An iteration formula I found (please don't jump at me if it's already been discovered)

Can I enter a rental property without giving notice if I'm afraid a tenant may be hurt?

Did silent film actors actually say their lines or did they simply improvise “dialogue” while being filmed?

Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

How to check a file was encrypted (really & correctly)

Generate a random point outside a given rectangle within a map

The actual purview of Her Majesty The Queen's Perogative?

Why should I "believe in" weak solutions to PDEs?

Which genus do I use for neutral expressions in German?

Is it true that control+alt+delete only became a thing because IBM would not build Bill Gates a computer with a task manager button?

Differentiability of operator norm

How does current flow in this path when all points are at the same potential?

Where to pee in London?

Should I take out a personal loan to pay off credit card debt?

How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?

What word best describes someone who likes to do everything on his own?

Best way to explain to my boss that I cannot attend a team summit because it is on Rosh Hashana or any other Jewish Holiday

Are certificates without DNS fundamentally flawed?

What are the examples (applications) of the MIPs in which the objective function has nonzero coefficients for only continuous variables?

Does the spell "Silence" affect the caster?

What is the bio-mechanical plausibility of a fox with venomous fangs?

Is a switch from R to Python worth it?

Why is Chromosome 1 called Chromosome 1?



An iteration formula I found (please don't jump at me if it's already been discovered)







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


<span class=$sin^2 theta$">



Where the modulus-like symbol actually denotes iteration of a radical function. Sorry for the messy work everyone- I am new to this stuff, and I literally just found this iteration formula like 15 minutes ago. $X[i]$ starts as being an arbitrary number greater than $n!/(n-2)!$ which I should have mentioned earlier but didn't have space to (apologies).
So the business is: you start with a number e.g. 1, then if you want to find say $50$, you compute $sqrt(1 + 50!/48!)$ then replace $1$ on your calculator with the result you just got a.k.a. $Ans$ etc. and keep iterating till you get (at a surprisingly fast convergence rate!) the very number you started with, n.



I appreciate this might not be the most interesting insight or $n!/(n-2)!$ is probably just me not realising that it could also be presented as $n(n-1) = n^2-n$. But still, please don't mass-downvote it all, remember it's a 15-year old person who figured this out...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
    $endgroup$
    – quasi
    Jul 27 at 22:05











  • $begingroup$
    Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:41

















2












$begingroup$


<span class=$sin^2 theta$">



Where the modulus-like symbol actually denotes iteration of a radical function. Sorry for the messy work everyone- I am new to this stuff, and I literally just found this iteration formula like 15 minutes ago. $X[i]$ starts as being an arbitrary number greater than $n!/(n-2)!$ which I should have mentioned earlier but didn't have space to (apologies).
So the business is: you start with a number e.g. 1, then if you want to find say $50$, you compute $sqrt(1 + 50!/48!)$ then replace $1$ on your calculator with the result you just got a.k.a. $Ans$ etc. and keep iterating till you get (at a surprisingly fast convergence rate!) the very number you started with, n.



I appreciate this might not be the most interesting insight or $n!/(n-2)!$ is probably just me not realising that it could also be presented as $n(n-1) = n^2-n$. But still, please don't mass-downvote it all, remember it's a 15-year old person who figured this out...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
    $endgroup$
    – quasi
    Jul 27 at 22:05











  • $begingroup$
    Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:41













2












2








2





$begingroup$


<span class=$sin^2 theta$">



Where the modulus-like symbol actually denotes iteration of a radical function. Sorry for the messy work everyone- I am new to this stuff, and I literally just found this iteration formula like 15 minutes ago. $X[i]$ starts as being an arbitrary number greater than $n!/(n-2)!$ which I should have mentioned earlier but didn't have space to (apologies).
So the business is: you start with a number e.g. 1, then if you want to find say $50$, you compute $sqrt(1 + 50!/48!)$ then replace $1$ on your calculator with the result you just got a.k.a. $Ans$ etc. and keep iterating till you get (at a surprisingly fast convergence rate!) the very number you started with, n.



I appreciate this might not be the most interesting insight or $n!/(n-2)!$ is probably just me not realising that it could also be presented as $n(n-1) = n^2-n$. But still, please don't mass-downvote it all, remember it's a 15-year old person who figured this out...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




<span class=$sin^2 theta$">



Where the modulus-like symbol actually denotes iteration of a radical function. Sorry for the messy work everyone- I am new to this stuff, and I literally just found this iteration formula like 15 minutes ago. $X[i]$ starts as being an arbitrary number greater than $n!/(n-2)!$ which I should have mentioned earlier but didn't have space to (apologies).
So the business is: you start with a number e.g. 1, then if you want to find say $50$, you compute $sqrt(1 + 50!/48!)$ then replace $1$ on your calculator with the result you just got a.k.a. $Ans$ etc. and keep iterating till you get (at a surprisingly fast convergence rate!) the very number you started with, n.



I appreciate this might not be the most interesting insight or $n!/(n-2)!$ is probably just me not realising that it could also be presented as $n(n-1) = n^2-n$. But still, please don't mass-downvote it all, remember it's a 15-year old person who figured this out...







conjectures






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 28 at 8:37







Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er

















asked Jul 27 at 21:52









Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱erAvtarás Karîm Elymés̱er

344 bronze badges




344 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
    $endgroup$
    – quasi
    Jul 27 at 22:05











  • $begingroup$
    Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:41












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
    $endgroup$
    – quasi
    Jul 27 at 22:05











  • $begingroup$
    Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:41







1




1




$begingroup$
Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
$endgroup$
– quasi
Jul 27 at 22:05





$begingroup$
Note: $n!/(n-2)!=n(n-1)$, so the factorials are unnecessary.
$endgroup$
– quasi
Jul 27 at 22:05













$begingroup$
Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
$endgroup$
– Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
Jul 28 at 8:41




$begingroup$
Ah right. I kind of realised this earlier on, shouldn't have posted this whole thread I guess ....
$endgroup$
– Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
Jul 28 at 8:41










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

You can do this formally by just looking at
$$sqrtn!/(n-2)!+sqrtn!/(n-2)! + dots$$
and so on to infinity. Suppose this has a limit. Then we'd expect that
$$L=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + L$$
This gives
$$L^2-L=n!/(n-2)!=n^2-n$$
which has the obvious solution of $L=n$.


Analytically, this could be done with some sort of fixpoint theorem (such as the Banach fixed-point theorem), setting
$$f(x)=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + x$$
and using it to show that $lim_mto inftyunderbracef(cdots f(x)cdots)_mtext times$ is the solution to the fixpoint equation
$$f(L)=L.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Jul 27 at 22:25











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:40


















4












$begingroup$

So you're saying that the sequence
$$X_0=1$$
$$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+fracn!(n-2)!$$
tends to towards $n$. Firstly notice that
$$fracn!(n-2)!=n(n-1)=n^2-n$$
Hence your sequence is equivalent to
$$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+n^2-n$$
Then note that for $0le X_klt n$ we have
$$X_kltsqrtX_k+n^2-nlt n$$
So your sequence is strictly increasing and bounded above. Also note that
$$sqrtn+n^2-n=sqrtn^2=n$$
Hence the sequence has a stationary point at $X_k=n$. This is sufficient to prove that for a given initial value $0le X_0le n$ the sequence tends to $n$. In other words
$$lim_ktoinftyX_k=n$$
In fact one can prove that this sequence tends to $n$ for any initial value by also using the fact that $sqrtX_k+n^2-nlt X_k$ when $X_kgt n$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3305985%2fan-iteration-formula-i-found-please-dont-jump-at-me-if-its-already-been-disco%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    You can do this formally by just looking at
    $$sqrtn!/(n-2)!+sqrtn!/(n-2)! + dots$$
    and so on to infinity. Suppose this has a limit. Then we'd expect that
    $$L=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + L$$
    This gives
    $$L^2-L=n!/(n-2)!=n^2-n$$
    which has the obvious solution of $L=n$.


    Analytically, this could be done with some sort of fixpoint theorem (such as the Banach fixed-point theorem), setting
    $$f(x)=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + x$$
    and using it to show that $lim_mto inftyunderbracef(cdots f(x)cdots)_mtext times$ is the solution to the fixpoint equation
    $$f(L)=L.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
      $endgroup$
      – Will Fisher
      Jul 27 at 22:25











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
      Jul 28 at 8:40















    4












    $begingroup$

    You can do this formally by just looking at
    $$sqrtn!/(n-2)!+sqrtn!/(n-2)! + dots$$
    and so on to infinity. Suppose this has a limit. Then we'd expect that
    $$L=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + L$$
    This gives
    $$L^2-L=n!/(n-2)!=n^2-n$$
    which has the obvious solution of $L=n$.


    Analytically, this could be done with some sort of fixpoint theorem (such as the Banach fixed-point theorem), setting
    $$f(x)=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + x$$
    and using it to show that $lim_mto inftyunderbracef(cdots f(x)cdots)_mtext times$ is the solution to the fixpoint equation
    $$f(L)=L.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
      $endgroup$
      – Will Fisher
      Jul 27 at 22:25











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
      Jul 28 at 8:40













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    You can do this formally by just looking at
    $$sqrtn!/(n-2)!+sqrtn!/(n-2)! + dots$$
    and so on to infinity. Suppose this has a limit. Then we'd expect that
    $$L=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + L$$
    This gives
    $$L^2-L=n!/(n-2)!=n^2-n$$
    which has the obvious solution of $L=n$.


    Analytically, this could be done with some sort of fixpoint theorem (such as the Banach fixed-point theorem), setting
    $$f(x)=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + x$$
    and using it to show that $lim_mto inftyunderbracef(cdots f(x)cdots)_mtext times$ is the solution to the fixpoint equation
    $$f(L)=L.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You can do this formally by just looking at
    $$sqrtn!/(n-2)!+sqrtn!/(n-2)! + dots$$
    and so on to infinity. Suppose this has a limit. Then we'd expect that
    $$L=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + L$$
    This gives
    $$L^2-L=n!/(n-2)!=n^2-n$$
    which has the obvious solution of $L=n$.


    Analytically, this could be done with some sort of fixpoint theorem (such as the Banach fixed-point theorem), setting
    $$f(x)=sqrtn!/(n-2)! + x$$
    and using it to show that $lim_mto inftyunderbracef(cdots f(x)cdots)_mtext times$ is the solution to the fixpoint equation
    $$f(L)=L.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jul 27 at 22:01









    Will FisherWill Fisher

    4,1481 gold badge11 silver badges32 bronze badges




    4,1481 gold badge11 silver badges32 bronze badges










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
      $endgroup$
      – Will Fisher
      Jul 27 at 22:25











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
      Jul 28 at 8:40












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
      $endgroup$
      – Will Fisher
      Jul 27 at 22:25











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
      Jul 28 at 8:40







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Jul 27 at 22:25





    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman My answer was just for intuition, hence why I say "formally" and "suppose this has a limit." I gave the fleshing of an analytical proof if the OP wanted to prove it rigorously.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Jul 27 at 22:25













    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:40




    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much- it's just fine, I didn't particularly ask for the utmost of mathematical vigour. But I like your answer, and I appreciate the time you've taken to show this. Interesting ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Avtarás Karîm Elymés̱er
    Jul 28 at 8:40













    4












    $begingroup$

    So you're saying that the sequence
    $$X_0=1$$
    $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+fracn!(n-2)!$$
    tends to towards $n$. Firstly notice that
    $$fracn!(n-2)!=n(n-1)=n^2-n$$
    Hence your sequence is equivalent to
    $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+n^2-n$$
    Then note that for $0le X_klt n$ we have
    $$X_kltsqrtX_k+n^2-nlt n$$
    So your sequence is strictly increasing and bounded above. Also note that
    $$sqrtn+n^2-n=sqrtn^2=n$$
    Hence the sequence has a stationary point at $X_k=n$. This is sufficient to prove that for a given initial value $0le X_0le n$ the sequence tends to $n$. In other words
    $$lim_ktoinftyX_k=n$$
    In fact one can prove that this sequence tends to $n$ for any initial value by also using the fact that $sqrtX_k+n^2-nlt X_k$ when $X_kgt n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      4












      $begingroup$

      So you're saying that the sequence
      $$X_0=1$$
      $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+fracn!(n-2)!$$
      tends to towards $n$. Firstly notice that
      $$fracn!(n-2)!=n(n-1)=n^2-n$$
      Hence your sequence is equivalent to
      $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+n^2-n$$
      Then note that for $0le X_klt n$ we have
      $$X_kltsqrtX_k+n^2-nlt n$$
      So your sequence is strictly increasing and bounded above. Also note that
      $$sqrtn+n^2-n=sqrtn^2=n$$
      Hence the sequence has a stationary point at $X_k=n$. This is sufficient to prove that for a given initial value $0le X_0le n$ the sequence tends to $n$. In other words
      $$lim_ktoinftyX_k=n$$
      In fact one can prove that this sequence tends to $n$ for any initial value by also using the fact that $sqrtX_k+n^2-nlt X_k$ when $X_kgt n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        So you're saying that the sequence
        $$X_0=1$$
        $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+fracn!(n-2)!$$
        tends to towards $n$. Firstly notice that
        $$fracn!(n-2)!=n(n-1)=n^2-n$$
        Hence your sequence is equivalent to
        $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+n^2-n$$
        Then note that for $0le X_klt n$ we have
        $$X_kltsqrtX_k+n^2-nlt n$$
        So your sequence is strictly increasing and bounded above. Also note that
        $$sqrtn+n^2-n=sqrtn^2=n$$
        Hence the sequence has a stationary point at $X_k=n$. This is sufficient to prove that for a given initial value $0le X_0le n$ the sequence tends to $n$. In other words
        $$lim_ktoinftyX_k=n$$
        In fact one can prove that this sequence tends to $n$ for any initial value by also using the fact that $sqrtX_k+n^2-nlt X_k$ when $X_kgt n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        So you're saying that the sequence
        $$X_0=1$$
        $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+fracn!(n-2)!$$
        tends to towards $n$. Firstly notice that
        $$fracn!(n-2)!=n(n-1)=n^2-n$$
        Hence your sequence is equivalent to
        $$X_k+1=sqrtX_k+n^2-n$$
        Then note that for $0le X_klt n$ we have
        $$X_kltsqrtX_k+n^2-nlt n$$
        So your sequence is strictly increasing and bounded above. Also note that
        $$sqrtn+n^2-n=sqrtn^2=n$$
        Hence the sequence has a stationary point at $X_k=n$. This is sufficient to prove that for a given initial value $0le X_0le n$ the sequence tends to $n$. In other words
        $$lim_ktoinftyX_k=n$$
        In fact one can prove that this sequence tends to $n$ for any initial value by also using the fact that $sqrtX_k+n^2-nlt X_k$ when $X_kgt n$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 27 at 22:18

























        answered Jul 27 at 22:06









        Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

        14.2k1 gold badge5 silver badges31 bronze badges




        14.2k1 gold badge5 silver badges31 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3305985%2fan-iteration-formula-i-found-please-dont-jump-at-me-if-its-already-been-disco%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

            Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

            Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림