Can you cover a cube with copies of this shape?Hidden planet areaPolyominoes on a checkerboardPoints on a cubeWhich 3D shape can you make out of this?Cutting from a cube (visualization test)Reassembling the Marquetry II: The Coffee Table Strikes BackSimple geometry. Or is it?Unlimited paper foldingHow many $2 times 2 times 1$ blocks can you put in a $3 times 3 times 3$ cube?How can this shape perfectly cover a cube?

Has there been any indication at all that further negotiation between the UK and EU is possible?

Why is the voltage measurement of this circuit different when the switch is on?

Can any NP-Complete Problem be solved using at most polynomial space (but while using exponential time?)

Folding basket - is there such a thing?

Can the negators "jamais, rien, personne, plus, ni, aucun" be used in a single sentence?

Links to webpages in books

Suggested order for Amazon Prime Doctor Who series

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

Why do textbooks often include the solutions to odd or even numbered problems but not both?

Unusual mail headers, evidence of an attempted attack. Have I been pwned?

Does Marvel have an equivalent of the Green Lantern?

Why did pressing the joystick button spit out keypresses?

If the world have massive single giant world tree can it stop earthquake?

What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?

Can humans ever directly see a few photons at a time? Can a human see a single photon?

Iterate over colors on next pie chart with pgf-pie

3D Crossword, Cryptic, Statue View & Maze

Archery in modern conflicts

First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field

Intuition for capacitors in series

Do I have any obligations to my PhD supervisor's requests after I have graduated?

How was Hillel permitted to go to the skylight to hear the shiur

C-152 carb heat on before landing in hot weather?

Is this one of the engines from the 9/11 aircraft?



Can you cover a cube with copies of this shape?


Hidden planet areaPolyominoes on a checkerboardPoints on a cubeWhich 3D shape can you make out of this?Cutting from a cube (visualization test)Reassembling the Marquetry II: The Coffee Table Strikes BackSimple geometry. Or is it?Unlimited paper foldingHow many $2 times 2 times 1$ blocks can you put in a $3 times 3 times 3$ cube?How can this shape perfectly cover a cube?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








14












$begingroup$


The following shape has an interesting property:



Cube-covering shape



It is possible to map multiple copies of
this shape onto the surface of a cube in a way that perfectly covers the entire cube with no gaps and no overlaps.



How can this be done, and how many copies of the shape are needed?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    14












    $begingroup$


    The following shape has an interesting property:



    Cube-covering shape



    It is possible to map multiple copies of
    this shape onto the surface of a cube in a way that perfectly covers the entire cube with no gaps and no overlaps.



    How can this be done, and how many copies of the shape are needed?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      14












      14








      14


      2



      $begingroup$


      The following shape has an interesting property:



      Cube-covering shape



      It is possible to map multiple copies of
      this shape onto the surface of a cube in a way that perfectly covers the entire cube with no gaps and no overlaps.



      How can this be done, and how many copies of the shape are needed?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The following shape has an interesting property:



      Cube-covering shape



      It is possible to map multiple copies of
      this shape onto the surface of a cube in a way that perfectly covers the entire cube with no gaps and no overlaps.



      How can this be done, and how many copies of the shape are needed?







      geometry three-dimensional paper-folding






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jun 14 at 4:38









      plasticinsectplasticinsect

      9192 silver badges15 bronze badges




      9192 silver badges15 bronze badges




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          21












          $begingroup$

          This can be done




          with three copies. (There are 20 squares, and we need the total area to be divisible by 6 if we want a whole number of squares to fit on each face, so 3 is the minimum. If we don't have a whole number of squares on each face, there will be partial squares on faces, and the pieces won't fit together perfectly.)




          To figure out how to do it,




          the natural place to look is at the orange circle in this drawing:
          annotated shape
          That lower-right hole looks like it'll be hard to fill. But if we can put a vertex of the cube at the orange circle, that means we can bend the shape along the orange arrow, so it occupies the dark gray line. Once that's in place, a similar maneuver can be done at the pink circle to bend the upper right side down, compacting the entire shape into a single blob. And now, this can be done with three copies of the shape, making the yellow circled points of each shape touch at a vertex.




          Here are some images of the covering:




          Front view (focused on the "orange circle" fold):
          image centered on front vertex

          Top and bottom view (focused on the "yellow circle" vertex, and the point directly opposite that)
          image centered on top verteximage centered on bottom vertex







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
            $endgroup$
            – greenturtle3141
            Jun 14 at 14:43






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 17:06






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
            $endgroup$
            – BruceWayne
            Jun 14 at 18:44






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            Jun 14 at 19:21






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 19:35













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85058%2fcan-you-cover-a-cube-with-copies-of-this-shape%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          21












          $begingroup$

          This can be done




          with three copies. (There are 20 squares, and we need the total area to be divisible by 6 if we want a whole number of squares to fit on each face, so 3 is the minimum. If we don't have a whole number of squares on each face, there will be partial squares on faces, and the pieces won't fit together perfectly.)




          To figure out how to do it,




          the natural place to look is at the orange circle in this drawing:
          annotated shape
          That lower-right hole looks like it'll be hard to fill. But if we can put a vertex of the cube at the orange circle, that means we can bend the shape along the orange arrow, so it occupies the dark gray line. Once that's in place, a similar maneuver can be done at the pink circle to bend the upper right side down, compacting the entire shape into a single blob. And now, this can be done with three copies of the shape, making the yellow circled points of each shape touch at a vertex.




          Here are some images of the covering:




          Front view (focused on the "orange circle" fold):
          image centered on front vertex

          Top and bottom view (focused on the "yellow circle" vertex, and the point directly opposite that)
          image centered on top verteximage centered on bottom vertex







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
            $endgroup$
            – greenturtle3141
            Jun 14 at 14:43






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 17:06






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
            $endgroup$
            – BruceWayne
            Jun 14 at 18:44






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            Jun 14 at 19:21






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 19:35















          21












          $begingroup$

          This can be done




          with three copies. (There are 20 squares, and we need the total area to be divisible by 6 if we want a whole number of squares to fit on each face, so 3 is the minimum. If we don't have a whole number of squares on each face, there will be partial squares on faces, and the pieces won't fit together perfectly.)




          To figure out how to do it,




          the natural place to look is at the orange circle in this drawing:
          annotated shape
          That lower-right hole looks like it'll be hard to fill. But if we can put a vertex of the cube at the orange circle, that means we can bend the shape along the orange arrow, so it occupies the dark gray line. Once that's in place, a similar maneuver can be done at the pink circle to bend the upper right side down, compacting the entire shape into a single blob. And now, this can be done with three copies of the shape, making the yellow circled points of each shape touch at a vertex.




          Here are some images of the covering:




          Front view (focused on the "orange circle" fold):
          image centered on front vertex

          Top and bottom view (focused on the "yellow circle" vertex, and the point directly opposite that)
          image centered on top verteximage centered on bottom vertex







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
            $endgroup$
            – greenturtle3141
            Jun 14 at 14:43






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 17:06






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
            $endgroup$
            – BruceWayne
            Jun 14 at 18:44






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            Jun 14 at 19:21






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 19:35













          21












          21








          21





          $begingroup$

          This can be done




          with three copies. (There are 20 squares, and we need the total area to be divisible by 6 if we want a whole number of squares to fit on each face, so 3 is the minimum. If we don't have a whole number of squares on each face, there will be partial squares on faces, and the pieces won't fit together perfectly.)




          To figure out how to do it,




          the natural place to look is at the orange circle in this drawing:
          annotated shape
          That lower-right hole looks like it'll be hard to fill. But if we can put a vertex of the cube at the orange circle, that means we can bend the shape along the orange arrow, so it occupies the dark gray line. Once that's in place, a similar maneuver can be done at the pink circle to bend the upper right side down, compacting the entire shape into a single blob. And now, this can be done with three copies of the shape, making the yellow circled points of each shape touch at a vertex.




          Here are some images of the covering:




          Front view (focused on the "orange circle" fold):
          image centered on front vertex

          Top and bottom view (focused on the "yellow circle" vertex, and the point directly opposite that)
          image centered on top verteximage centered on bottom vertex







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This can be done




          with three copies. (There are 20 squares, and we need the total area to be divisible by 6 if we want a whole number of squares to fit on each face, so 3 is the minimum. If we don't have a whole number of squares on each face, there will be partial squares on faces, and the pieces won't fit together perfectly.)




          To figure out how to do it,




          the natural place to look is at the orange circle in this drawing:
          annotated shape
          That lower-right hole looks like it'll be hard to fill. But if we can put a vertex of the cube at the orange circle, that means we can bend the shape along the orange arrow, so it occupies the dark gray line. Once that's in place, a similar maneuver can be done at the pink circle to bend the upper right side down, compacting the entire shape into a single blob. And now, this can be done with three copies of the shape, making the yellow circled points of each shape touch at a vertex.




          Here are some images of the covering:




          Front view (focused on the "orange circle" fold):
          image centered on front vertex

          Top and bottom view (focused on the "yellow circle" vertex, and the point directly opposite that)
          image centered on top verteximage centered on bottom vertex








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jun 14 at 7:24









          DeusoviDeusovi

          67.4k7 gold badges232 silver badges295 bronze badges




          67.4k7 gold badges232 silver badges295 bronze badges







          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
            $endgroup$
            – greenturtle3141
            Jun 14 at 14:43






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 17:06






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
            $endgroup$
            – BruceWayne
            Jun 14 at 18:44






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            Jun 14 at 19:21






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 19:35












          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
            $endgroup$
            – greenturtle3141
            Jun 14 at 14:43






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 17:06






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
            $endgroup$
            – BruceWayne
            Jun 14 at 18:44






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            Jun 14 at 19:21






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
            $endgroup$
            – plasticinsect
            Jun 14 at 19:35







          6




          6




          $begingroup$
          Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
          $endgroup$
          – greenturtle3141
          Jun 14 at 14:43




          $begingroup$
          Jesus Christ, how did you see this?!
          $endgroup$
          – greenturtle3141
          Jun 14 at 14:43




          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
          $endgroup$
          – plasticinsect
          Jun 14 at 17:06




          $begingroup$
          I am stunned by your near-superhuman puzzle solving ability.
          $endgroup$
          – plasticinsect
          Jun 14 at 17:06




          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
          $endgroup$
          – BruceWayne
          Jun 14 at 18:44




          $begingroup$
          @greenturtle3141 - it's easy. ...when you live and see in another dimension and merely visit ours briefly to solve our puzzles.
          $endgroup$
          – BruceWayne
          Jun 14 at 18:44




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          Jun 14 at 19:21




          $begingroup$
          @greenturtle3141 My answer basically shows my thought process -- first I realized that I'd have to use a 3-forward-1-sideways line as the cube edge (based on counting squares, I needed a side length of √10). The orange spot came next, because it seemed like the only real way to fill the gap there, and then the pink spot came immediately after -- after that, all that was left was drawing it out to make sure that it would cover the cube as it seemed.
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          Jun 14 at 19:21




          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
          $endgroup$
          – plasticinsect
          Jun 14 at 19:35




          $begingroup$
          @Deusovi - Your comment is not inconsistent with BruceWayne's hypothesis. :)
          $endgroup$
          – plasticinsect
          Jun 14 at 19:35

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85058%2fcan-you-cover-a-cube-with-copies-of-this-shape%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?