Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizevertical aligning images in table with adjustbox only works when not every image is in an adjustboxDraft option with adjustbox packageCentering text in adjustbox minipage with hfillProblem with Tikzpicture and Adjustboxadjustbox with XeLaTeX misplaces hyperlinksadjustbox with equation and tikzpictureAdjustbox, can I move caption with the content using lap?Adjust minipage height with adjustboxUsing adjustbox type functionality with supertabular
What is the hottest thing in the universe?
Some pads on a PCB are marked in clusters and I can't understand which one is which
Suspension compromise for urban use
What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?
Heyawake: An Introductory Puzzle
Can someone with Extra Attack do a Commander Strike BEFORE he throws a net?
How to gracefully leave a company you helped start?
Good textbook for queueing theory and performance modeling
Will some rockets really collapse under their own weight?
Setting up a Mathematical Institute of Refereeing?
What modifiers are added to the attack and damage rolls of this unique longbow from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist?
What should I do if actually I found a serious flaw in someone's PhD thesis and an article derived from that PhD thesis?
Adding things to bunches of things vs multiplication
Number in overlapping range
Why did IBM make the PC BIOS source code public?
Why do so many people play out of turn on the last lead?
Solving pricing problem heuristically in column generation algorithm for VRP
How does the Moon's gravity affect Earth's oceans despite Earth's stronger gravitational pull?
Why do my bicycle brakes get worse and feel more 'squishy" over time?
Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?
What's the relationship betweeen MS-DOS and XENIX?
What allows us to use imaginary numbers?
How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?
Go to last file in vim
Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?
aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizevertical aligning images in table with adjustbox only works when not every image is in an adjustboxDraft option with adjustbox packageCentering text in adjustbox minipage with hfillProblem with Tikzpicture and Adjustboxadjustbox with XeLaTeX misplaces hyperlinksadjustbox with equation and tikzpictureAdjustbox, can I move caption with the content using lap?Adjust minipage height with adjustboxUsing adjustbox type functionality with supertabular
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex
:
Without the raise=-0.3ex
, the item number is not aligned with the text:
Code:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipage[t]linewidth
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
item number to align with the top baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
vertical-alignment adjustbox
add a comment |
The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex
:
Without the raise=-0.3ex
, the item number is not aligned with the text:
Code:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipage[t]linewidth
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
item number to align with the top baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
vertical-alignment adjustbox
add a comment |
The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex
:
Without the raise=-0.3ex
, the item number is not aligned with the text:
Code:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipage[t]linewidth
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
item number to align with the top baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
vertical-alignment adjustbox
The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex
:
Without the raise=-0.3ex
, the item number is not aligned with the text:
Code:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipage[t]linewidth
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
item number to align with the top baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
vertical-alignment adjustbox
vertical-alignment adjustbox
asked Aug 4 at 6:37
Peter GrillPeter Grill
170k26 gold badges454 silver badges774 bronze badges
170k26 gold badges454 silver badges774 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage
environment.
The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a
minipage
, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as(
and)
is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in aminipage
, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicitstrut
. If one inserts astrut
in the first line of thefbox
, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the
fbox
and the material inside theminipage
, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameterfboxrule
; default value:arrayrulewidth
, usually0.4pt
) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value offboxsep
is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following codenewadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
in lieu of
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex
With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
to adjust the item number to align with the top
baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given byfboxrule
, notarrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually:0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)
– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
The option valign=t
of adjustbox
doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t]
option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox
calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t
sets the height to the height of the current strutbox
.
This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.
In my opinion adjustbox
is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox%too high
beginminipage[t]linewidth
aaaa
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
beginminipage[t]linewidth
$intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
endenumerate
enddocument
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502750%2fwhy-adjustbox-needs-a-tweak-of-raise-0-3ex-with-enumitem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage
environment.
The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a
minipage
, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as(
and)
is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in aminipage
, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicitstrut
. If one inserts astrut
in the first line of thefbox
, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the
fbox
and the material inside theminipage
, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameterfboxrule
; default value:arrayrulewidth
, usually0.4pt
) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value offboxsep
is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following codenewadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
in lieu of
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex
With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
to adjust the item number to align with the top
baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given byfboxrule
, notarrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually:0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)
– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage
environment.
The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a
minipage
, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as(
and)
is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in aminipage
, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicitstrut
. If one inserts astrut
in the first line of thefbox
, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the
fbox
and the material inside theminipage
, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameterfboxrule
; default value:arrayrulewidth
, usually0.4pt
) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value offboxsep
is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following codenewadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
in lieu of
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex
With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
to adjust the item number to align with the top
baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given byfboxrule
, notarrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually:0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)
– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage
environment.
The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a
minipage
, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as(
and)
is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in aminipage
, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicitstrut
. If one inserts astrut
in the first line of thefbox
, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the
fbox
and the material inside theminipage
, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameterfboxrule
; default value:arrayrulewidth
, usually0.4pt
) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value offboxsep
is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following codenewadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
in lieu of
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex
With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
to adjust the item number to align with the top
baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage
environment.
The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a
minipage
, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as(
and)
is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in aminipage
, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicitstrut
. If one inserts astrut
in the first line of thefbox
, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the
fbox
and the material inside theminipage
, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameterfboxrule
; default value:arrayrulewidth
, usually0.4pt
) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value offboxsep
is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following codenewadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
in lieu of
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex
With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
fboxsep=0pt
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
to adjust the item number to align with the top
baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument
edited Aug 4 at 9:26
answered Aug 4 at 8:41
MicoMico
302k33 gold badges412 silver badges820 bronze badges
302k33 gold badges412 silver badges820 bronze badges
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given byfboxrule
, notarrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually:0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)
– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given byfboxrule
, notarrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually:0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)
– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by
fboxrule
, not arrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by
fboxrule
, not arrayrulewidth
. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt
) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)– Mico
Aug 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
The option valign=t
of adjustbox
doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t]
option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox
calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t
sets the height to the height of the current strutbox
.
This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.
In my opinion adjustbox
is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox%too high
beginminipage[t]linewidth
aaaa
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
beginminipage[t]linewidth
$intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
endenumerate
enddocument
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
add a comment |
The option valign=t
of adjustbox
doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t]
option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox
calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t
sets the height to the height of the current strutbox
.
This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.
In my opinion adjustbox
is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox%too high
beginminipage[t]linewidth
aaaa
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
beginminipage[t]linewidth
$intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
endenumerate
enddocument
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
add a comment |
The option valign=t
of adjustbox
doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t]
option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox
calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t
sets the height to the height of the current strutbox
.
This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.
In my opinion adjustbox
is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox%too high
beginminipage[t]linewidth
aaaa
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
beginminipage[t]linewidth
$intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
endenumerate
enddocument
The option valign=t
of adjustbox
doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t]
option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox
calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t
sets the height to the height of the current strutbox
.
This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.
In my opinion adjustbox
is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.
documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox
newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t
begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox%too high
beginminipage[t]linewidth
aaaa
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
beginminipage[t]linewidth
$intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
endminipage%
endMyAdjustbox
endenumerate
enddocument
edited Aug 4 at 10:11
answered Aug 4 at 9:51
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
212k9 gold badges320 silver badges720 bronze badges
212k9 gold badges320 silver badges720 bronze badges
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
add a comment |
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
+1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.
– Mico
Aug 4 at 10:04
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?
– Peter Grill
Aug 5 at 5:42
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
Why do you need an additional environment at all?
– Ulrike Fischer
Aug 5 at 7:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502750%2fwhy-adjustbox-needs-a-tweak-of-raise-0-3ex-with-enumitem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown