What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?What helicopter has the most rotor blades?Which helicopter can auto rotate the farthest?What aircraft is this?What are the differences between a helicopter engine (turboshaft) and an aircraft engine (turboprop)?Is quadcopter design scalable?What's the difference between feathering, and flapping in a helicopter?What helicopter is this in The Walking Dead?What is this helicopter (and probe) in the film “Act of Valor”?What type of helicopter is shown in Star Wars The Last Jedi featurette?What is the relationship between speed, torque and pitch in a helicopter?What is the name of this vintage helicopter trainer?What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
How do I produce this symbol: Ϟ in pdfLaTeX?
Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?
Find the identical rows in a matrix
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
How can I practically buy stocks?
What is purpose of DB Browser(dbbrowser.aspx) under admin tool?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Unknown code in script
Why is the underscore command _ useful?
Prove that the countable union of countable sets is also countable
Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?
Drawing a german abacus as in the books of Adam Ries
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
Combinatorics problem, right solution?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
Is there a word for the censored part of a video?
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?Which helicopter can auto rotate the farthest?What aircraft is this?What are the differences between a helicopter engine (turboshaft) and an aircraft engine (turboprop)?Is quadcopter design scalable?What's the difference between feathering, and flapping in a helicopter?What helicopter is this in The Walking Dead?What is this helicopter (and probe) in the film “Act of Valor”?What type of helicopter is shown in Star Wars The Last Jedi featurette?What is the relationship between speed, torque and pitch in a helicopter?What is the name of this vintage helicopter trainer?What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft. I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person? Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what? What if it ran on petroleum?
If not, then how is the separation between a VTOL aircraft and helicopter defined?
Would a Chinook that can fly itself be a drone?
helicopter aircraft-identification
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft. I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person? Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what? What if it ran on petroleum?
If not, then how is the separation between a VTOL aircraft and helicopter defined?
Would a Chinook that can fly itself be a drone?
helicopter aircraft-identification
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft. I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person? Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what? What if it ran on petroleum?
If not, then how is the separation between a VTOL aircraft and helicopter defined?
Would a Chinook that can fly itself be a drone?
helicopter aircraft-identification
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft. I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person? Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what? What if it ran on petroleum?
If not, then how is the separation between a VTOL aircraft and helicopter defined?
Would a Chinook that can fly itself be a drone?
helicopter aircraft-identification
helicopter aircraft-identification
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Muze
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
asked Apr 22 at 18:10
MuzeMuze
364311
364311
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
2
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
4
4
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
4
4
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A helicopter is an aircraft in which thrust and lift are provided by rotors.
A drone is an unmanned, self-piloted or remotely-controlled aircraft, which can use rotors to provide thrust and lift, but can also use other means such as propellers or turbines.
To put it in simpler terms, a helicopter can only be a helicopter, regardless of whether it has a human inside or not. A drone can be any kind of aircraft.
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I would just call it a VTOL aircraft. Those kind of multi-rotor VTOLs do kind of blur the line between VTOL and helicopter, but a practical way to define them could be to separate them by a key capability; the ability to glide.
A helicopter has a rotary wing that is driven forward by a power source like an airplane, but can also change pitch and glide downhill, like an airplane. A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes joined at the wingtips being driven in a circle by a twisting force applied at the wing tip instead of a propeller out at mid span.
A multi-rotor VTOL with small fixed pitch rotors can't glide, which is why you won't get me in one unless it has multiple levels of redundancy with NO single-points-of-failure or double-points-of-failure modes for that matter (like say being able to take damage to both rotors on one corner for example, and still maintain control).
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no automatic separation between the two, it is possible for an aircraft to be both a drone and a helicopter. Drone only refers to how the vehicle is piloted, and helicopter only refers to how it flies. (Battery vs petroleum vs any other power source is a third, separate modifier, too.)
The vehicle in your picture is an unmanned aircraft, a drone, a helicopter, a quadcoptor, and a VTOL vehicle all at once.
(Note: Unmanned means not having any crew on board. You can still have passengers, they don't count.)
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft.
Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control (rather than controls directly affecting the control surfaces/rotors). Method of generating lift, engine technology and size are not a factor - after WW1 some biplanes became drones and various air forces have converting more modern end-of-life fighters to drones, either for attack or for target practice.
I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person?
Passenger carrying unmanned aerial vehicle or 'passenger drone'
Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what?
What. I'd call it a rotorcraft (UK terminology used, e.g. in CAA larger UAS guide), or more specifically a large octocopter.
I tend not to call things helicopters if they don't have helicopter controls (cyclic and collective driving a swashplate), but I can't find an authority on whether that is what makes a helicopter. Electric multi-rotor craft use differential rotor speed to manoeuvre instead.
What if it ran on petroleum?
I suspect it would fall out of the sky - it would be hard to get the control responsiveness from eight small petrol engines or one large one and an eight way variable transmission that would allow it to be stable. You could change it from an octocopter to an eight rotor helicopter by adding swashplates, but with the other changes to make that happen it would be a different thing.
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62605%2fwhat-is-the-definining-line-between-a-helicopter-and-a-drone-a-person-can-ride-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A helicopter is an aircraft in which thrust and lift are provided by rotors.
A drone is an unmanned, self-piloted or remotely-controlled aircraft, which can use rotors to provide thrust and lift, but can also use other means such as propellers or turbines.
To put it in simpler terms, a helicopter can only be a helicopter, regardless of whether it has a human inside or not. A drone can be any kind of aircraft.
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
A helicopter is an aircraft in which thrust and lift are provided by rotors.
A drone is an unmanned, self-piloted or remotely-controlled aircraft, which can use rotors to provide thrust and lift, but can also use other means such as propellers or turbines.
To put it in simpler terms, a helicopter can only be a helicopter, regardless of whether it has a human inside or not. A drone can be any kind of aircraft.
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
A helicopter is an aircraft in which thrust and lift are provided by rotors.
A drone is an unmanned, self-piloted or remotely-controlled aircraft, which can use rotors to provide thrust and lift, but can also use other means such as propellers or turbines.
To put it in simpler terms, a helicopter can only be a helicopter, regardless of whether it has a human inside or not. A drone can be any kind of aircraft.
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
$endgroup$
A helicopter is an aircraft in which thrust and lift are provided by rotors.
A drone is an unmanned, self-piloted or remotely-controlled aircraft, which can use rotors to provide thrust and lift, but can also use other means such as propellers or turbines.
To put it in simpler terms, a helicopter can only be a helicopter, regardless of whether it has a human inside or not. A drone can be any kind of aircraft.
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
edited Apr 22 at 19:54
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
answered Apr 22 at 19:04
Juan JimenezJuan Jimenez
3,545528
3,545528
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
|
show 2 more comments
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
10
10
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
$begingroup$
I know some people like to clarify it even further and insist that a "drone" is a self-piloting unmanned craft, rather than one remote-controlled by a human on the ground. There are people (mostly military) who get really offended when you refer to a human-controlled unmanned craft as a "drone". (Much like the infamous boat vs. ship debate - do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people...)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 22 at 19:21
2
2
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
$begingroup$
A drone with a ground operator pretty much flies itself. The operator is there mostly to command changes to mission profile and make the kinds of life and death decisions the computer can't make (and even that will eventually be done away with with the use of machine learning). If I am not mistaken, all the autonomous and ground-operated drones have the capability to fly home on their own, either when commanded or if they lose contact with home base.
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:43
15
15
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
$begingroup$
"do NOT get that wrong in front of Navy people..." It depends on the Navy people you are in front of. I was a Naval Aviator and we called everything that floated a boat! :) Surface types don't share the same sense of humor though.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
5
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
$begingroup$
A drone is generally useless unless it flies some sort of payload. Just because the payload is a sack of water and meat doesn't mean it's not a drone. :)
$endgroup$
– Juan Jimenez
Apr 22 at 19:45
5
5
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
$begingroup$
@MichaelHall I'm surprised you didn't just lump them all into 'targets' to really annoy the surface sailors.
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Apr 22 at 20:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I would just call it a VTOL aircraft. Those kind of multi-rotor VTOLs do kind of blur the line between VTOL and helicopter, but a practical way to define them could be to separate them by a key capability; the ability to glide.
A helicopter has a rotary wing that is driven forward by a power source like an airplane, but can also change pitch and glide downhill, like an airplane. A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes joined at the wingtips being driven in a circle by a twisting force applied at the wing tip instead of a propeller out at mid span.
A multi-rotor VTOL with small fixed pitch rotors can't glide, which is why you won't get me in one unless it has multiple levels of redundancy with NO single-points-of-failure or double-points-of-failure modes for that matter (like say being able to take damage to both rotors on one corner for example, and still maintain control).
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would just call it a VTOL aircraft. Those kind of multi-rotor VTOLs do kind of blur the line between VTOL and helicopter, but a practical way to define them could be to separate them by a key capability; the ability to glide.
A helicopter has a rotary wing that is driven forward by a power source like an airplane, but can also change pitch and glide downhill, like an airplane. A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes joined at the wingtips being driven in a circle by a twisting force applied at the wing tip instead of a propeller out at mid span.
A multi-rotor VTOL with small fixed pitch rotors can't glide, which is why you won't get me in one unless it has multiple levels of redundancy with NO single-points-of-failure or double-points-of-failure modes for that matter (like say being able to take damage to both rotors on one corner for example, and still maintain control).
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would just call it a VTOL aircraft. Those kind of multi-rotor VTOLs do kind of blur the line between VTOL and helicopter, but a practical way to define them could be to separate them by a key capability; the ability to glide.
A helicopter has a rotary wing that is driven forward by a power source like an airplane, but can also change pitch and glide downhill, like an airplane. A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes joined at the wingtips being driven in a circle by a twisting force applied at the wing tip instead of a propeller out at mid span.
A multi-rotor VTOL with small fixed pitch rotors can't glide, which is why you won't get me in one unless it has multiple levels of redundancy with NO single-points-of-failure or double-points-of-failure modes for that matter (like say being able to take damage to both rotors on one corner for example, and still maintain control).
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
$endgroup$
I would just call it a VTOL aircraft. Those kind of multi-rotor VTOLs do kind of blur the line between VTOL and helicopter, but a practical way to define them could be to separate them by a key capability; the ability to glide.
A helicopter has a rotary wing that is driven forward by a power source like an airplane, but can also change pitch and glide downhill, like an airplane. A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes joined at the wingtips being driven in a circle by a twisting force applied at the wing tip instead of a propeller out at mid span.
A multi-rotor VTOL with small fixed pitch rotors can't glide, which is why you won't get me in one unless it has multiple levels of redundancy with NO single-points-of-failure or double-points-of-failure modes for that matter (like say being able to take damage to both rotors on one corner for example, and still maintain control).
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
answered Apr 22 at 19:47
John KJohn K
26.7k14182
26.7k14182
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"A rotor is just two fuselage-less airplanes" It can be more than two.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Apr 22 at 20:21
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"fuselage-less airplanes" ... so wings?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... as in "rotary wing" aircraft.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Theoretically that design could operate with one corner out. First all the sets are counter-rotating, so there's no torque issue. And it's hybrid electric, so it is just a controls problem to provide reverse thrust from the opposite corner if needed for balance. However they seem to have hedged their bets with a whole aircraft ballistic parachute.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I've heard that too. Ballistic parachutes are no good below a certain height, so you still end up with a critical risk zone. I have no doubt however that at some point they will be considered to be safe people movers.
$endgroup$
– John K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no automatic separation between the two, it is possible for an aircraft to be both a drone and a helicopter. Drone only refers to how the vehicle is piloted, and helicopter only refers to how it flies. (Battery vs petroleum vs any other power source is a third, separate modifier, too.)
The vehicle in your picture is an unmanned aircraft, a drone, a helicopter, a quadcoptor, and a VTOL vehicle all at once.
(Note: Unmanned means not having any crew on board. You can still have passengers, they don't count.)
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no automatic separation between the two, it is possible for an aircraft to be both a drone and a helicopter. Drone only refers to how the vehicle is piloted, and helicopter only refers to how it flies. (Battery vs petroleum vs any other power source is a third, separate modifier, too.)
The vehicle in your picture is an unmanned aircraft, a drone, a helicopter, a quadcoptor, and a VTOL vehicle all at once.
(Note: Unmanned means not having any crew on board. You can still have passengers, they don't count.)
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no automatic separation between the two, it is possible for an aircraft to be both a drone and a helicopter. Drone only refers to how the vehicle is piloted, and helicopter only refers to how it flies. (Battery vs petroleum vs any other power source is a third, separate modifier, too.)
The vehicle in your picture is an unmanned aircraft, a drone, a helicopter, a quadcoptor, and a VTOL vehicle all at once.
(Note: Unmanned means not having any crew on board. You can still have passengers, they don't count.)
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
$endgroup$
There is no automatic separation between the two, it is possible for an aircraft to be both a drone and a helicopter. Drone only refers to how the vehicle is piloted, and helicopter only refers to how it flies. (Battery vs petroleum vs any other power source is a third, separate modifier, too.)
The vehicle in your picture is an unmanned aircraft, a drone, a helicopter, a quadcoptor, and a VTOL vehicle all at once.
(Note: Unmanned means not having any crew on board. You can still have passengers, they don't count.)
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
answered Apr 22 at 21:36
user3067860user3067860
1812
1812
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
It does raise the interesting question where the distinction between a "passenger" selecting a destination on a map and a "pilot" putting a waypoint into a full autopilot is. Ability to take manual control is of course a training and likely regulatory difference. But that will never be flown without some computer assistance, such as a rate-damping loop managing the throttles (ie, what RC quad people call "acro mode")
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
$begingroup$
It is also an R/C aircraft...
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft.
Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control (rather than controls directly affecting the control surfaces/rotors). Method of generating lift, engine technology and size are not a factor - after WW1 some biplanes became drones and various air forces have converting more modern end-of-life fighters to drones, either for attack or for target practice.
I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person?
Passenger carrying unmanned aerial vehicle or 'passenger drone'
Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what?
What. I'd call it a rotorcraft (UK terminology used, e.g. in CAA larger UAS guide), or more specifically a large octocopter.
I tend not to call things helicopters if they don't have helicopter controls (cyclic and collective driving a swashplate), but I can't find an authority on whether that is what makes a helicopter. Electric multi-rotor craft use differential rotor speed to manoeuvre instead.
What if it ran on petroleum?
I suspect it would fall out of the sky - it would be hard to get the control responsiveness from eight small petrol engines or one large one and an eight way variable transmission that would allow it to be stable. You could change it from an octocopter to an eight rotor helicopter by adding swashplates, but with the other changes to make that happen it would be a different thing.
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft.
Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control (rather than controls directly affecting the control surfaces/rotors). Method of generating lift, engine technology and size are not a factor - after WW1 some biplanes became drones and various air forces have converting more modern end-of-life fighters to drones, either for attack or for target practice.
I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person?
Passenger carrying unmanned aerial vehicle or 'passenger drone'
Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what?
What. I'd call it a rotorcraft (UK terminology used, e.g. in CAA larger UAS guide), or more specifically a large octocopter.
I tend not to call things helicopters if they don't have helicopter controls (cyclic and collective driving a swashplate), but I can't find an authority on whether that is what makes a helicopter. Electric multi-rotor craft use differential rotor speed to manoeuvre instead.
What if it ran on petroleum?
I suspect it would fall out of the sky - it would be hard to get the control responsiveness from eight small petrol engines or one large one and an eight way variable transmission that would allow it to be stable. You could change it from an octocopter to an eight rotor helicopter by adding swashplates, but with the other changes to make that happen it would be a different thing.
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft.
Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control (rather than controls directly affecting the control surfaces/rotors). Method of generating lift, engine technology and size are not a factor - after WW1 some biplanes became drones and various air forces have converting more modern end-of-life fighters to drones, either for attack or for target practice.
I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person?
Passenger carrying unmanned aerial vehicle or 'passenger drone'
Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what?
What. I'd call it a rotorcraft (UK terminology used, e.g. in CAA larger UAS guide), or more specifically a large octocopter.
I tend not to call things helicopters if they don't have helicopter controls (cyclic and collective driving a swashplate), but I can't find an authority on whether that is what makes a helicopter. Electric multi-rotor craft use differential rotor speed to manoeuvre instead.
What if it ran on petroleum?
I suspect it would fall out of the sky - it would be hard to get the control responsiveness from eight small petrol engines or one large one and an eight way variable transmission that would allow it to be stable. You could change it from an octocopter to an eight rotor helicopter by adding swashplates, but with the other changes to make that happen it would be a different thing.
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
$endgroup$
When I say drone in this context I don't mean an unmanned aircraft.
Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control (rather than controls directly affecting the control surfaces/rotors). Method of generating lift, engine technology and size are not a factor - after WW1 some biplanes became drones and various air forces have converting more modern end-of-life fighters to drones, either for attack or for target practice.
I'm not sure what the terminology of a drone that has been adapted to carry a person?
Passenger carrying unmanned aerial vehicle or 'passenger drone'
Is this picture below considered a helicopter or what?
What. I'd call it a rotorcraft (UK terminology used, e.g. in CAA larger UAS guide), or more specifically a large octocopter.
I tend not to call things helicopters if they don't have helicopter controls (cyclic and collective driving a swashplate), but I can't find an authority on whether that is what makes a helicopter. Electric multi-rotor craft use differential rotor speed to manoeuvre instead.
What if it ran on petroleum?
I suspect it would fall out of the sky - it would be hard to get the control responsiveness from eight small petrol engines or one large one and an eight way variable transmission that would allow it to be stable. You could change it from an octocopter to an eight rotor helicopter by adding swashplates, but with the other changes to make that happen it would be a different thing.
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
20915
20915
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"Drones are unmanned aircraft which can receive flight path control" False. As demonstrated by your own link, the terminology originated before such capability even existed, specifically at the point where they were turning full scale piloted aircraft into a larger version of later hobby RC planes
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton yes, historically 'drone' was applied before automated wayfinding. Also 'computer' used to be the word for a human who did arithmetic, but if I someone asked me what a computer is I wouldn't give that as the definition.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The meaning of "drone" has not changed, it is still fully inclusive of the type of remote piloted operation you are trying to exclude.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@ChrisStratton in my own lifetime it has gone from being exclusively military fixed wing to include quadcopters and the like. The distinction between a small drone and a RC plane is the wayfinding. The larger modern drones also all have wayfinding.
$endgroup$
– Pete Kirkham
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The majority of quadcopters are remotely piloted. Only higher end systems have mission-level autopilot that follows GPS waypoints or terrain match cameras. But all of the above are within the meaning of "drone" - making your attempt to exclude the remotely piloted aircraft which coined the term, and those that still work that way, silly.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
2 days ago
add a comment |
Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62605%2fwhat-is-the-definining-line-between-a-helicopter-and-a-drone-a-person-can-ride-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If it can fly itself it is an AAV, drones are dumb by definition.
$endgroup$
– mckenzm
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
I think the word you're looking for is "quadcopter". The aircraft in the picture you posted is a quadcopter. That aircraft has nothing to do with drones whatsoever, aside from the fact that it's a quadcopter, and many drones are quadcopters.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
@slebetman, No, it's an octacopter or a contra-rotating quadcopter. Look at the shadows.
$endgroup$
– Spook
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Spook Shadows aside, it would seem to be weirdly balanced if at all with only three arms.
$endgroup$
– Michael
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze - Very good question! I hope this one and this one are enough to get you out of question ban jail. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– Steve V.
4 hours ago