How to factor a fourth degree polynomialRoots of $z^4 + 2z^3 + 20z + 12 = 0$How can I factor in an extra player on a percentage split?How can I re-arrange this equation?Factoring a couple $5$th degree polynomialsShow that $(n - 1)2^n+1 + 2 + (n+1)2^n+1 = n(2^n+2)+2$Rewriting solution in terms of hyperbolic trigsFactoring the quartic polynomial $x^4-2x^2+1$Finding an nth degree polynomial.How to show algebraically that $x^3 +3x +1$ is injective?Finding the value of k in a matrixHow to divide a polynomial by a binomial using factoring when there could be a “remainder”
Replacements for swear words
Crowbar circuit causes unexpected behavior for op amp circuit
What is temperature on a quantum level
Machine learning and operations research projects
What's the fastest way to get Hard To Borrow (HTB) stocks?
Supporting developers who insist on using their pet language
Was the Ford Model T black because of the speed black paint dries?
What would be the ideal melee weapon made of "Phase Metal"?
Shortest distance around a pyramid
How do I take a fraction to a negative power?
Why is dry soil hydrophobic? Bad gardener paradox
Optimising Table wrapping over a Select
Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?
How might the United Kingdom become a republic?
Would letting a multiclass character rebuild their character to be single-classed be game-breaking?
What's a moment that's more impactful on a reread called?
How do I determine whether a permit is required for a new gas line?
Why can't supermassive black holes merge? (or can they?)
Cubic programming and beyond?
If a specific mass of air is polluted, will the pollution stick with it?
Can I call 112 to check a police officer's identity in the Czech Republic?
Filtering fine silt/mud from water (not necessarily bacteria etc.)
Reverse the word order in string, without reversing the words
Is purchasing foreign currency before going abroad a losing proposition?
How to factor a fourth degree polynomial
Roots of $z^4 + 2z^3 + 20z + 12 = 0$How can I factor in an extra player on a percentage split?How can I re-arrange this equation?Factoring a couple $5$th degree polynomialsShow that $(n - 1)2^n+1 + 2 + (n+1)2^n+1 = n(2^n+2)+2$Rewriting solution in terms of hyperbolic trigsFactoring the quartic polynomial $x^4-2x^2+1$Finding an nth degree polynomial.How to show algebraically that $x^3 +3x +1$ is injective?Finding the value of k in a matrixHow to divide a polynomial by a binomial using factoring when there could be a “remainder”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:
$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$
I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:
$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$
I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:
$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$
I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations
$endgroup$
I'm working on a math problem but I am having a hard time figuring out the method used by my textbook to make this factorization:
$$x^4 + 10x^3 + 39x^2 + 70x + 50 = (x^2 + 4x + 5)(x^2 + 6x + 10)$$
I've tried to see if this equation can be factored by grouping or by long division to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations
algebra-precalculus factoring quartic-equations
edited Jul 4 at 9:48
Michael Rozenberg
119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges
119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges
asked Jul 4 at 7:30
LoopLoop
1235 bronze badges
1235 bronze badges
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:
- one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
- the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.
For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:
$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$
where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)
$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$
Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let
$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$
Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well
$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$
The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.
Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all real $k$ we obtain:
$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.
For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
$$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an investigative approach:
Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.
Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.
Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.
Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3282632%2fhow-to-factor-a-fourth-degree-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:
- one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
- the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.
For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:
$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$
where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)
$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$
Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:
- one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
- the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.
For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:
$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$
where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)
$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$
Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:
- one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
- the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.
For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:
$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$
where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)
$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$
Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.
$endgroup$
The only really general way of which I am aware is to guess at the form of the factorization. Since it is monic (the highest term has coefficient 1), you know that the factors should also be so. Thus, there are really only 2 possible factorizations you need to think of, at least at start, which may then be further reducible through easier methods. If we denote the polynomial by $P(x)$, we produce the following candidate factorization equations:
- one is factorization to a linear term and cubic term, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x + a)(x^3 + b_2 x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
- the other is factorization to two quadratic terms, i.e.
$$P(x) = (x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0)$$
The "obvious" next case of this would simply result in now getting a third-degree polynomial on the left and first on the right, but that's just case 1 thanks to the commutative property, so this is exhaustive. The second case is what you have here. The first case is most easily tested and solved by a simple application of the rational root theorem which will, if it's possible, give the value for $a$ - followed by a polynomial long division to get the rest.
For the second case, there isn't really a much better method than to just multiply it all out:
$$(x^2 + a_1 x + a_0)(x^2 + b_1 x + b_0) = x^4 + c_3 x^3 + c_2 x^2 + c_1 x + c_0$$
where we've introduced for notational cleanliness (I had the computer multiply this out for me because it's there)
$$c_3 := a_1 + b_1$$
$$c_2 := a_0 + a_1 b_1 + b_0$$
$$c_1 := a_1 b_0 + a_0 b_1$$
$$c_0 := a_0 b_0$$
Then you just set the $c_j$ equal to the appropriate coefficient values read off from the terms of the given polynomial (i.e. $c_0 = 50$ in your given example), and try to find whole number values for $a_j$ and $b_j$ that work. You'd probably want to start with $c_3$ and $c_0$ first.
edited Jul 4 at 7:48
answered Jul 4 at 7:42
The_SympathizerThe_Sympathizer
10.2k3 gold badges29 silver badges51 bronze badges
10.2k3 gold badges29 silver badges51 bronze badges
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
|
show 1 more comment
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
7
7
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
A really good explaination!
$endgroup$
– Emilia314
Jul 4 at 7:47
1
1
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
@Emilia314 : aww thanks :) #Mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 4 at 7:47
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
Awesome! I was able to use the value of a0b0 to help me solve for the constants. Thank you so much for your help. Is there a specific name for this method?
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 20:07
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
$begingroup$
@Loop : Thanks. a warm little #Mehhr to little Youzzle, too :) #mehhr.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
Jul 5 at 1:49
1
1
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
$begingroup$
A further clue is to see that there are no sign changes in the coefficients, so there can be no positive roots.
$endgroup$
– richard1941
Jul 9 at 19:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let
$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$
Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well
$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$
The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let
$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$
Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well
$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$
The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let
$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$
Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well
$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$
The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$
$endgroup$
Let
$$f (x) = x^4 + 10 x^3 + 39 x^2 + 70 x + 50$$
Converting to a depressed quartic see here, we see that the $x$ term drops out as well
$$fleft(x-frac52right)=x^4+frac3 x^22+frac2516=left(x^2+frac54right)^2-x^2=left(x^2+frac54+xright)left(x^2+frac54-xright)$$
The factorization of $f$ is obtained by replacing $x$ with $x+frac52$
edited Jul 4 at 19:06
answered Jul 4 at 11:41
LozengesLozenges
1,2895 silver badges8 bronze badges
1,2895 silver badges8 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
1
1
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
(+1) I think you should mention how you obtain that $-frac52$ term.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:53
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
$begingroup$
@Bladewood Thank you. I added a link
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
Jul 4 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$
$endgroup$
Hint: Make the ansatz $$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$$
Expanding the right-hand side
$$x^4+x^3(a+c)+x^2(b+d+ac)+x(bc+ad)+bd$$
And you will get
$$a+c=10,b+d+ac=39,bc+ad=70,bd=50$$
edited Jul 4 at 17:23
answered Jul 4 at 7:37
Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner
84.8k4 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges
84.8k4 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
$begingroup$
Definitely the way to do this.
$endgroup$
– EpsilonDelta
Jul 4 at 7:39
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Thank you! How would I determine the constants a and c? My initial instinct was to follow the quartic form and have ax^4+bx^3...=0
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:42
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
Start with $bd$ is a factorization of $50$. Each such factorization gives you that $ac$ is a factorization of $ac = 30-b-d$ (the second equation among the coefficients) and you already have $a+c = 10$ to quickly reject candidates.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jul 4 at 16:37
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
$begingroup$
I think you meant 39 there, not 30.
$endgroup$
– Bladewood
Jul 4 at 17:23
1
1
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
$begingroup$
This is true for any quartic, though, and they're generally messy to solve. How does this make solving it easier?
$endgroup$
– Kitegi
Jul 5 at 8:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.
Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.
Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.
Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$
$endgroup$
Sometimes the best way to proving that $A=B$ is to simply forget all about $B,$ and just have a lot of fun independently exploring the beauty of $A$ anew, with fresh eyes, for one's own intellectual pleasure, without having any needless worries concerning the much expected arrival at point $B$ menacingly hovering over one's mind, as a dark cloud, of sorts. This is basically the mathematical equivalent of the well-worn philosophical adage about a true traveler not knowing his destination.
Now, any road, no matter how long, begins with a simple step. So, what if I were to simply tell you that $$(x+a)^2=x^2+2ax+a^2~?$$ You'd probably say that, apart from being painfully obvious, it is also of no practical use to us, since we are dealing with a fourth degree $($or quartic$)$ expression, rather than a humble quadratic. But what if we'd replace $x$ by $x^2$ ? Then the polynomial expression would soon become $$(x^2+a)^2=x^4+2ax^2+a^2,$$ bringing it much closer to our intended form for $A(x)$. Just two “small” problems: $39$ is odd, and $50$ is not a perfect square. So let's put this on pause for a second, and take a look at the remaining two terms, $10x^3+70x:$ is there nothing that can be done here ? “Well, sure there is!”, you might retort. “Both share a common factor, $10x.$” So let's see where that takes us, shall we ? $$10x^3+70x=10x~(x^2+7).$$ But, wait a second here, doesn't the latter expression, $x^2+7,$ look suspiciously similar to our initial one, $x^2+a$ ? In which case, $a^2=7^2=49,$ which comes incredibly close to our original $50=49+1,$ and $2a=2cdot7=14,$ whose difference until $39$ is $39-14=25=5^2,$ which $($remaining$)$ coefficient fits ever so nicely with the $x^2$ it multiplies. Wrapping it all up, the polynomial becomes $$A(x)=(x^2+7)^2+2cdot5x~(x^2+7)+(5x)^2+1,$$ at which point the factoring $A(x)=Big[(x^2+7)+5xBig]^2+1$ should become rather transparent.
Further writing $1=-i^2,$ and using $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b),$ we eventually obtain $$A(x)=(x^2+5x+7-i)~(x^2+5x+7+i).$$ Since $(7-i)~(7+i)=7^2-i^2=49+1=50,$ we are most likely looking for something like $$A(x)=Big[x^2+(5-n)~x+pBig]cdotBig[x^2+(5+n)~x+qBig],$$ with $pq=50$. $($Would you like me to finish this for you, or do you, by any chance, already feel confident enough to take it from here $?).$
edited Jul 5 at 2:39
answered Jul 5 at 2:29
LucianLucian
41.8k1 gold badge60 silver badges131 bronze badges
41.8k1 gold badge60 silver badges131 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.
$endgroup$
For real valued rational roots you can use the rational root theorem.
edited Jul 4 at 7:49
answered Jul 4 at 7:45
mathreadlermathreadler
16.2k8 gold badges22 silver badges63 bronze badges
16.2k8 gold badges22 silver badges63 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
1
1
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
$begingroup$
The rational root theorem helps to find rational roots, not real roots. But I don't think that this polynomial has real roots at all.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jul 4 at 7:48
1
1
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
$begingroup$
@MartinR yep you are right. It doesn't. But it's a good tool in the toolbox.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Jul 4 at 7:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all real $k$ we obtain:
$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.
For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
$$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all real $k$ we obtain:
$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.
For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
$$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all real $k$ we obtain:
$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.
For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
$$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$
$endgroup$
For all real $k$ we obtain:
$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-25x^2-k^2-10kx-2kx^2+39x^2+70x+50=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+k)^2-((2k-14)x^2+(10k-70)x+k^2-50).$$
Now, we'll choose $k$ such that we'll get a difference of squares.
For which we need $$25(k-7)^2-(2k-14)(k^2-50)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(2k^2-25k+75)=0$$ or
$$(k-7)(k-5)(2k-15)=0.$$
We see that only $k=7.5$ is valid and we obtain:
$$$x^4+10x^3+39x^2+70x+50=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x^2+5x+6.25)=$$
$$=(x^2+5x+7.5)^2-(x+2.5)^2=(x^2+4x+5)(x^2+6x+10).$$
edited Jul 5 at 1:11
answered Jul 4 at 8:08
Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg
119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges
119k20 gold badges104 silver badges209 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an investigative approach:
Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.
Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.
Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.
Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an investigative approach:
Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.
Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.
Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.
Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an investigative approach:
Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.
Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.
Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.
Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.
$endgroup$
For an investigative approach:
Since the coefficient of $x^4$ is 1, you know both your quadratics must start with $x^2$.
Now look at the factors of 50, which are 1, 50 or 2, 25 or 5, 10, so you have a basis from which to make an educated guess for the quadratic's constant terms.
Next, you will need two coefficients of $x$ for your quadratics that will sum to the coefficient of $10x^3$ in your original polynomial.
Expanding the ansatz approach will give you the exact conditions required.
answered Jul 4 at 7:58
PixelPixel
5,9874 gold badges24 silver badges54 bronze badges
5,9874 gold badges24 silver badges54 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3282632%2fhow-to-factor-a-fourth-degree-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@EpsilonDelta Yes, it looks like the mistake was corrected. I meant to say 5 terms, not 5th degree.
$endgroup$
– Loop
Jul 4 at 7:38
$begingroup$
A related question.
$endgroup$
– Lucian
Jul 7 at 16:22