Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?Can a Pact of the Blade warlock proficiently use weapons given by race?Use Magic Weapon Spell to Make a Warlock Pact Weapon?Are the Hex Warrior weapon & Pact of Blade weapon the same or different?Stacking Improved, Superior, and Ultimate Pact Blade WeaponDoes a Hexblade warlock get Hex Warrior's Cha bonus with a versatile weapon without Pact of the Blade?Is there a way to make the Shadow Blade spell into a warlock pact weapon?As a level 4 halfling hexblade pact of the blade warlock, what are my options for high damage per round?Do the Pact of the Blade warlock's Eldritch Smite and Lifedrinker eldritch invocations work with ranged pact weapons?As a Hexblade Pact of the Blade warlock, if I use my pact weapon bow as an improvised melee weapon, which benefits carry over?Can a multiclassed 2019 UA artificer/Pact of the Blade warlock use Thirsting Blade and Arcane Armament to make 3 attacks per Attack action?

Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?

Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?

Negative Resistance

Multiple options vs single option UI

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Which big number is bigger?

Help with my training data

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

How do I produce this symbol: Ϟ in pdfLaTeX?

Combinatorics problem, right solution?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Co-worker works way more than he should

Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?



Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?


Can a Pact of the Blade warlock proficiently use weapons given by race?Use Magic Weapon Spell to Make a Warlock Pact Weapon?Are the Hex Warrior weapon & Pact of Blade weapon the same or different?Stacking Improved, Superior, and Ultimate Pact Blade WeaponDoes a Hexblade warlock get Hex Warrior's Cha bonus with a versatile weapon without Pact of the Blade?Is there a way to make the Shadow Blade spell into a warlock pact weapon?As a level 4 halfling hexblade pact of the blade warlock, what are my options for high damage per round?Do the Pact of the Blade warlock's Eldritch Smite and Lifedrinker eldritch invocations work with ranged pact weapons?As a Hexblade Pact of the Blade warlock, if I use my pact weapon bow as an improvised melee weapon, which benefits carry over?Can a multiclassed 2019 UA artificer/Pact of the Blade warlock use Thirsting Blade and Arcane Armament to make 3 attacks per Attack action?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11












$begingroup$


I am making a Pact of the Blade warlock/Assassin rogue. I have the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation, so I can make a longbow pact weapon while at range and a melee pact weapon when not.



When I create a pact weapon, can I give it different weapon properties? Or do they stay the same as those listed in the Weapons table?



For example, a regular battleaxe is 1d8 and versatile (1d10). Could I make a battle axe with finesse?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    Apr 22 at 18:16










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
    $endgroup$
    – Louis Wasserman
    Apr 22 at 20:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 22 at 20:28

















11












$begingroup$


I am making a Pact of the Blade warlock/Assassin rogue. I have the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation, so I can make a longbow pact weapon while at range and a melee pact weapon when not.



When I create a pact weapon, can I give it different weapon properties? Or do they stay the same as those listed in the Weapons table?



For example, a regular battleaxe is 1d8 and versatile (1d10). Could I make a battle axe with finesse?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    Apr 22 at 18:16










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
    $endgroup$
    – Louis Wasserman
    Apr 22 at 20:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 22 at 20:28













11












11








11


1



$begingroup$


I am making a Pact of the Blade warlock/Assassin rogue. I have the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation, so I can make a longbow pact weapon while at range and a melee pact weapon when not.



When I create a pact weapon, can I give it different weapon properties? Or do they stay the same as those listed in the Weapons table?



For example, a regular battleaxe is 1d8 and versatile (1d10). Could I make a battle axe with finesse?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am making a Pact of the Blade warlock/Assassin rogue. I have the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation, so I can make a longbow pact weapon while at range and a melee pact weapon when not.



When I create a pact weapon, can I give it different weapon properties? Or do they stay the same as those listed in the Weapons table?



For example, a regular battleaxe is 1d8 and versatile (1d10). Could I make a battle axe with finesse?







dnd-5e class-feature weapons warlock






share|improve this question









New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 22 at 19:25









V2Blast

27.8k598169




27.8k598169






New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 22 at 18:13









Timothy AloiTimothy Aloi

613




613




New contributor




Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Timothy Aloi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    Apr 22 at 18:16










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
    $endgroup$
    – Louis Wasserman
    Apr 22 at 20:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 22 at 20:28












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    Apr 22 at 18:16










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
    $endgroup$
    – Louis Wasserman
    Apr 22 at 20:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 22 at 20:28







1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Apr 22 at 18:16




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Apr 22 at 18:16












$begingroup$
@NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
$endgroup$
– Louis Wasserman
Apr 22 at 20:26





$begingroup$
@NautArch I'm not entirely clear on what constitutes an answer and what doesn't on RPG.SE. The existing answers to this question are clearly correct and cite rules to that effect, and I don't believe I can improve on that. I have some elaborations as to why, at a meta level, they should be correct, but I wouldn't expect that to be the same thing as answering the question myself. Would adding a new answer really be appropriate in that scenario?
$endgroup$
– Louis Wasserman
Apr 22 at 20:26





1




1




$begingroup$
@LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 22 at 20:28




$begingroup$
@LouisWasserman No worries! Here is a meta about when you should comment vs answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 22 at 20:28










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

The properties will be the same as the normal weapon




You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). (PHB 107)




Note that the ability explicitly tells you where you look for your options. If the weapon you want isn't listed in chapter 5, you can't choose it. A battleaxe with finesse is a different weapon from the battleaxe listed in chapter 5 and thus is not an available option.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$

    Pact of the Blade does not give the ability to mix-and-match weapon features




    You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.



    Pact Blade, Player's Handbook, pg. 107




    The fact that the paragraph explicitly references chapter 5 as a reference for weapon options is pretty clear synecdoche for how this feature is meant to behave: you are meant to choose one of the weapons in that chapter to determine what your pact weapon looks like and has the stats for.



    Creating custom weapons (i.e. a Battleaxe with the Finesse property) is instead in the purview of the DM, and up to their discretion. If your DM decides they want to issue such a weapon, they're certainly free to do so, and if they then go on to decide that they want to allow a Pact of the Blade warlock to summon their Pact weapon in the form of this weapon, they would have to house rule the normal rules for Pact of the Blade, as neither of these things are the Rules as Written for the Pact of the Blade feature.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      5












      $begingroup$

      Pact of the Blade only lets you choose from the PHB weapon options, and that's important for balance reasons.



      The only guidance the pact blade feature gives "(see chapter 5 for weapon options)." This strongly suggests that the weapon options are precisely the ones in chapter 5, which don't let you mix and match. If that rule was intended to give you more options, it would specifically say so.



      Separately, however, the weapon choices from chapter 5, and the features associated with each weapon, are an important part of how the game is balanced in the first place. Weapons that do higher damage tend to have properties that impose limitations, such as the heavy or two-handed properties. The properties light, versatile, finesse, and thrown are all "good" properties, and if a particular character design can load them onto the heaviest-damaging weapons, that's game-breaking in a couple ways -- it means that everyone "should" take that character design, and it removes the advantages from taking other character builds. As designed, part of the reason a character would lean into Strength in the first place is to be able to benefit from the heaviest, most damaging weapons, and it's important to preserve that aspect to reward players that lean into that aspect of their character.



      (All of this is completely separate from the "realism" aspect -- that using a battleaxe doesn't seem likely to involve finesse in the dictionary sense, which Google suggests is "intricate and refined delicacy.")






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
        $endgroup$
        – Rubiksmoose
        Apr 22 at 20:53







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
        $endgroup$
        – Louis Wasserman
        Apr 22 at 20:59







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
        $endgroup$
        – Rubiksmoose
        Apr 22 at 21:03












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Timothy Aloi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145648%2fdoes-the-pact-of-the-blade-warlock-feature-allow-me-to-customize-the-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      16












      $begingroup$

      The properties will be the same as the normal weapon




      You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). (PHB 107)




      Note that the ability explicitly tells you where you look for your options. If the weapon you want isn't listed in chapter 5, you can't choose it. A battleaxe with finesse is a different weapon from the battleaxe listed in chapter 5 and thus is not an available option.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        16












        $begingroup$

        The properties will be the same as the normal weapon




        You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). (PHB 107)




        Note that the ability explicitly tells you where you look for your options. If the weapon you want isn't listed in chapter 5, you can't choose it. A battleaxe with finesse is a different weapon from the battleaxe listed in chapter 5 and thus is not an available option.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          16












          16








          16





          $begingroup$

          The properties will be the same as the normal weapon




          You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). (PHB 107)




          Note that the ability explicitly tells you where you look for your options. If the weapon you want isn't listed in chapter 5, you can't choose it. A battleaxe with finesse is a different weapon from the battleaxe listed in chapter 5 and thus is not an available option.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The properties will be the same as the normal weapon




          You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). (PHB 107)




          Note that the ability explicitly tells you where you look for your options. If the weapon you want isn't listed in chapter 5, you can't choose it. A battleaxe with finesse is a different weapon from the battleaxe listed in chapter 5 and thus is not an available option.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 22 at 18:18









          RubiksmooseRubiksmoose

          62.9k10305462




          62.9k10305462























              8












              $begingroup$

              Pact of the Blade does not give the ability to mix-and-match weapon features




              You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.



              Pact Blade, Player's Handbook, pg. 107




              The fact that the paragraph explicitly references chapter 5 as a reference for weapon options is pretty clear synecdoche for how this feature is meant to behave: you are meant to choose one of the weapons in that chapter to determine what your pact weapon looks like and has the stats for.



              Creating custom weapons (i.e. a Battleaxe with the Finesse property) is instead in the purview of the DM, and up to their discretion. If your DM decides they want to issue such a weapon, they're certainly free to do so, and if they then go on to decide that they want to allow a Pact of the Blade warlock to summon their Pact weapon in the form of this weapon, they would have to house rule the normal rules for Pact of the Blade, as neither of these things are the Rules as Written for the Pact of the Blade feature.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                8












                $begingroup$

                Pact of the Blade does not give the ability to mix-and-match weapon features




                You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.



                Pact Blade, Player's Handbook, pg. 107




                The fact that the paragraph explicitly references chapter 5 as a reference for weapon options is pretty clear synecdoche for how this feature is meant to behave: you are meant to choose one of the weapons in that chapter to determine what your pact weapon looks like and has the stats for.



                Creating custom weapons (i.e. a Battleaxe with the Finesse property) is instead in the purview of the DM, and up to their discretion. If your DM decides they want to issue such a weapon, they're certainly free to do so, and if they then go on to decide that they want to allow a Pact of the Blade warlock to summon their Pact weapon in the form of this weapon, they would have to house rule the normal rules for Pact of the Blade, as neither of these things are the Rules as Written for the Pact of the Blade feature.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  Pact of the Blade does not give the ability to mix-and-match weapon features




                  You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.



                  Pact Blade, Player's Handbook, pg. 107




                  The fact that the paragraph explicitly references chapter 5 as a reference for weapon options is pretty clear synecdoche for how this feature is meant to behave: you are meant to choose one of the weapons in that chapter to determine what your pact weapon looks like and has the stats for.



                  Creating custom weapons (i.e. a Battleaxe with the Finesse property) is instead in the purview of the DM, and up to their discretion. If your DM decides they want to issue such a weapon, they're certainly free to do so, and if they then go on to decide that they want to allow a Pact of the Blade warlock to summon their Pact weapon in the form of this weapon, they would have to house rule the normal rules for Pact of the Blade, as neither of these things are the Rules as Written for the Pact of the Blade feature.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Pact of the Blade does not give the ability to mix-and-match weapon features




                  You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.



                  Pact Blade, Player's Handbook, pg. 107




                  The fact that the paragraph explicitly references chapter 5 as a reference for weapon options is pretty clear synecdoche for how this feature is meant to behave: you are meant to choose one of the weapons in that chapter to determine what your pact weapon looks like and has the stats for.



                  Creating custom weapons (i.e. a Battleaxe with the Finesse property) is instead in the purview of the DM, and up to their discretion. If your DM decides they want to issue such a weapon, they're certainly free to do so, and if they then go on to decide that they want to allow a Pact of the Blade warlock to summon their Pact weapon in the form of this weapon, they would have to house rule the normal rules for Pact of the Blade, as neither of these things are the Rules as Written for the Pact of the Blade feature.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 22 at 19:26









                  V2Blast

                  27.8k598169




                  27.8k598169










                  answered Apr 22 at 18:20









                  XiremaXirema

                  25.1k371147




                  25.1k371147





















                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      Pact of the Blade only lets you choose from the PHB weapon options, and that's important for balance reasons.



                      The only guidance the pact blade feature gives "(see chapter 5 for weapon options)." This strongly suggests that the weapon options are precisely the ones in chapter 5, which don't let you mix and match. If that rule was intended to give you more options, it would specifically say so.



                      Separately, however, the weapon choices from chapter 5, and the features associated with each weapon, are an important part of how the game is balanced in the first place. Weapons that do higher damage tend to have properties that impose limitations, such as the heavy or two-handed properties. The properties light, versatile, finesse, and thrown are all "good" properties, and if a particular character design can load them onto the heaviest-damaging weapons, that's game-breaking in a couple ways -- it means that everyone "should" take that character design, and it removes the advantages from taking other character builds. As designed, part of the reason a character would lean into Strength in the first place is to be able to benefit from the heaviest, most damaging weapons, and it's important to preserve that aspect to reward players that lean into that aspect of their character.



                      (All of this is completely separate from the "realism" aspect -- that using a battleaxe doesn't seem likely to involve finesse in the dictionary sense, which Google suggests is "intricate and refined delicacy.")






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 20:53







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Louis Wasserman
                        Apr 22 at 20:59







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 21:03
















                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      Pact of the Blade only lets you choose from the PHB weapon options, and that's important for balance reasons.



                      The only guidance the pact blade feature gives "(see chapter 5 for weapon options)." This strongly suggests that the weapon options are precisely the ones in chapter 5, which don't let you mix and match. If that rule was intended to give you more options, it would specifically say so.



                      Separately, however, the weapon choices from chapter 5, and the features associated with each weapon, are an important part of how the game is balanced in the first place. Weapons that do higher damage tend to have properties that impose limitations, such as the heavy or two-handed properties. The properties light, versatile, finesse, and thrown are all "good" properties, and if a particular character design can load them onto the heaviest-damaging weapons, that's game-breaking in a couple ways -- it means that everyone "should" take that character design, and it removes the advantages from taking other character builds. As designed, part of the reason a character would lean into Strength in the first place is to be able to benefit from the heaviest, most damaging weapons, and it's important to preserve that aspect to reward players that lean into that aspect of their character.



                      (All of this is completely separate from the "realism" aspect -- that using a battleaxe doesn't seem likely to involve finesse in the dictionary sense, which Google suggests is "intricate and refined delicacy.")






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 20:53







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Louis Wasserman
                        Apr 22 at 20:59







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 21:03














                      5












                      5








                      5





                      $begingroup$

                      Pact of the Blade only lets you choose from the PHB weapon options, and that's important for balance reasons.



                      The only guidance the pact blade feature gives "(see chapter 5 for weapon options)." This strongly suggests that the weapon options are precisely the ones in chapter 5, which don't let you mix and match. If that rule was intended to give you more options, it would specifically say so.



                      Separately, however, the weapon choices from chapter 5, and the features associated with each weapon, are an important part of how the game is balanced in the first place. Weapons that do higher damage tend to have properties that impose limitations, such as the heavy or two-handed properties. The properties light, versatile, finesse, and thrown are all "good" properties, and if a particular character design can load them onto the heaviest-damaging weapons, that's game-breaking in a couple ways -- it means that everyone "should" take that character design, and it removes the advantages from taking other character builds. As designed, part of the reason a character would lean into Strength in the first place is to be able to benefit from the heaviest, most damaging weapons, and it's important to preserve that aspect to reward players that lean into that aspect of their character.



                      (All of this is completely separate from the "realism" aspect -- that using a battleaxe doesn't seem likely to involve finesse in the dictionary sense, which Google suggests is "intricate and refined delicacy.")






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Pact of the Blade only lets you choose from the PHB weapon options, and that's important for balance reasons.



                      The only guidance the pact blade feature gives "(see chapter 5 for weapon options)." This strongly suggests that the weapon options are precisely the ones in chapter 5, which don't let you mix and match. If that rule was intended to give you more options, it would specifically say so.



                      Separately, however, the weapon choices from chapter 5, and the features associated with each weapon, are an important part of how the game is balanced in the first place. Weapons that do higher damage tend to have properties that impose limitations, such as the heavy or two-handed properties. The properties light, versatile, finesse, and thrown are all "good" properties, and if a particular character design can load them onto the heaviest-damaging weapons, that's game-breaking in a couple ways -- it means that everyone "should" take that character design, and it removes the advantages from taking other character builds. As designed, part of the reason a character would lean into Strength in the first place is to be able to benefit from the heaviest, most damaging weapons, and it's important to preserve that aspect to reward players that lean into that aspect of their character.



                      (All of this is completely separate from the "realism" aspect -- that using a battleaxe doesn't seem likely to involve finesse in the dictionary sense, which Google suggests is "intricate and refined delicacy.")







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 22 at 20:49









                      Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

                      65613




                      65613







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 20:53







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Louis Wasserman
                        Apr 22 at 20:59







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 21:03













                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 20:53







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Louis Wasserman
                        Apr 22 at 20:59







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Rubiksmoose
                        Apr 22 at 21:03








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      Apr 22 at 20:53





                      $begingroup$
                      To answer the question you posed in your comment above, generally, as long as a post attempts to answer the question it is a valid answer. You can optionally include answer-adjacent material in your answer (though generally we recommend keeping this to a minimum.). This seems very good! And it seems like it is adding enough unique points that it is worthwhile to have in addition to the other answers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      Apr 22 at 20:53





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Louis Wasserman
                      Apr 22 at 20:59





                      $begingroup$
                      @Rubiksmoose thanks for the explanation; I am very familiar with other StackExchange sites (150K rep on StackOverflow) but RPG.SE seems to have different conventions about answers versus comments, so I'm still getting a handle on it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Louis Wasserman
                      Apr 22 at 20:59





                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      Apr 22 at 21:03





                      $begingroup$
                      no worries! We definitely hew closer to Stack-wide guidance on comments than some of the other stacks (and especially, ironically, SO). I appreciate you working with us and I think your stuff is good. I've noticed a couple of your former comments have been turned into very successful answers! Anyways, we're happy to have you around and feel free to ping me (or anyone) in Role-playing Games Chat or post a meta if you are confused about anything specifically :-)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Rubiksmoose
                      Apr 22 at 21:03











                      Timothy Aloi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Timothy Aloi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Timothy Aloi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Timothy Aloi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145648%2fdoes-the-pact-of-the-blade-warlock-feature-allow-me-to-customize-the-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

                      Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

                      Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림