Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?Raster data with no values (ArcGIS)Multiple attribute symbology in ArcMapTrim symbology label decimal places when using Arcade in ArcGIS Pro?Assign Values to Breaks in Graduated Colors Symbology - ArcGIS ProWriting If-Then statement in ArcGIS Pro field calculator using Python?Passing attributes from join features to target features in 'SpatialJoin_analysis'?Simple Field Calculation With No Results in ArcGIS Pro?Collecting Moran's I output values in ArcGIS Pro?Selecting max values using Dissolve + keeping other fields?Creating IDW-rasters from each field in large point feature set using ArcPy for ArcGIS Pro?

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?

How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?

Crossed out red box fitting tightly around image

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

How important is it that $TERM is correct?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

How to have a sharp product image?

Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies

Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?

How can I practically buy stocks?

Find the identical rows in a matrix

Why doesn't the standard consider a template constructor as a copy constructor?

Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Von Neumann Extractor - Which bit is retained?

Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?

Why is the underscore command _ useful?

A ​Note ​on ​N!

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?



Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?


Raster data with no values (ArcGIS)Multiple attribute symbology in ArcMapTrim symbology label decimal places when using Arcade in ArcGIS Pro?Assign Values to Breaks in Graduated Colors Symbology - ArcGIS ProWriting If-Then statement in ArcGIS Pro field calculator using Python?Passing attributes from join features to target features in 'SpatialJoin_analysis'?Simple Field Calculation With No Results in ArcGIS Pro?Collecting Moran's I output values in ArcGIS Pro?Selecting max values using Dissolve + keeping other fields?Creating IDW-rasters from each field in large point feature set using ArcPy for ArcGIS Pro?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.



I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.



However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.



I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.



How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?



UPDATE: I tried a few more things:



  • Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
    into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
    graduated symbology.


  • Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated

    symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used

    them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.


So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."










share|improve this question
























  • Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 16:39











  • @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

    – auslander
    Apr 22 at 17:10

















3















This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.



I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.



However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.



I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.



How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?



UPDATE: I tried a few more things:



  • Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
    into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
    graduated symbology.


  • Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated

    symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used

    them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.


So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."










share|improve this question
























  • Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 16:39











  • @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

    – auslander
    Apr 22 at 17:10













3












3








3








This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.



I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.



However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.



I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.



How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?



UPDATE: I tried a few more things:



  • Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
    into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
    graduated symbology.


  • Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated

    symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used

    them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.


So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."










share|improve this question
















This may be an easy one but I am not a statistician so it's something I'd like an answer to.



I have a polygon feature class loaded in ArcGIS Pro that contains a field with values ranging from 1 to around 1200. I am attempting to use graduated color symbology to display the relative difference in values based on that field.



However, no matter what way I symbolize it (Quantile is what I'm after, but have tried others), it will not pick up 1200 as the max value. It lists 661 as the max value for the field, and then refuses to render values above that.



I have around 163,000 rows in the FC. Of that, approximately 200 rows fall above 661.



How do I get ArcGIS Pro to make the maximum value for graduated colors, the actual maximum value of the field?



UPDATE: I tried a few more things:



  • Creating a completely new feature class and loading it from scratch
    into ArcGIS Pro. Didn't matter, still cut off at 661 when doing any
    graduated symbology.


  • Loaded the same data into QGIS (3.4). Upon setting it to graduated

    symbology, it picked up the min/max values without issue and used

    them properly for each of the preset classification schemes.


So it seems that Pro is doing some sort of automatic range boundary setting for large datasets; perhaps in an attempt to be "helpful."







arcgis-desktop arcgis-pro






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 22 at 17:15







auslander

















asked Apr 22 at 16:00









auslanderauslander

514314




514314












  • Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 16:39











  • @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

    – auslander
    Apr 22 at 17:10

















  • Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 16:39











  • @lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

    – auslander
    Apr 22 at 17:10
















Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

– lambertj
Apr 22 at 16:39





Have you tried manual interval as the classification method and set your top bin as ≤ 1200? You can try Quantile to set the bins, then select manual interval, then change the upper bound of the top bin or do any other tweaking that is necessary.

– lambertj
Apr 22 at 16:39













@lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

– auslander
Apr 22 at 17:10





@lambertj Yes, I've tried that; however when I then set it back to Quantile or Natural Breaks, it drops back down to 661. I will add an update reflecting that when I load this same data into QGIS, it does not behave in this way. It picks up correct min-max values without issue.

– auslander
Apr 22 at 17:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.



ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.



If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.



The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.






share|improve this answer























  • Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 19:53











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f319517%2fwhy-is-arcgis-pro-not-symbolizing-my-entire-range-of-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.



ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.



If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.



The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.






share|improve this answer























  • Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 19:53















4














I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.



ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.



If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.



The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.






share|improve this answer























  • Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 19:53













4












4








4







I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.



ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.



If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.



The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.






share|improve this answer













I've been given an answer by Esri for this and list it here in case anyone ever stumbles across the same problem.



ArcGIS Pro takes a sample from the data in order to find its min-max values. This sample by default is set to 10000.



If a user changes that sample size through the overflow (hamburger) menu on the Symbology tab to a higher number, it will read the min-max values correctly. In my case I had to set the sample size to 163000 because so few rows out of the whole were higher than 661.



The reason it works in QGIS without this is apparently because QGIS does not use a sample size; it just calculates the min-max of the data from the entire data frame by default.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 22 at 18:35









auslanderauslander

514314




514314












  • Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 19:53

















  • Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

    – lambertj
    Apr 22 at 19:53
















Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

– lambertj
Apr 22 at 19:53





Very interesting. I wasn't aware that ArcGIS Pro is using a sample of the data to calculate min-max values for symbology.

– lambertj
Apr 22 at 19:53

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f319517%2fwhy-is-arcgis-pro-not-symbolizing-my-entire-range-of-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림