How do you formulate the 連用中止 with 形容動詞 (な adjectives) and 名詞 (nouns)?いAdjective. difference between くて and くListing modifiers with 〜でありJoining adjectives with し before a nounWhat is the し particle and how do you use it?Difference between て-form and と/や for connecting adjectives/verbsHow are the suffixes ーまる and ーめる used?Order of multiple nouns and adjectives modifying the same nounWhy does the い-adjective require -さ conversion to match ～そうです？When の follows particlesGrammar justification for 連用形 ＋ 係助詞「は」＋（ない・ある）Did I translate the て-form correctly in this sentence?Can I say 「うれしかったことは ○ ものです」 where ○ is not in past tense?
What's the "magic similar to the Knock spell" referenced in the Dungeon of the Mad Mage adventure?
Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?
Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?
Can a planet still function with a damaged moon?
resoldering copper waste pipe
And now you see it II (the B side)
Was Mohammed the most popular first name for boys born in Berlin in 2018?
Narcissistic cube asks who are we?
How can I make parentheses stick to formula?
Identity of a supposed anonymous referee revealed through "Description" of the report
Why does the electron wavefunction not collapse within atoms at room temperature in gas, liquids or solids due to decoherence?
Why Faces eat each other?
if i accidentally leaked my schools ip address and someone d doses my school am i at fault
Has there been evidence of any other gods?
Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?
Why do 3D printers have only one limit switch?
How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?
What is the Ancient One's mistake?
Using wilcox.test() and t.test() in R yielding different p-values
Compactness in normed vector spaces.
Do Rabbis admit emotional involvement in their rulings?
How does weapons training transfer to empty hand?
Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech
Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?
How do you formulate the 連用中止 with 形容動詞 (な adjectives) and 名詞 (nouns)?
いAdjective. difference between くて and くListing modifiers with 〜でありJoining adjectives with し before a nounWhat is the し particle and how do you use it?Difference between て-form and と/や for connecting adjectives/verbsHow are the suffixes ーまる and ーめる used?Order of multiple nouns and adjectives modifying the same nounWhy does the い-adjective require -さ conversion to match ～そうです？When の follows particlesGrammar justification for 連用形 ＋ 係助詞「は」＋（ない・ある）Did I translate the て-form correctly in this sentence?Can I say 「うれしかったことは ○ ものです」 where ○ is not in past tense?
According to my textbook, verb and i-adjective sentences can be chained with the 連用中止【れんようちゅうし】 form like this:
Later on, I came across this exercise where I'm required to replace the adjectives' endings by the corresponding 連用中止. But I do not know how to turn 静かで into 連用中止 in the following sentence:
北海道【ほっかいどう】の7月の海は、深【ふか】く、青【あお】く、静【しず】か ___、絵のように美しかった。
Is this feasible? What about sentences that end with a noun?
Thank you very much
grammar renyōkei
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
add a comment |
According to my textbook, verb and i-adjective sentences can be chained with the 連用中止【れんようちゅうし】 form like this:
Later on, I came across this exercise where I'm required to replace the adjectives' endings by the corresponding 連用中止. But I do not know how to turn 静かで into 連用中止 in the following sentence:
北海道【ほっかいどう】の7月の海は、深【ふか】く、青【あお】く、静【しず】か ___、絵のように美しかった。
Is this feasible? What about sentences that end with a noun?
Thank you very much
grammar renyōkei
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
add a comment |
According to my textbook, verb and i-adjective sentences can be chained with the 連用中止【れんようちゅうし】 form like this:
Later on, I came across this exercise where I'm required to replace the adjectives' endings by the corresponding 連用中止. But I do not know how to turn 静かで into 連用中止 in the following sentence:
北海道【ほっかいどう】の7月の海は、深【ふか】く、青【あお】く、静【しず】か ___、絵のように美しかった。
Is this feasible? What about sentences that end with a noun?
Thank you very much
grammar renyōkei
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
According to my textbook, verb and i-adjective sentences can be chained with the 連用中止【れんようちゅうし】 form like this:
Later on, I came across this exercise where I'm required to replace the adjectives' endings by the corresponding 連用中止. But I do not know how to turn 静かで into 連用中止 in the following sentence:
北海道【ほっかいどう】の7月の海は、深【ふか】く、青【あお】く、静【しず】か ___、絵のように美しかった。
Is this feasible? What about sentences that end with a noun?
Thank you very much
grammar renyōkei
grammar renyōkei
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
edited May 5 at 21:03
jarmanso7
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
asked May 5 at 16:59
jarmanso7jarmanso7
41914
41914
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, you cannot omit で after 静か. As your textbook clearly says, this grammar is about verbs and i-adjectives.
北海道の7月の海は、深く、青く、静かで、絵のように美しかった。
See: いAdjective. difference between くて and く
EDIT: You can also use copula-like である and say "深く、青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった", too.
You may see two na-adjectives connected without a particle ("簡単、便利なチャットアプリ" instead of "簡単で便利なチャットアプリ"), but this is another story.
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67999%2fhow-do-you-formulate-the-%25e9%2580%25a3%25e7%2594%25a8%25e4%25b8%25ad%25e6%25ad%25a2-with-%25e5%25bd%25a2%25e5%25ae%25b9%25e5%258b%2595%25e8%25a9%259e-%25e3%2581%25aa-adjectives-and-%25e5%2590%258d%25e8%25a9%259e-nouns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, you cannot omit で after 静か. As your textbook clearly says, this grammar is about verbs and i-adjectives.
北海道の7月の海は、深く、青く、静かで、絵のように美しかった。
See: いAdjective. difference between くて and く
EDIT: You can also use copula-like である and say "深く、青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった", too.
You may see two na-adjectives connected without a particle ("簡単、便利なチャットアプリ" instead of "簡単で便利なチャットアプリ"), but this is another story.
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
add a comment |
No, you cannot omit で after 静か. As your textbook clearly says, this grammar is about verbs and i-adjectives.
北海道の7月の海は、深く、青く、静かで、絵のように美しかった。
See: いAdjective. difference between くて and く
EDIT: You can also use copula-like である and say "深く、青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった", too.
You may see two na-adjectives connected without a particle ("簡単、便利なチャットアプリ" instead of "簡単で便利なチャットアプリ"), but this is another story.
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
add a comment |
No, you cannot omit で after 静か. As your textbook clearly says, this grammar is about verbs and i-adjectives.
北海道の7月の海は、深く、青く、静かで、絵のように美しかった。
See: いAdjective. difference between くて and く
EDIT: You can also use copula-like である and say "深く、青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった", too.
You may see two na-adjectives connected without a particle ("簡単、便利なチャットアプリ" instead of "簡単で便利なチャットアプリ"), but this is another story.
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
No, you cannot omit で after 静か. As your textbook clearly says, this grammar is about verbs and i-adjectives.
北海道の7月の海は、深く、青く、静かで、絵のように美しかった。
See: いAdjective. difference between くて and く
EDIT: You can also use copula-like である and say "深く、青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった", too.
You may see two na-adjectives connected without a particle ("簡単、便利なチャットアプリ" instead of "簡単で便利なチャットアプリ"), but this is another story.
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
edited May 5 at 22:31
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
answered May 5 at 19:18
narutonaruto
168k8162320
168k8162320
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
add a comment |
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I see. My intent typing 静か____ was not to ask whether I can omit で or not, but to ask if I can place something there ____ that works similarly for the case of なadjectives. Maybe something along the lines of 「…青く、静かであり、絵のように美しかった」? I am not sure if your answer just points out that omitting で is not possible or you actually want to say that 静かで is the only possible option. Thank you.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 20:55
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
I'm not a native speaker, but 静かであり sounds completely unnatural to me in this context. Also, note that what you are suggesting would involve substituting a shorter, simpler form for 深くて and 青くて, while substituting a longer, more complex form for 静かで. In that sense, you'd be making the terms less parallel, rather than more so.
– Nanigashi
May 5 at 21:14
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Please take a look to this entry and this answer. Thank you for your thoughts on this.
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:19
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
Hmm, what do you mean with less parallel? I mean, to me くて、くて sounds more natural than く、く、 just because I'm used to the former construction, but at the end, both are valid. I don't see why it should'nt be the case with で and であり (provided both are valid, which I'm not sure).
– jarmanso7
May 5 at 21:24
3
3
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
である conjugates like a verb, and "深く、青く、静かであり" sounds completely natural to me. It's stiffer and more bookish than "深くて、青くて、静かで".
– naruto
May 5 at 22:29
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67999%2fhow-do-you-formulate-the-%25e9%2580%25a3%25e7%2594%25a8%25e4%25b8%25ad%25e6%25ad%25a2-with-%25e5%25bd%25a2%25e5%25ae%25b9%25e5%258b%2595%25e8%25a9%259e-%25e3%2581%25aa-adjectives-and-%25e5%2590%258d%25e8%25a9%259e-nouns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
