Oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibersVanishing of Euler classAre there analogous statements for the number of zeros of a section in terms of the Euler class, even when the relevant spaces are not manifolds? When does an even-dimensional manifold fiber over an odd-dimensional manifold?Computing a cobordism group of manifolds endowed with a real vector bundle with constraints on the Stiefel-Whitney classesHow to flow submanifolds?Analogue of the Euler class of a circle bundle and the global angular formIs every vector bundle over a noncompact finite-dimensional manifold a summand of a trivial bundle?Consequences of the Euler characteristic vanishing mod pVector bundle over an oriented manifold with non-vanishing w_2w_3Lifting sections of a projective bundle to a vector bundle

Oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibers


Vanishing of Euler classAre there analogous statements for the number of zeros of a section in terms of the Euler class, even when the relevant spaces are not manifolds? When does an even-dimensional manifold fiber over an odd-dimensional manifold?Computing a cobordism group of manifolds endowed with a real vector bundle with constraints on the Stiefel-Whitney classesHow to flow submanifolds?Analogue of the Euler class of a circle bundle and the global angular formIs every vector bundle over a noncompact finite-dimensional manifold a summand of a trivial bundle?Consequences of the Euler characteristic vanishing mod pVector bundle over an oriented manifold with non-vanishing w_2w_3Lifting sections of a projective bundle to a vector bundle













6












$begingroup$


Is it true that for every oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibers, there is always a global section that vanishes nowhere?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    6












    $begingroup$


    Is it true that for every oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibers, there is always a global section that vanishes nowhere?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      6












      6








      6


      1



      $begingroup$


      Is it true that for every oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibers, there is always a global section that vanishes nowhere?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Is it true that for every oriented vector bundle with odd-dimensional fibers, there is always a global section that vanishes nowhere?







      at.algebraic-topology differential-topology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 22 at 8:40









      user43326

      2,2558 silver badges21 bronze badges




      2,2558 silver badges21 bronze badges










      asked Jul 22 at 8:15









      FredyFredy

      483 bronze badges




      483 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15












          $begingroup$

          No.



          Let us consider some vector bundles over $S^4$. Since $S^4$ is simply connected all vector bundles are oriented and rank $k$ vector bundles over $S^4$ are classified by $pi_3(SO(k))$ by the clutching construction (I am glossing over basepoint issues here, but I think it is correct in this setting). Now $pi_3(SO(1))$ and $ pi_3(SO(2)=pi_3(S^1)$ are trivial groups, so there do not exist non-trivial rank $1$ and rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$. What about rank $3$? Well $SO(3)cong mathbb RP^3$ and the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fiber bundle
          $$
          mathbbZ_2rightarrow S^3rightarrow mathbbRP^3
          $$

          shows that $pi_3(SO(3))congpi_3(mathbbRP^3)cong mathbbZ$. Hence there are $mathbbZ$ different rank $3$ vector bundles over $S^4$.



          Only the trivial one admits a non-zero section. If another one admits a section, then the orthogonal complement (a rank $2$ bundle) must be non-trivial, otherwise the bundle is trivial. But our previous computation shows that there are no-nontrivial rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
            $endgroup$
            – BS.
            Jul 22 at 10:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 22 at 13:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Rot
            Jul 22 at 15:06










          • $begingroup$
            @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 23 at 2:40













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336716%2foriented-vector-bundle-with-odd-dimensional-fibers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          15












          $begingroup$

          No.



          Let us consider some vector bundles over $S^4$. Since $S^4$ is simply connected all vector bundles are oriented and rank $k$ vector bundles over $S^4$ are classified by $pi_3(SO(k))$ by the clutching construction (I am glossing over basepoint issues here, but I think it is correct in this setting). Now $pi_3(SO(1))$ and $ pi_3(SO(2)=pi_3(S^1)$ are trivial groups, so there do not exist non-trivial rank $1$ and rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$. What about rank $3$? Well $SO(3)cong mathbb RP^3$ and the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fiber bundle
          $$
          mathbbZ_2rightarrow S^3rightarrow mathbbRP^3
          $$

          shows that $pi_3(SO(3))congpi_3(mathbbRP^3)cong mathbbZ$. Hence there are $mathbbZ$ different rank $3$ vector bundles over $S^4$.



          Only the trivial one admits a non-zero section. If another one admits a section, then the orthogonal complement (a rank $2$ bundle) must be non-trivial, otherwise the bundle is trivial. But our previous computation shows that there are no-nontrivial rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
            $endgroup$
            – BS.
            Jul 22 at 10:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 22 at 13:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Rot
            Jul 22 at 15:06










          • $begingroup$
            @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 23 at 2:40















          15












          $begingroup$

          No.



          Let us consider some vector bundles over $S^4$. Since $S^4$ is simply connected all vector bundles are oriented and rank $k$ vector bundles over $S^4$ are classified by $pi_3(SO(k))$ by the clutching construction (I am glossing over basepoint issues here, but I think it is correct in this setting). Now $pi_3(SO(1))$ and $ pi_3(SO(2)=pi_3(S^1)$ are trivial groups, so there do not exist non-trivial rank $1$ and rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$. What about rank $3$? Well $SO(3)cong mathbb RP^3$ and the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fiber bundle
          $$
          mathbbZ_2rightarrow S^3rightarrow mathbbRP^3
          $$

          shows that $pi_3(SO(3))congpi_3(mathbbRP^3)cong mathbbZ$. Hence there are $mathbbZ$ different rank $3$ vector bundles over $S^4$.



          Only the trivial one admits a non-zero section. If another one admits a section, then the orthogonal complement (a rank $2$ bundle) must be non-trivial, otherwise the bundle is trivial. But our previous computation shows that there are no-nontrivial rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
            $endgroup$
            – BS.
            Jul 22 at 10:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 22 at 13:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Rot
            Jul 22 at 15:06










          • $begingroup$
            @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 23 at 2:40













          15












          15








          15





          $begingroup$

          No.



          Let us consider some vector bundles over $S^4$. Since $S^4$ is simply connected all vector bundles are oriented and rank $k$ vector bundles over $S^4$ are classified by $pi_3(SO(k))$ by the clutching construction (I am glossing over basepoint issues here, but I think it is correct in this setting). Now $pi_3(SO(1))$ and $ pi_3(SO(2)=pi_3(S^1)$ are trivial groups, so there do not exist non-trivial rank $1$ and rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$. What about rank $3$? Well $SO(3)cong mathbb RP^3$ and the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fiber bundle
          $$
          mathbbZ_2rightarrow S^3rightarrow mathbbRP^3
          $$

          shows that $pi_3(SO(3))congpi_3(mathbbRP^3)cong mathbbZ$. Hence there are $mathbbZ$ different rank $3$ vector bundles over $S^4$.



          Only the trivial one admits a non-zero section. If another one admits a section, then the orthogonal complement (a rank $2$ bundle) must be non-trivial, otherwise the bundle is trivial. But our previous computation shows that there are no-nontrivial rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No.



          Let us consider some vector bundles over $S^4$. Since $S^4$ is simply connected all vector bundles are oriented and rank $k$ vector bundles over $S^4$ are classified by $pi_3(SO(k))$ by the clutching construction (I am glossing over basepoint issues here, but I think it is correct in this setting). Now $pi_3(SO(1))$ and $ pi_3(SO(2)=pi_3(S^1)$ are trivial groups, so there do not exist non-trivial rank $1$ and rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$. What about rank $3$? Well $SO(3)cong mathbb RP^3$ and the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fiber bundle
          $$
          mathbbZ_2rightarrow S^3rightarrow mathbbRP^3
          $$

          shows that $pi_3(SO(3))congpi_3(mathbbRP^3)cong mathbbZ$. Hence there are $mathbbZ$ different rank $3$ vector bundles over $S^4$.



          Only the trivial one admits a non-zero section. If another one admits a section, then the orthogonal complement (a rank $2$ bundle) must be non-trivial, otherwise the bundle is trivial. But our previous computation shows that there are no-nontrivial rank $2$ bundles over $S^4$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 22 at 9:02

























          answered Jul 22 at 8:55









          Thomas RotThomas Rot

          3,6591 gold badge19 silver badges39 bronze badges




          3,6591 gold badge19 silver badges39 bronze badges










          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
            $endgroup$
            – BS.
            Jul 22 at 10:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 22 at 13:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Rot
            Jul 22 at 15:06










          • $begingroup$
            @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 23 at 2:40












          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
            $endgroup$
            – BS.
            Jul 22 at 10:28










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 22 at 13:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Rot
            Jul 22 at 15:06










          • $begingroup$
            @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
            $endgroup$
            – Fredy
            Jul 23 at 2:40







          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
          $endgroup$
          – BS.
          Jul 22 at 10:28




          $begingroup$
          Moreover an important example (often denoted $Lambda^2_+$) of a rank $3$ oriented vector bundle with no non-vanishing section is given by the self-dual $2$-forms on the round sphere $S^4$ (any other conformal structure and orientation would do). The reason is that otherwise $S^4$ would admit an (orthogonal) almost complex structure, hence two, one for each orientation ($S^4$ has an orentation reversing diffeo). Considering their only two (exercise) common tangent complex lines at each point, $TS^4$ would split in two rank $2$ subbundles, which is excluded as in this answer.
          $endgroup$
          – BS.
          Jul 22 at 10:28












          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
          $endgroup$
          – Fredy
          Jul 22 at 13:37




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot, it's wonderful! I conjectured it to be true in order to solve a exercise from Bott/Tu's GTM 82, "the Euler class of an oriented sphere bundle with even-dimensional fibers is zero, when the sphere bundle comes from a vector bundle". I hope to know why this statement turn out to be true.
          $endgroup$
          – Fredy
          Jul 22 at 13:37




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
          $endgroup$
          – Thomas Rot
          Jul 22 at 15:06




          $begingroup$
          @Fredy: Note that the euler class is also zero in this example. But this does not imply that there is a non-zero section.
          $endgroup$
          – Thomas Rot
          Jul 22 at 15:06












          $begingroup$
          @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
          $endgroup$
          – Fredy
          Jul 23 at 2:40




          $begingroup$
          @ThomasRot: Thanks. Can you tell me more details about the proof of that exercise? I seem to lack other tools besides looking for a global section...
          $endgroup$
          – Fredy
          Jul 23 at 2:40

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336716%2foriented-vector-bundle-with-odd-dimensional-fibers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?