Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangleLabeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix
Gambler's Fallacy Dice
Does the US Supreme Court vote using secret ballots?
Is it possible to determine from only a photo of a cityscape whether it was taken close with wide angle or from a distance with zoom?
Can a generation ship withstand its own oxygen and daily wear for many thousands of years?
Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin
How would fantasy dwarves exist, realistically?
How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?
Referring to a character in 3rd person when they have amnesia
Pedaling at different gear ratios on flat terrain: what's the point?
Prints each letter of a string in different colors. C#
Cycling to work - 30mile return
Show that the characteristic polynomial is the same as the minimal polynomial
How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?
Quotient of Three Dimensional Torus by Permutation on Coordinates
Why does a table with a defined constant in its index compute 10X slower?
multicol package causes underfull hbox
Why is the S-duct intake on the Tu-154 uniquely oblong?
Alternative classical explanation of the Stern-Gerlach Experiment?
How does this piece of code determine array size without using sizeof( )?
What should I wear to go and sign an employment contract?
Would a "ring language" be possible?
What's is the easiest way to purchase a stock and hold it
What technology would Dwarves need to forge titanium?
Told to apply for UK visa before other visas, on UK-Spain-etc. visit
Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangle
Labeling rectangle above rectangleDrawing a 3x2 rectangleDrawing and labeling asymptotesRectangle between midpoints of rotated rectanglesDrawing rectangle with tikzpictureTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionRelative transparency in TikZ?Drawing a rectangle around text inside lstlistingWrong rectangle drawingMatrices and TikZ : arrows inside the matrix
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
add a comment |
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23
add a comment |
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
I came across this picture and I would like to know if you could give me a hand with it. I know how to draw the rectangles but, when it comes to the labeling thing, I am a total mess. Not to mention the sigma in the diagonal in the middle matrix.
So far, I've tried this:
documentclass[border=0.1cm]standalone
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackagetikz
usepackageamsfonts
usepackageamsmath,amssymb
usepackagesysteme,mathtools
usetikzlibrarypositioning,arrows.meta,quotes
usetikzlibraryshapes,snakes
usetikzlibrarybayesnet
tikzset>=latex
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw (-1.8,0.6) node colorblueMF explained:;
draw [very thick] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (0,0) rectangle (3.6/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (0.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,0.4/2) rectangle (2.8/2,0.8/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (1.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.0/2,1.6/2) rectangle (2.4/2,2.0/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (0.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (0.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.4/2,2.0/2) rectangle (2.8/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=white] (2.8/2,1.2/2) rectangle (3.2/2,2.0/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (0,0) grid (3.6/2,2.4/2);
draw (1.8/2,-0.3) node colorredscriptsize$YinmathbbR^mtimes f$;
draw (4.4/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$approx$;
draw [very thick] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (5.2/2,0) rectangle (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (5.2/2,0) grid (6.0/2,2.4/2);
draw (5.6/2,-0.3) node colorblackscriptsize$WinmathbbR^mtimes r$;
draw (6.8/2,1.2/2) node colorblacklarge$times$;
draw [very thick] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
filldraw [fill=green!20!white,draw=green!40!black] (7.6/2,0.8/2) rectangle (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw [step=0.4/2, very thin, color=gray] (7.6/2,0.8/2) grid (11.2/2,1.6/2);
draw (9.4/2,0) node colorredscriptsize$X^TinmathbbR^rtimes f$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
edited May 12 at 21:29
naveganteX
asked May 12 at 21:04
naveganteXnaveganteX
1386
1386
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23
add a comment |
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
1
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
add a comment |
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
add a comment |
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
How about the following? It uses only TikZ along with the baseline
key in an ordinary equation (and contour
for the Sigma
). The dimensions of these blocks are controlled by inner xsep
and inner ysep
. And overlay
is used to avoid that the FEATURES
node above U
does not introduce additional horizontal space.
documentclassarticle
usepackagecontour
contourlength1pt
usepackagetikz
begindocument
[ tikz[baseline=(X.base)] ([yshift=0.4ex]X.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,above]ITEMS
([xshift=-0.4ex]X.south west) -- ++ (-1ex,0) ~=~
tikz[baseline=(U.base)]
node[draw=yellow!80!black,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=2em,outer sep=0pt] (U)$mathsfU$;
draw([yshift=0.4ex]U.north west) -- ++ (0,1ex) -
~times~
tikz[baseline=(S.base)]
node[draw=blue!80,inner xsep=0.5em,inner ysep=0.5em,font=sffamilysmall,path
picture=draw (path picture bounding box.north west) --
(path picture bounding box.south east);,outer sep=0pt] (S)contourwhite$Sigma$;
~times~
tikz[baseline=(V.base)]- ([xshift=0.4ex]V.north east)
node[pos=0.25,font=sffamilysmall,right]FEATURES
]
enddocument
edited May 12 at 21:39
answered May 12 at 21:31
marmotmarmot
127k6162308
127k6162308
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490532%2flabeling-matrices-rectangles-and-drawing-sigma-inside-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
please show us, what you try so far. writing code from scratch is not fun ... so far your question is "do-for-me" type and probably will be closed as such. for labels i around rectangle you can use new nodes.
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:12
please extend your code sniped to compilable document. from it follow, that you not need symbolic image of equation but equation with real matrices?
– Zarko
May 12 at 21:23
1
@Zarko Thanks for your feedback! I have posted what I have done so far.
– naveganteX
May 12 at 21:23