Ttdfjt

Your problem is that you're not separating two completely different things:

• The difficulty making up the 2-4 hours that you're spending on
  learning a foreign language.


• Your coworker operating under a different set of rules than you.

Those two have nothing to do with one another. If you forced your coworker to follow the rules, you're still going to be in the same boat.

The problem is, you're letting envy of your coworker's situation cloud your focus. Forget about the coworker. The question you need to ask yourself is, would you rather:

• Spend a few extra hours in the office each week (not working extra
  hours; the extra time is actually learning a foreign language)


• Leave at a regular time but not learn a foreign language.

Your coworker literally has nothing to do with your choice. The dynamic between him and the company doesn't play into that choice, and isn't really any of your business. If it makes you feel better, he's making a terrible choice: at the gain of a few extra hours each week, he's likely going to permanently sour his relationship at the company - HR will find out at some point, and the longer it takes, the less likely he'll get away with "But nobody told me!" as an excuse.

Your colleague is wilfully committing fraud. Or whatever the non-monetary equivalent to fraud is. The behaviour is dishonest and therefore fair game to deal with as your wish.

Feel free to report his behaviour to HR. Don't bother with your manager as he (rightly or wrongly) clearly doesn't care for the rule and has no particular incentive to enforce it.

If you do this then: a) remind HR that he is a colleague and that you would like to remain anonymous. b) remember that HR might be stupid enough to give away your identity even after you ask them not to.

You could try to do something more subtle to try and draw attention to the discrepancy but I wouldn't bother if I were you. Either ignore the issue (it isn't your problem per se so this is a fine approach) or deal with it directly and rat him out. The middle ground is not a friendly space. e.g. addressing your colleague directly carries a higher risk of friction along with a much lower chance of the problem going away.

The other answers are perfectly fine and acceptable, but I believe they all fail to take into account OP's feelings of being cheated. It doesn't matter that the other guy is cheating the company, it doesn't matter that OP has to stay 2-4 hours extra to make up the time.

What matters is the other guy is cheating OP, knowingly and on purpose. Why should he get to leave while OP has to stay back.

Leaving it be will not solve the burning ball in your gut. Talking to him will be even less fruitful. No sane person, let alone an asshat like that one would gladly and willingly forfeit 4 hours of their free time where they didn't have to before.

If I were in your shoes OP I'd definitely report him. Probably escalating to your manager will be enough, or you might need to go and ask HR "Hey how come I have to stay ..." The point is EF that guy!

I'm going to go against the majority of answers and say that your co-worker is not committing fraud or even being unethical.

You state that the language classes occur during normal working hours at the job location. I assume that the language(s) being taught are for the purpose of making the employees more productive? Given all these factors, I think it is perfectly reasonable for him to assume that he should be paid for these hours. He might have even taken this benefit into consideration when accepting the job. Until HR tells him otherwise, I think he is justified in continuing to count those hours.

I don't know about European labor laws, but in the USA he would still be risking getting fired if HR discovers what he's doing.

I advise you to mind your own business. He's not doing anything wrong.

Email to HR (from you, or your manager, depending on how the politics are working in your company) with one of these:

1. Dear HR person: please can you confirm whether the rule about making up hours spent on language lessons (etc) is still in effect? as I understand from John Smith (new hire in the Q department) that this is no longer being communicated as a requirement so we would appreciate some clarification around this policy. (then go to (2) if they reply that this is still the policy and don't take it up with him.)




2. Dear HR person: I understand from John Smith that he has not received the information about making up hours spent on language lessons (etc), I have outlined the policy to him but is it possible for you to supply the official information please?

I'm pretty sure that the policy still applies, especially since you said that you queried it with your manager and they were ok with it but HR wasn't. (I won't comment about my opinion on this policy, as that isn't really relevant to the answer..lets just say my opinion isn't positive, assuming the language lessons are of benefit to the company). This way you are re-casting it as an oversight/innocent mistake in the process (while acknowledging the policy may have changed!) rather than blaming it on 'John'.

I'm assuming that 'John' doesn't have any specific agreement with the company (since surely he would have said if he'd negotiated that agreement away, rather than just saying he won't comply since he wasn't told about it) and consequently, that as HR want it to be enforced on you, that they would equally want it to be enforced on John.

Edited to add:

Thinking about this a bit more... I wonder if it's possible that HR expects the manager to communicate this info to their direct report, as part of "on-boarding" a new hire (since you say that the course was already running at that point).

And when your manager checked again (I'm assuming this part) with HR about your query, they (HR) were thinking that it was a general question about the policy at that point and whether it still applies.

It doesn't change the advice above, really, other than I think you (or, really, your manager) need to get it made clear whether it's the line-manager or the HR that should be giving this info to new hires.

At places I've worked it's been about 50/50 whether it's the line-manager, or HR, who would have the responsibility for communicating this kind of thing to the new person.

If it is in fact the case that HR are expecting the manager (rather than HR) to communicate that -- it's likely to become clear from their response to either (1) or (2) above.

In any case, regardless of any of the above I think it's fairly clear that your new colleague seems like the type to seek out technicalities, loopholes, etc so in your position I would be wary of that in his other behaviour at work, although I don't think there's anything you can directly do about that right now.

If I'm right with any of this then you have 2 issues: 1) unclear processes/responsibilities (that should be easy to clear up in any normal organisation) and 2) this co-worker who will use technicalities etc to "rules-lawyer" situations. You need to treat these 2 issues separately.

EDIT My original wording suggested you should outright report it. Edited view is that you should still at least discuss with him. Since this is probably a finite case, letting it be known that one constantly getting away with something everyone else has to follow isn't cool may be where to leave it.

If this is an ongoing training, then I'd still consider escalating. Eventually more will notice he's leaving earlier and that's going to wear on people.

Tell him you are going to report this if he doesn’t cease this practice. If he doesn’t cease this, then report it. If you want to be a little softer about it, begin with explaining why this is difficult for the rest of the team to watch him get special treatment.

Most likely, he won’t like it and will blame you. So be it. His childish behavior is selfish to say the least and entirely oblivious to his impacts to others or the concepts of fairness. If he’s fine with this, what else is he going to quietly let you take on for his own benefit? He is causing a poor work environment by taking advantage of a technicality—one that may not even be valid—while quite willingly letting all around him work more under different rules. Your manager should be upset with him. It’s hard to keep a team working happily together when one member is receiving preferential treatment.

Maybe the guy is hired for 3/4 of the time?

I would ignore the issue and mind my own business. For a few reasons. One of them (experiencing from attending similar course) is that those rules are usually stated in agreement you get when you sign for that course. So that HR e-mail is just a reminder. Saying that you didn't get the memo so you are excerpted from the rules is a good way to get fired.

Second thing is that if his work is done in less than those 40 hours then maybe there's no need for him to be employed?
It should be his manager role to keep track of his people. If he don't do that then employee taking advantage expose this manager lack of managing skills (as I assume you have two different managers, otherwise you would rise the issue with yours).

Third thing would be to ask your HR is the courses could be held before or after typical working hours so the work can be arranged to be more smoothly (as you can imagine it's quite bad to say "we cannot held a call at 1 pm because Lucas learn French then for an hour).

Much as I like the "mind your own business" attitude, I don't think it applies here.

If my colleague was paid more than me for no apparent reason, I'd mind my own business. If my colleague was being knowingly dishonest, it would by of my concern. I have the right to work in an atmosphere of trust which is impossible when such people are around.

You have the right to work in a healthy atmosphere too, and if you care about it, you should report your colleague to HR.

Is there anything more intelligent that I can do besides what I did till now, i.e., ignoring this issue and minding my own business?

No, there is nothing you should do other than minding your own business. Your colleague cheating the system is his problem, not yours and eventually it will catch up to him. Ratting out your colleague won't solve your problem about recovering hours and it will likely cause more problems as you might be seen as untrustworthy by your coworkers.

As for the hours that you are struggling to recover, if it is such a struggle to recover these hours then my suggestion is to stop attending the course during working hours. While it is nice that the company provides these courses, in your case the benefits do not seem to outweigh all the problems you are having because if it.

You should also consider asking management to hold the courses at a time when it will not affect your working hours if you really want to attend them. The worst that they can say is no.