one of the types listed in the Monster Manual introduction.



But wait, does it lose its creaturehood if its dead?



No. Let's look at the Resurrection spell.




You touch a dead creature that has been dead for no more than a
century, that didn't die of old age, and that isn't undead.




Right. So being dead does not stop a creature from being a creature otherwise there would be no such thing as a "dead creature". But this is all a moot point anyway because the host is explicitly NOT dead. According to the Body Thief description, the host body is still alive until the intellect devourer leaves or is driven out of the brain cavity of the host body. There is no "effectively dead" or "dead for all intents and purposes" here. The body, the creature (I covered that) is not dead.



But wait! Is it still a humanoid?



This is getting a little circular, but Jeremy Crawford tweeted the humanoid is a creature type and a creature is a humanoid if they are of that type.



A creature type is a statistic found in a creature's stat block. If only we had a stat block for an intellect devourer in a host.



In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist (p. 210), we have a stat block for




Meloon Wardragon, an NPC possessed by an intellect devourer. It lists him as "Medium Humanoid (human), neutral evil" and we see that he knows Deep Speech and has telepathy 60 ft.




Based on the text that follows his stat block, under the heading "Adjusted Game Statistics", we see that is he is restored to his old self, his alignment changes, and he loses the Deep Speech and the telepathy. It does not say that his creature type changes to humanoid. And it would, since other game effects clearly call those types of changes out.



Looking at this stat block, we can conclude that this NPC is a valid target for a Ghost's Possession attack because he has the humanoid creature type.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    Jun 14 at 9:44















8












$begingroup$

Yes, the possession does override the intellect devourer and the intellect devourer would most likely want to abandon ship at that point, but could technically choose to stay along for the ride for a while to keep from being exposed. When the target dies, both the ghost and the intellect devourer would be forced out.



In light of another answer challenging some of the basic assumptions listed in the OP, here are the reasons why an intellect devourer's host is a valid target for a ghost's Possession.



Possession only requires it's target to be a humanoid. It says nothing about being conscious or "having awareness to begin with. The other answer has questioned whether an intellect devourer's host still counts a creature, and further questioned that if it was in fact a creature, was it still a humanoid.



Okay, so what's a creature?



There is no technical definition of what constitutes a "creature" in the 5e books. Jeremy Crawford has tweeted that a creature is a "being" of one of the types listed in the Monster Manual introduction.



But wait, does it lose its creaturehood if its dead?



No. Let's look at the Resurrection spell.




You touch a dead creature that has been dead for no more than a
century, that didn't die of old age, and that isn't undead.




Right. So being dead does not stop a creature from being a creature otherwise there would be no such thing as a "dead creature". But this is all a moot point anyway because the host is explicitly NOT dead. According to the Body Thief description, the host body is still alive until the intellect devourer leaves or is driven out of the brain cavity of the host body. There is no "effectively dead" or "dead for all intents and purposes" here. The body, the creature (I covered that) is not dead.



But wait! Is it still a humanoid?



This is getting a little circular, but Jeremy Crawford tweeted the humanoid is a creature type and a creature is a humanoid if they are of that type.



A creature type is a statistic found in a creature's stat block. If only we had a stat block for an intellect devourer in a host.



In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist (p. 210), we have a stat block for




Meloon Wardragon, an NPC possessed by an intellect devourer. It lists him as "Medium Humanoid (human), neutral evil" and we see that he knows Deep Speech and has telepathy 60 ft.




Based on the text that follows his stat block, under the heading "Adjusted Game Statistics", we see that is he is restored to his old self, his alignment changes, and he loses the Deep Speech and the telepathy. It does not say that his creature type changes to humanoid. And it would, since other game effects clearly call those types of changes out.



Looking at this stat block, we can conclude that this NPC is a valid target for a Ghost's Possession attack because he has the humanoid creature type.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    Jun 14 at 9:44













8












8








8





$begingroup$

Yes, the possession does override the intellect devourer and the intellect devourer would most likely want to abandon ship at that point, but could technically choose to stay along for the ride for a while to keep from being exposed. When the target dies, both the ghost and the intellect devourer would be forced out.



In light of another answer challenging some of the basic assumptions listed in the OP, here are the reasons why an intellect devourer's host is a valid target for a ghost's Possession.



Possession only requires it's target to be a humanoid. It says nothing about being conscious or "having awareness to begin with. The other answer has questioned whether an intellect devourer's host still counts a creature, and further questioned that if it was in fact a creature, was it still a humanoid.



Okay, so what's a creature?



There is no technical definition of what constitutes a "creature" in the 5e books. Jeremy Crawford has tweeted that a creature is a "being" of one of the types listed in the Monster Manual introduction.



But wait, does it lose its creaturehood if its dead?



No. Let's look at the Resurrection spell.




You touch a dead creature that has been dead for no more than a
century, that didn't die of old age, and that isn't undead.




Right. So being dead does not stop a creature from being a creature otherwise there would be no such thing as a "dead creature". But this is all a moot point anyway because the host is explicitly NOT dead. According to the Body Thief description, the host body is still alive until the intellect devourer leaves or is driven out of the brain cavity of the host body. There is no "effectively dead" or "dead for all intents and purposes" here. The body, the creature (I covered that) is not dead.



But wait! Is it still a humanoid?



This is getting a little circular, but Jeremy Crawford tweeted the humanoid is a creature type and a creature is a humanoid if they are of that type.



A creature type is a statistic found in a creature's stat block. If only we had a stat block for an intellect devourer in a host.



In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist (p. 210), we have a stat block for




Meloon Wardragon, an NPC possessed by an intellect devourer. It lists him as "Medium Humanoid (human), neutral evil" and we see that he knows Deep Speech and has telepathy 60 ft.




Based on the text that follows his stat block, under the heading "Adjusted Game Statistics", we see that is he is restored to his old self, his alignment changes, and he loses the Deep Speech and the telepathy. It does not say that his creature type changes to humanoid. And it would, since other game effects clearly call those types of changes out.



Looking at this stat block, we can conclude that this NPC is a valid target for a Ghost's Possession attack because he has the humanoid creature type.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Yes, the possession does override the intellect devourer and the intellect devourer would most likely want to abandon ship at that point, but could technically choose to stay along for the ride for a while to keep from being exposed. When the target dies, both the ghost and the intellect devourer would be forced out.



In light of another answer challenging some of the basic assumptions listed in the OP, here are the reasons why an intellect devourer's host is a valid target for a ghost's Possession.



Possession only requires it's target to be a humanoid. It says nothing about being conscious or "having awareness to begin with. The other answer has questioned whether an intellect devourer's host still counts a creature, and further questioned that if it was in fact a creature, was it still a humanoid.



Okay, so what's a creature?



There is no technical definition of what constitutes a "creature" in the 5e books. Jeremy Crawford has tweeted that a creature is a "being" of one of the types listed in the Monster Manual introduction.



But wait, does it lose its creaturehood if its dead?



No. Let's look at the Resurrection spell.




You touch a dead creature that has been dead for no more than a
century, that didn't die of old age, and that isn't undead.




Right. So being dead does not stop a creature from being a creature otherwise there would be no such thing as a "dead creature". But this is all a moot point anyway because the host is explicitly NOT dead. According to the Body Thief description, the host body is still alive until the intellect devourer leaves or is driven out of the brain cavity of the host body. There is no "effectively dead" or "dead for all intents and purposes" here. The body, the creature (I covered that) is not dead.



But wait! Is it still a humanoid?



This is getting a little circular, but Jeremy Crawford tweeted the humanoid is a creature type and a creature is a humanoid if they are of that type.



A creature type is a statistic found in a creature's stat block. If only we had a stat block for an intellect devourer in a host.



In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist (p. 210), we have a stat block for




Meloon Wardragon, an NPC possessed by an intellect devourer. It lists him as "Medium Humanoid (human), neutral evil" and we see that he knows Deep Speech and has telepathy 60 ft.




Based on the text that follows his stat block, under the heading "Adjusted Game Statistics", we see that is he is restored to his old self, his alignment changes, and he loses the Deep Speech and the telepathy. It does not say that his creature type changes to humanoid. And it would, since other game effects clearly call those types of changes out.



Looking at this stat block, we can conclude that this NPC is a valid target for a Ghost's Possession attack because he has the humanoid creature type.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 14 at 9:47









V2Blast

30.8k5 gold badges115 silver badges188 bronze badges




30.8k5 gold badges115 silver badges188 bronze badges










answered Jun 14 at 1:21









LumenbeingLumenbeing

8685 silver badges12 bronze badges




8685 silver badges12 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    Jun 14 at 9:44
















  • $begingroup$
    Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    Jun 14 at 9:44















$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
Jun 14 at 9:44




$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/135876/44723
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
Jun 14 at 9:44













4












$begingroup$

There is effectively no humanoid the Ghost can target



The way that I am reading the Body Thief ability of the Intellect Devourer is that the brain is destroyed.



(Emphasis mine)




Body Thief. The intellect devourer initiates an Intelligence
contest with an incapacitated humanoid within 5 feet of it. If
it wins the contest, the intellect devourer magically consumes
the target's brain
, teleports into the target's skull, and takes
control of the target's body. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The brain is consumed by the Devourer, essentially leaving the body just a shell or a husk with a cavity left in the skull that the Devourer then resides in to control the husk of the former creature. This is further supported further down the description of the ability:




The intellect devourer is also forced out if the target regains its devoured brain by
means of a wish. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The Ghost's Possession ability reads as (emphasis mine):




One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. -Monster Manual pg. 147




The original creature no longer has control of it's body as it is, and is for all intents and purposes dead once the Devourer actually consumes the brain and assumes control of the body, so it could be reasoned that the Ghost wouldn't even be able to target it since it would no longer technically be a humanoid, just a human body being piloted by an Intellect Devourer which cannot be possessed by a ghost.



While the Ghost would not "deprive the target of awareness", the target effectively no longer exists even if it could somehow possess the body and so has no awareness to be deprived.




"We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature."




While the body is still alive due it later saying the body dies if the Devourer leaves, it doesn't say that the body itself still counts as a creature even though you could infer that. And even if it were a creature, it wouldn't necessarily count as a humanoid since it is basically a mech suit made of meat that contains the Devourer.



The last sentence of Body Thief reads:




The body then dies, unless its brain is restored within 1 round. -Monster Manual pg. 191




It doesn't actually state that the "creature" the Devourer targeted dies, just the body dies. This would imply that the creature is effectively dead the moment the brain is consumed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:30






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
    $endgroup$
    – hajef
    Jun 14 at 10:30















4












$begingroup$

There is effectively no humanoid the Ghost can target



The way that I am reading the Body Thief ability of the Intellect Devourer is that the brain is destroyed.



(Emphasis mine)




Body Thief. The intellect devourer initiates an Intelligence
contest with an incapacitated humanoid within 5 feet of it. If
it wins the contest, the intellect devourer magically consumes
the target's brain
, teleports into the target's skull, and takes
control of the target's body. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The brain is consumed by the Devourer, essentially leaving the body just a shell or a husk with a cavity left in the skull that the Devourer then resides in to control the husk of the former creature. This is further supported further down the description of the ability:




The intellect devourer is also forced out if the target regains its devoured brain by
means of a wish. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The Ghost's Possession ability reads as (emphasis mine):




One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. -Monster Manual pg. 147




The original creature no longer has control of it's body as it is, and is for all intents and purposes dead once the Devourer actually consumes the brain and assumes control of the body, so it could be reasoned that the Ghost wouldn't even be able to target it since it would no longer technically be a humanoid, just a human body being piloted by an Intellect Devourer which cannot be possessed by a ghost.



While the Ghost would not "deprive the target of awareness", the target effectively no longer exists even if it could somehow possess the body and so has no awareness to be deprived.




"We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature."




While the body is still alive due it later saying the body dies if the Devourer leaves, it doesn't say that the body itself still counts as a creature even though you could infer that. And even if it were a creature, it wouldn't necessarily count as a humanoid since it is basically a mech suit made of meat that contains the Devourer.



The last sentence of Body Thief reads:




The body then dies, unless its brain is restored within 1 round. -Monster Manual pg. 191




It doesn't actually state that the "creature" the Devourer targeted dies, just the body dies. This would imply that the creature is effectively dead the moment the brain is consumed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:30






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
    $endgroup$
    – hajef
    Jun 14 at 10:30













4












4








4





$begingroup$

There is effectively no humanoid the Ghost can target



The way that I am reading the Body Thief ability of the Intellect Devourer is that the brain is destroyed.



(Emphasis mine)




Body Thief. The intellect devourer initiates an Intelligence
contest with an incapacitated humanoid within 5 feet of it. If
it wins the contest, the intellect devourer magically consumes
the target's brain
, teleports into the target's skull, and takes
control of the target's body. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The brain is consumed by the Devourer, essentially leaving the body just a shell or a husk with a cavity left in the skull that the Devourer then resides in to control the husk of the former creature. This is further supported further down the description of the ability:




The intellect devourer is also forced out if the target regains its devoured brain by
means of a wish. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The Ghost's Possession ability reads as (emphasis mine):




One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. -Monster Manual pg. 147




The original creature no longer has control of it's body as it is, and is for all intents and purposes dead once the Devourer actually consumes the brain and assumes control of the body, so it could be reasoned that the Ghost wouldn't even be able to target it since it would no longer technically be a humanoid, just a human body being piloted by an Intellect Devourer which cannot be possessed by a ghost.



While the Ghost would not "deprive the target of awareness", the target effectively no longer exists even if it could somehow possess the body and so has no awareness to be deprived.




"We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature."




While the body is still alive due it later saying the body dies if the Devourer leaves, it doesn't say that the body itself still counts as a creature even though you could infer that. And even if it were a creature, it wouldn't necessarily count as a humanoid since it is basically a mech suit made of meat that contains the Devourer.



The last sentence of Body Thief reads:




The body then dies, unless its brain is restored within 1 round. -Monster Manual pg. 191




It doesn't actually state that the "creature" the Devourer targeted dies, just the body dies. This would imply that the creature is effectively dead the moment the brain is consumed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



There is effectively no humanoid the Ghost can target



The way that I am reading the Body Thief ability of the Intellect Devourer is that the brain is destroyed.



(Emphasis mine)




Body Thief. The intellect devourer initiates an Intelligence
contest with an incapacitated humanoid within 5 feet of it. If
it wins the contest, the intellect devourer magically consumes
the target's brain
, teleports into the target's skull, and takes
control of the target's body. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The brain is consumed by the Devourer, essentially leaving the body just a shell or a husk with a cavity left in the skull that the Devourer then resides in to control the husk of the former creature. This is further supported further down the description of the ability:




The intellect devourer is also forced out if the target regains its devoured brain by
means of a wish. -Monster Manual pg. 191




The Ghost's Possession ability reads as (emphasis mine):




One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. -Monster Manual pg. 147




The original creature no longer has control of it's body as it is, and is for all intents and purposes dead once the Devourer actually consumes the brain and assumes control of the body, so it could be reasoned that the Ghost wouldn't even be able to target it since it would no longer technically be a humanoid, just a human body being piloted by an Intellect Devourer which cannot be possessed by a ghost.



While the Ghost would not "deprive the target of awareness", the target effectively no longer exists even if it could somehow possess the body and so has no awareness to be deprived.




"We know that the victim's body is still alive and counts as a creature."




While the body is still alive due it later saying the body dies if the Devourer leaves, it doesn't say that the body itself still counts as a creature even though you could infer that. And even if it were a creature, it wouldn't necessarily count as a humanoid since it is basically a mech suit made of meat that contains the Devourer.



The last sentence of Body Thief reads:




The body then dies, unless its brain is restored within 1 round. -Monster Manual pg. 191




It doesn't actually state that the "creature" the Devourer targeted dies, just the body dies. This would imply that the creature is effectively dead the moment the brain is consumed.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 14 at 3:39

























answered Jun 14 at 3:28









SeidrSeidr

8676 silver badges16 bronze badges




8676 silver badges16 bronze badges







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:30






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
    $endgroup$
    – hajef
    Jun 14 at 10:30












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:30






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
    $endgroup$
    – Lumenbeing
    Jun 14 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
    $endgroup$
    – hajef
    Jun 14 at 10:30







4




4




$begingroup$
It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 7:30




$begingroup$
It does say that the body is still a creature, though. It says "while inside a creature..."
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 7:30




2




2




$begingroup$
If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 7:52




$begingroup$
If that were not the case, it would be impossible to target an intellect devourer with almost any spell that requires a "creature" as a target, including Protection from Evil and Good. And we know that that spell CAN target the host body because its listed as a way to end Body Thief. And since the intellect devourer "otherwise adopts the target's statistics" it adopts its creature type, which is "humanoid."
$endgroup$
– Lumenbeing
Jun 14 at 7:52












$begingroup$
I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
$endgroup$
– hajef
Jun 14 at 10:30




$begingroup$
I think it's safe to say, that the original creature is "brain dead", but even more: taking @Lumenbeing 's comment into account, if the intellect devourer adopts the target's type, doesn't that imply that the target is basically discarded (devouring a humanoid does not result in the existence of two humanoids)? On the other hand, if the ghost can't possess an intellect devourer but the type is now humanoid, one could even argue that the ghost can possess the intellect devourer under these circumstances.
$endgroup$
– hajef
Jun 14 at 10:30

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149908%2fwhat-happens-when-a-ghost-uses-the-possess-action-on-a-victim-of-an-intellect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?