How to factor a fourth degree polynomialRoots of $z^4 + 2z^3 + 20z + 12 = 0$How can I factor in an extra player on a percentage split?How can I re-arrange this equation?Factoring a couple $5$th degree polynomialsShow that $(n - 1)2^n+1 + 2 + (n+1)2^n+1 = n(2^n+2)+2$Rewriting solution in terms of hyperbolic trigsFactoring the quartic polynomial $x^4-2x^2+1$Finding an nth degree polynomial.How to show algebraically that $x^3 +3x +1$ is injective?Finding the value of k in a matrixHow to divide a polynomial by a binomial using factoring when there could be a “remainder”

Replacements for swear words

Crowbar circuit causes unexpected behavior for op amp circuit

What is temperature on a quantum level

Machine learning and operations research projects

What's the fastest way to get Hard To Borrow (HTB) stocks?

Supporting developers who insist on using their pet language

Was the Ford Model T black because of the speed black paint dries?

What would be the ideal melee weapon made of "Phase Metal"?

Shortest distance around a pyramid

How do I take a fraction to a negative power?

Why is dry soil hydrophobic? Bad gardener paradox

Optimising Table wrapping over a Select

Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?

How might the United Kingdom become a republic?

Would letting a multiclass character rebuild their character to be single-classed be game-breaking?

What's a moment that's more impactful on a reread called?

How do I determine whether a permit is required for a new gas line?

Why can't supermassive black holes merge? (or can they?)

Cubic programming and beyond?

If a specific mass of air is polluted, will the pollution stick with it?

Can I call 112 to check a police officer's identity in the Czech Republic?

Filtering fine silt/mud from water (not necessarily bacteria etc.)

Reverse the word order in string, without reversing the words

Is purchasing foreign currency before going abroad a losing proposition?



How to factor a fourth degree polynomial


Roots of $z^4 + 2z^3 + 20z + 12 = 0$How can I factor in an extra player on a percentage split?How can I re-arrange this equation?Factoring a couple $5$th degree polynomialsShow that $(n - 1)2^n+1 + 2 + (n+1)2^n+1 = n(2^n+2)+2$Rewriting solution in terms of hyperbolic trigsFactoring the quartic polynomial $x^4-2x^2+1$Finding an nth degree polynomial.How to show algebraically that $x^3 +3x +1$ is injective?Finding the value of k in a matrixHow to divide a polynomial by a binomial using factoring when there could be a “remainder”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








24












$begingroup$


I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:



$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$



I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 7:38










  • $begingroup$
    A related question.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jul 7 at 16:22

















24












$begingroup$


I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:



$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$



I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 7:38










  • $begingroup$
    A related question.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jul 7 at 16:22













24












24








24


3



$begingroup$


I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:



$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$



I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:



$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$



I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.







algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 4 at 9:48









Michael Rozenberg

119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges




119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges










asked Jul 4 at 7:30









LoopLoop

1235 bronze badges




1235 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    @EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 7:38










  • $begingroup$
    A related question.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jul 7 at 16:22
















  • $begingroup$
    @EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 7:38










  • $begingroup$
    A related question.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucian
    Jul 7 at 16:22















$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38




$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38












$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22




$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















33












$begingroup$

The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:



  1. one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.

$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



  1. the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.

$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.



For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:



$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$



where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)



$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$



Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    A really good explaination!
    $endgroup$
    – Emilia314
    Jul 4 at 7:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    Jul 4 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 20:07










  • $begingroup$
    @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    Jul 5 at 1:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
    $endgroup$
    – richard1941
    Jul 9 at 19:36


















22












$begingroup$

Let



$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$



Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well



$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$



The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
    $endgroup$
    – Bladewood
    Jul 4 at 17:53










  • $begingroup$
    @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
    $endgroup$
    – Lozenges
    Jul 4 at 19:07


















12












$begingroup$

Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Definitely the way to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – EpsilonDelta
    Jul 4 at 7:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
    $endgroup$
    – Loop
    Jul 4 at 7:42










  • $begingroup$
    Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jul 4 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
    $endgroup$
    – Bladewood
    Jul 4 at 17:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
    $endgroup$
    – Kitegi
    Jul 5 at 8:34


















4












$begingroup$

Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.




Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin R
      Jul 4 at 7:48







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
      $endgroup$
      – mathreadler
      Jul 4 at 7:50


















    1












    $begingroup$

    For all real $k$ we obtain:
    $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
    Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.



    For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
    $$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
    $$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
    We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
    $$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
    $$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      For an investigative approach:



      Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.



      Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.



      Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.



      Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3282632%2fhow-to-factor-a-fourth-degree-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        33












        $begingroup$

        The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:



        1. one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        1. the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.



        For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:



        $$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$



        where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)



        $$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
        $$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
        $$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
        $$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$



        Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 7




          $begingroup$
          A really good explaination!
          $endgroup$
          – Emilia314
          Jul 4 at 7:47






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 4 at 7:47










        • $begingroup$
          Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 20:07










        • $begingroup$
          @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 5 at 1:49






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
          $endgroup$
          – richard1941
          Jul 9 at 19:36















        33












        $begingroup$

        The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:



        1. one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        1. the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.



        For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:



        $$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$



        where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)



        $$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
        $$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
        $$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
        $$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$



        Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 7




          $begingroup$
          A really good explaination!
          $endgroup$
          – Emilia314
          Jul 4 at 7:47






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 4 at 7:47










        • $begingroup$
          Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 20:07










        • $begingroup$
          @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 5 at 1:49






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
          $endgroup$
          – richard1941
          Jul 9 at 19:36













        33












        33








        33





        $begingroup$

        The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:



        1. one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        1. the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.



        For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:



        $$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$



        where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)



        $$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
        $$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
        $$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
        $$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$



        Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:



        1. one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        1. the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.

        $$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$



        The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.



        For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:



        $$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$



        where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)



        $$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
        $$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
        $$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
        $$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$



        Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 4 at 7:48

























        answered Jul 4 at 7:42









        The_SympathizerThe_Sympathizer

        10.2k3 gold badges29 silver badges51 bronze badges




        10.2k3 gold badges29 silver badges51 bronze badges







        • 7




          $begingroup$
          A really good explaination!
          $endgroup$
          – Emilia314
          Jul 4 at 7:47






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 4 at 7:47










        • $begingroup$
          Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 20:07










        • $begingroup$
          @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 5 at 1:49






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
          $endgroup$
          – richard1941
          Jul 9 at 19:36












        • 7




          $begingroup$
          A really good explaination!
          $endgroup$
          – Emilia314
          Jul 4 at 7:47






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 4 at 7:47










        • $begingroup$
          Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 20:07










        • $begingroup$
          @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
          $endgroup$
          – The_Sympathizer
          Jul 5 at 1:49






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
          $endgroup$
          – richard1941
          Jul 9 at 19:36







        7




        7




        $begingroup$
        A really good explaination!
        $endgroup$
        – Emilia314
        Jul 4 at 7:47




        $begingroup$
        A really good explaination!
        $endgroup$
        – Emilia314
        Jul 4 at 7:47




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
        $endgroup$
        – The_Sympathizer
        Jul 4 at 7:47




        $begingroup$
        @Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
        $endgroup$
        – The_Sympathizer
        Jul 4 at 7:47












        $begingroup$
        Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
        $endgroup$
        – Loop
        Jul 4 at 20:07




        $begingroup$
        Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
        $endgroup$
        – Loop
        Jul 4 at 20:07












        $begingroup$
        @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
        $endgroup$
        – The_Sympathizer
        Jul 5 at 1:49




        $begingroup$
        @Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
        $endgroup$
        – The_Sympathizer
        Jul 5 at 1:49




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
        $endgroup$
        – richard1941
        Jul 9 at 19:36




        $begingroup$
        A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
        $endgroup$
        – richard1941
        Jul 9 at 19:36













        22












        $begingroup$

        Let



        $$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$



        Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well



        $$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$



        The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:53










        • $begingroup$
          @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
          $endgroup$
          – Lozenges
          Jul 4 at 19:07















        22












        $begingroup$

        Let



        $$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$



        Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well



        $$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$



        The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:53










        • $begingroup$
          @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
          $endgroup$
          – Lozenges
          Jul 4 at 19:07













        22












        22








        22





        $begingroup$

        Let



        $$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$



        Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well



        $$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$



        The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let



        $$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$



        Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well



        $$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$



        The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 4 at 19:06

























        answered Jul 4 at 11:41









        LozengesLozenges

        1,2895 silver badges8 bronze badges




        1,2895 silver badges8 bronze badges







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:53










        • $begingroup$
          @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
          $endgroup$
          – Lozenges
          Jul 4 at 19:07












        • 1




          $begingroup$
          (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:53










        • $begingroup$
          @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
          $endgroup$
          – Lozenges
          Jul 4 at 19:07







        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
        $endgroup$
        – Bladewood
        Jul 4 at 17:53




        $begingroup$
        (+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
        $endgroup$
        – Bladewood
        Jul 4 at 17:53












        $begingroup$
        @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
        $endgroup$
        – Lozenges
        Jul 4 at 19:07




        $begingroup$
        @Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
        $endgroup$
        – Lozenges
        Jul 4 at 19:07











        12












        $begingroup$

        Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
        Expanding the right-hand side
        $$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
        And you will get
        $$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Definitely the way to do this.
          $endgroup$
          – EpsilonDelta
          Jul 4 at 7:39






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 7:42










        • $begingroup$
          Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Towers
          Jul 4 at 16:37










        • $begingroup$
          I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:23






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
          $endgroup$
          – Kitegi
          Jul 5 at 8:34















        12












        $begingroup$

        Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
        Expanding the right-hand side
        $$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
        And you will get
        $$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Definitely the way to do this.
          $endgroup$
          – EpsilonDelta
          Jul 4 at 7:39






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 7:42










        • $begingroup$
          Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Towers
          Jul 4 at 16:37










        • $begingroup$
          I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:23






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
          $endgroup$
          – Kitegi
          Jul 5 at 8:34













        12












        12








        12





        $begingroup$

        Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
        Expanding the right-hand side
        $$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
        And you will get
        $$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
        Expanding the right-hand side
        $$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
        And you will get
        $$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 4 at 17:23

























        answered Jul 4 at 7:37









        Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner

        84.8k4 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges




        84.8k4 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges











        • $begingroup$
          Definitely the way to do this.
          $endgroup$
          – EpsilonDelta
          Jul 4 at 7:39






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 7:42










        • $begingroup$
          Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Towers
          Jul 4 at 16:37










        • $begingroup$
          I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:23






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
          $endgroup$
          – Kitegi
          Jul 5 at 8:34
















        • $begingroup$
          Definitely the way to do this.
          $endgroup$
          – EpsilonDelta
          Jul 4 at 7:39






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
          $endgroup$
          – Loop
          Jul 4 at 7:42










        • $begingroup$
          Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Towers
          Jul 4 at 16:37










        • $begingroup$
          I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Bladewood
          Jul 4 at 17:23






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
          $endgroup$
          – Kitegi
          Jul 5 at 8:34















        $begingroup$
        Definitely the way to do this.
        $endgroup$
        – EpsilonDelta
        Jul 4 at 7:39




        $begingroup$
        Definitely the way to do this.
        $endgroup$
        – EpsilonDelta
        Jul 4 at 7:39




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
        $endgroup$
        – Loop
        Jul 4 at 7:42




        $begingroup$
        Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
        $endgroup$
        – Loop
        Jul 4 at 7:42












        $begingroup$
        Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Jul 4 at 16:37




        $begingroup$
        Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Jul 4 at 16:37












        $begingroup$
        I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
        $endgroup$
        – Bladewood
        Jul 4 at 17:23




        $begingroup$
        I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
        $endgroup$
        – Bladewood
        Jul 4 at 17:23




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
        $endgroup$
        – Kitegi
        Jul 5 at 8:34




        $begingroup$
        This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
        $endgroup$
        – Kitegi
        Jul 5 at 8:34











        4












        $begingroup$

        Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.




        Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
        Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          4












          $begingroup$

          Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.




          Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
          Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.




            Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
            Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.




            Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
            Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jul 5 at 2:39

























            answered Jul 5 at 2:29









            LucianLucian

            41.8k1 gold badge60 silver badges131 bronze badges




            41.8k1 gold badge60 silver badges131 bronze badges





















                3












                $begingroup$

                For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Martin R
                  Jul 4 at 7:48







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mathreadler
                  Jul 4 at 7:50















                3












                $begingroup$

                For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Martin R
                  Jul 4 at 7:48







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mathreadler
                  Jul 4 at 7:50













                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jul 4 at 7:49

























                answered Jul 4 at 7:45









                mathreadlermathreadler

                16.2k8 gold badges22 silver badges63 bronze badges




                16.2k8 gold badges22 silver badges63 bronze badges







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Martin R
                  Jul 4 at 7:48







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mathreadler
                  Jul 4 at 7:50












                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Martin R
                  Jul 4 at 7:48







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mathreadler
                  Jul 4 at 7:50







                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Jul 4 at 7:48





                $begingroup$
                The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Jul 4 at 7:48





                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                $endgroup$
                – mathreadler
                Jul 4 at 7:50




                $begingroup$
                @MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
                $endgroup$
                – mathreadler
                Jul 4 at 7:50











                1












                $begingroup$

                For all real $k$ we obtain:
                $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
                Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.



                For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
                $$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
                $$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
                We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
                $$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
                $$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  For all real $k$ we obtain:
                  $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                  $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                  $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
                  Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.



                  For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
                  $$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
                  $$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
                  We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
                  $$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
                  $$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    For all real $k$ we obtain:
                    $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
                    Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.



                    For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
                    $$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
                    $$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
                    We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
                    $$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    For all real $k$ we obtain:
                    $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
                    Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.



                    For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
                    $$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
                    $$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
                    We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
                    $$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
                    $$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jul 5 at 1:11

























                    answered Jul 4 at 8:08









                    Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

                    119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges




                    119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        For an investigative approach:



                        Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.



                        Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.



                        Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.



                        Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          For an investigative approach:



                          Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.



                          Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.



                          Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.



                          Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            For an investigative approach:



                            Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.



                            Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.



                            Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.



                            Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            For an investigative approach:



                            Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.



                            Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.



                            Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.



                            Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jul 4 at 7:58









                            PixelPixel

                            5,9874 gold badges24 silver badges54 bronze badges




                            5,9874 gold badges24 silver badges54 bronze badges



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3282632%2fhow-to-factor-a-fourth-degree-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?