Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangleLabeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix

Gambler's Fallacy Dice

Does the US Supreme Court vote using secret ballots?

Is it possible to determine from only a photo of a cityscape whether it was taken close with wide angle or from a distance with zoom?

Can a generation ship withstand its own oxygen and daily wear for many thousands of years?

Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin

How would fantasy dwarves exist, realistically?

How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?

Referring to a character in 3rd person when they have amnesia

Pedaling at different gear ratios on flat terrain: what's the point?

Prints each letter of a string in different colors. C#

Cycling to work - 30mile return

Show that the characteristic polynomial is the same as the minimal polynomial

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Quotient of Three Dimensional Torus by Permutation on Coordinates

Why does a table with a defined constant in its index compute 10X slower?

multicol package causes underfull hbox

Why is the S-duct intake on the Tu-154 uniquely oblong?

Alternative classical explanation of the Stern-Gerlach Experiment?

How does this piece of code determine array size without using sizeof( )?

What should I wear to go and sign an employment contract?

Would a "ring language" be possible?

What's is the easiest way to purchase a stock and hold it

What technology would Dwarves need to forge titanium?

Told to apply for UK visa before other visas, on UK-Spain-etc. visit



Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangle


Labeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix













5















I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.



enter image description here



So far, I've tried this:



 documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument









share|improve this question
























  • please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:12












  • please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:23






  • 1





    @Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

    – naveganteX
    May 12 at 21:23















5















I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.



enter image description here



So far, I've tried this:



 documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument









share|improve this question
























  • please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:12












  • please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:23






  • 1





    @Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

    – naveganteX
    May 12 at 21:23













5












5








5








I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.



enter image description here



So far, I've tried this:



 documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument









share|improve this question
















I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.



enter image description here



So far, I've tried this:



 documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument






tikz-pgf






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 12 at 21:29







naveganteX

















asked May 12 at 21:04









naveganteXnaveganteX

1386




1386












  • please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:12












  • please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:23






  • 1





    @Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

    – naveganteX
    May 12 at 21:23

















  • please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:12












  • please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

    – Zarko
    May 12 at 21:23






  • 1





    @Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

    – naveganteX
    May 12 at 21:23
















please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12






please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.

– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12














please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23





please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?

– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23




1




1





@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23





@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.

– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline key in an ordinary equation (and contour for the Sigma). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep and inner ysep. And overlay is used to avoid that the FEATURES node above U does not introduce additional horizontal space.



documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;

~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES

]
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline key in an ordinary equation (and contour for the Sigma). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep and inner ysep. And overlay is used to avoid that the FEATURES node above U does not introduce additional horizontal space.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagecontour
    contourlength1pt
    usepackagetikz
    begindocument
    [ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
    node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
    ([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
    tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
    node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
    draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
    ~times~
    tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
    node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
    picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
    (path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;

    ~times~
    tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
    node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES

    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





























      7














      How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline key in an ordinary equation (and contour for the Sigma). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep and inner ysep. And overlay is used to avoid that the FEATURES node above U does not introduce additional horizontal space.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagecontour
      contourlength1pt
      usepackagetikz
      begindocument
      [ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
      node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
      ([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
      tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
      node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
      draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
      ~times~
      tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
      node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
      picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
      (path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;

      ~times~
      tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
      node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES

      ]
      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer



























        7












        7








        7







        How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline key in an ordinary equation (and contour for the Sigma). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep and inner ysep. And overlay is used to avoid that the FEATURES node above U does not introduce additional horizontal space.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagecontour
        contourlength1pt
        usepackagetikz
        begindocument
        [ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
        node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
        ([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
        tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
        node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
        draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
        ~times~
        tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
        node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
        picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
        (path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;

        ~times~
        tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
        node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES

        ]
        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer















        How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline key in an ordinary equation (and contour for the Sigma). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep and inner ysep. And overlay is used to avoid that the FEATURES node above U does not introduce additional horizontal space.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagecontour
        contourlength1pt
        usepackagetikz
        begindocument
        [ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
        node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
        ([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
        tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
        node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
        draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
        ~times~
        tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
        node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
        picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
        (path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;

        ~times~
        tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
        node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES

        ]
        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 12 at 21:39

























        answered May 12 at 21:31









        marmotmarmot

        127k6162308




        127k6162308



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?