How do CMB photons 'gain energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter' and 'lose energy when they pass through voids'?Why is the CMB not simply travelling parallel to us?
How dangerous are set-size assumptions?
Links to webpages in books
How was Hillel permitted to go to the skylight to hear the shiur
Employer wants to use my work email account after I quit
Why did pressing the joystick button spit out keypresses?
If the world have massive single giant world tree can it stop earthquake?
How do I turn off a repeating trade?
STM Microcontroller burns every time
Fedora boot screen shows both Fedora logo and Lenovo logo. Why and How?
Proving a certain type of topology is discrete without the axiom of choice
Is there a way to split the metadata to custom folders?
What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?
Is it damaging to turn off a small fridge for two days every week?
Where do I get advice and guidance from in my PhD if my supervisor is not an expert in the field I am working on?
Why do textbooks often include the solutions to odd or even numbered problems but not both?
Should my manager be aware of private LinkedIn approaches I receive? How to politely have this happen?
Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board
What is the mechanical difference between the Spectator's Create Food and Water action and the Banshee's Undead Nature Trait?
Why cruise at 7000' in an A319?
The Target Principal Name Is Incorrect. Cannot Generate SSPI Context (SQL or AD Issue)?
Should developer taking test phones home or put in office?
How would modern naval warfare have to have developed differently for battleships to still be relevant in the 21st century?
How risky is real estate?
Has there been any indication at all that further negotiation between the UK and EU is possible?
How do CMB photons 'gain energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter' and 'lose energy when they pass through voids'?
Why is the CMB not simply travelling parallel to us?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The Space.com article Huge Hole Found in the Universe says:
The gargantuan hole was found by examining observations made using the Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope, funded by the National Science Foundation.
There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
The region had been previously been dubbed the "WMAP Cold Spot," because it stood out in a map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation made by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotopy Probe (WMAP) satellite. The CMB is an imprint of radiation left from the Big Bang, the theoretical beginning of the universe.
"Although our surprising results need independent confirmation, the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said.
Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler. (emphasis added)
Question: How do CMB photons gain energy when they pass through "normal regions of space with matter" and lose energy when they pass through voids?
cmb
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Space.com article Huge Hole Found in the Universe says:
The gargantuan hole was found by examining observations made using the Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope, funded by the National Science Foundation.
There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
The region had been previously been dubbed the "WMAP Cold Spot," because it stood out in a map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation made by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotopy Probe (WMAP) satellite. The CMB is an imprint of radiation left from the Big Bang, the theoretical beginning of the universe.
"Although our surprising results need independent confirmation, the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said.
Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler. (emphasis added)
Question: How do CMB photons gain energy when they pass through "normal regions of space with matter" and lose energy when they pass through voids?
cmb
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
1
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Space.com article Huge Hole Found in the Universe says:
The gargantuan hole was found by examining observations made using the Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope, funded by the National Science Foundation.
There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
The region had been previously been dubbed the "WMAP Cold Spot," because it stood out in a map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation made by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotopy Probe (WMAP) satellite. The CMB is an imprint of radiation left from the Big Bang, the theoretical beginning of the universe.
"Although our surprising results need independent confirmation, the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said.
Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler. (emphasis added)
Question: How do CMB photons gain energy when they pass through "normal regions of space with matter" and lose energy when they pass through voids?
cmb
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The Space.com article Huge Hole Found in the Universe says:
The gargantuan hole was found by examining observations made using the Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope, funded by the National Science Foundation.
There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
The region had been previously been dubbed the "WMAP Cold Spot," because it stood out in a map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation made by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotopy Probe (WMAP) satellite. The CMB is an imprint of radiation left from the Big Bang, the theoretical beginning of the universe.
"Although our surprising results need independent confirmation, the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said.
Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler. (emphasis added)
Question: How do CMB photons gain energy when they pass through "normal regions of space with matter" and lose energy when they pass through voids?
cmb
cmb
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
asked Jun 14 at 1:14
uhohuhoh
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
8,9632 gold badges25 silver badges81 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
1
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
1
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
1
1
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is the late time integrated Sachs Wolfe effect.
As they travel towards us, apart from the general expansion, photons from the CMB gain energy when they fall into potential wells (where matter is). Of course, they lose it again as they emerge on the other side of the well, but the cosmic expansion means that the well isn't quite as deep by the time that happens. As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline.
The opposite happens for voids. Energy is required to enter a void (the potential is higher than average), but all this energy is not retrieved because the potential flattens due to expansion as the photon traverses it. Hence the directions of voids would be a bit cooler.
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "514"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32284%2fhow-do-cmb-photons-gain-energy-when-they-pass-through-normal-regions-of-space-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is the late time integrated Sachs Wolfe effect.
As they travel towards us, apart from the general expansion, photons from the CMB gain energy when they fall into potential wells (where matter is). Of course, they lose it again as they emerge on the other side of the well, but the cosmic expansion means that the well isn't quite as deep by the time that happens. As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline.
The opposite happens for voids. Energy is required to enter a void (the potential is higher than average), but all this energy is not retrieved because the potential flattens due to expansion as the photon traverses it. Hence the directions of voids would be a bit cooler.
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is the late time integrated Sachs Wolfe effect.
As they travel towards us, apart from the general expansion, photons from the CMB gain energy when they fall into potential wells (where matter is). Of course, they lose it again as they emerge on the other side of the well, but the cosmic expansion means that the well isn't quite as deep by the time that happens. As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline.
The opposite happens for voids. Energy is required to enter a void (the potential is higher than average), but all this energy is not retrieved because the potential flattens due to expansion as the photon traverses it. Hence the directions of voids would be a bit cooler.
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is the late time integrated Sachs Wolfe effect.
As they travel towards us, apart from the general expansion, photons from the CMB gain energy when they fall into potential wells (where matter is). Of course, they lose it again as they emerge on the other side of the well, but the cosmic expansion means that the well isn't quite as deep by the time that happens. As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline.
The opposite happens for voids. Energy is required to enter a void (the potential is higher than average), but all this energy is not retrieved because the potential flattens due to expansion as the photon traverses it. Hence the directions of voids would be a bit cooler.
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
$endgroup$
It is the late time integrated Sachs Wolfe effect.
As they travel towards us, apart from the general expansion, photons from the CMB gain energy when they fall into potential wells (where matter is). Of course, they lose it again as they emerge on the other side of the well, but the cosmic expansion means that the well isn't quite as deep by the time that happens. As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline.
The opposite happens for voids. Energy is required to enter a void (the potential is higher than average), but all this energy is not retrieved because the potential flattens due to expansion as the photon traverses it. Hence the directions of voids would be a bit cooler.
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
answered Jun 14 at 6:57
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
56.5k4 gold badges117 silver badges186 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
Okay I have my homework for the weekend, thanks! No more cosmology questions for me until I catch up.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 12:19
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
$begingroup$
"As a result, photons gain a little energy compared to the average CMB sightline." CMB has less energy now then when it was released shortly after the big bang. So is the situation technically that CMB that traveled though areas with lots of matter lost less energy than CMB that didn't, rather than gained energy?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 14 at 16:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32284%2fhow-do-cmb-photons-gain-energy-when-they-pass-through-normal-regions-of-space-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure there's already an answer to this question, but maybe it's on Physics.SE. Basically, photons (like everything else) gain energy as they fall into gravity wells and lose energy as they climb out of gravity wells. And then you need to consider the expansion, which is greatest in voids & virtually non-existent inside galaxy clusters.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:57
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect? And despite several questions of my own (1, 2, 3) and reading others, I am still confused by the idea that metric expansion only happens in "empty" space (e.g. voids, etc.) If that's what's happening in this case, then I'm a goner and I'll never understand this.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 14 at 4:37
1
$begingroup$
would passing from "normal" through a void and back to "normal" again have no net gravitational effect It would, if there were no metric expansion. But since there is expansion, the net effect is to increase the redshift.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 4:45
$begingroup$
Wouldn't photons falling into a gravity well and then climbing out again have a greater distance to travel and therefore be slowed down?. After all,the speed of c is constant,so greater distance = greater time. Would this result in 'tired light' if the photons came from distant quasars? They may have had to negotiate numerous gravitational wells on their journey.
$endgroup$
– Michael Walsby
Jun 14 at 10:43
$begingroup$
@MichaelWalsby see the answer from Rob Jeffries. You have the right two things interacting -- expansion of the universe and gravitational potential wells, but it turns out when you do the numbers that the effect is the opposite of what you suggest. The expansion "smooths out" these very large shallow potential wells (and hills) so that coming out of them has less total effect than going in did.
$endgroup$
– Steve Linton
Jun 14 at 12:54