Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizevertical aligning images in table with adjustbox only works when not every image is in an adjustboxDraft option with adjustbox packageCentering text in adjustbox minipage with hfillProblem with Tikzpicture and Adjustboxadjustbox with XeLaTeX misplaces hyperlinksadjustbox with equation and tikzpictureAdjustbox, can I move caption with the content using lap?Adjust minipage height with adjustboxUsing adjustbox type functionality with supertabular

What is the hottest thing in the universe?

Some pads on a PCB are marked in clusters and I can't understand which one is which

Suspension compromise for urban use

What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?

Heyawake: An Introductory Puzzle

Can someone with Extra Attack do a Commander Strike BEFORE he throws a net?

How to gracefully leave a company you helped start?

Good textbook for queueing theory and performance modeling

Will some rockets really collapse under their own weight?

Setting up a Mathematical Institute of Refereeing?

What modifiers are added to the attack and damage rolls of this unique longbow from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist?

What should I do if actually I found a serious flaw in someone's PhD thesis and an article derived from that PhD thesis?

Adding things to bunches of things vs multiplication

Number in overlapping range

Why did IBM make the PC BIOS source code public?

Why do so many people play out of turn on the last lead?

Solving pricing problem heuristically in column generation algorithm for VRP

How does the Moon's gravity affect Earth's oceans despite Earth's stronger gravitational pull?

Why do my bicycle brakes get worse and feel more 'squishy" over time?

Did Pope Urban II issue the papal bull "terra nullius" in 1095?

What's the relationship betweeen MS-DOS and XENIX?

What allows us to use imaginary numbers?

How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?

Go to last file in vim



Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?


aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizevertical aligning images in table with adjustbox only works when not every image is in an adjustboxDraft option with adjustbox packageCentering text in adjustbox minipage with hfillProblem with Tikzpicture and Adjustboxadjustbox with XeLaTeX misplaces hyperlinksadjustbox with equation and tikzpictureAdjustbox, can I move caption with the content using lap?Adjust minipage height with adjustboxUsing adjustbox type functionality with supertabular






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex:



enter image description here



Without the raise=-0.3ex, the item number is not aligned with the text:



enter image description here



Code:



documentclassarticle
usepackageenumitem
usepackage[export]adjustbox

fboxsep=0pt

newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%

begindocument
beginenumerate
item
beginMyAdjustbox
fbox%
beginminipage[t]linewidth
Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
item number to align with the top baseline.
endminipage%
%
endMyAdjustbox%
endenumerate%
enddocument









share|improve this question






























    7















    The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex:



    enter image description here



    Without the raise=-0.3ex, the item number is not aligned with the text:



    enter image description here



    Code:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageenumitem
    usepackage[export]adjustbox

    fboxsep=0pt

    newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%

    begindocument
    beginenumerate
    item
    beginMyAdjustbox
    fbox%
    beginminipage[t]linewidth
    Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
    item number to align with the top baseline.
    endminipage%
    %
    endMyAdjustbox%
    endenumerate%
    enddocument









    share|improve this question


























      7












      7








      7








      The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex:



      enter image description here



      Without the raise=-0.3ex, the item number is not aligned with the text:



      enter image description here



      Code:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageenumitem
      usepackage[export]adjustbox

      fboxsep=0pt

      newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%

      begindocument
      beginenumerate
      item
      beginMyAdjustbox
      fbox%
      beginminipage[t]linewidth
      Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
      item number to align with the top baseline.
      endminipage%
      %
      endMyAdjustbox%
      endenumerate%
      enddocument









      share|improve this question














      The MWE below yields the desired results. But, is there a better way to get this alignment instead of the raise=-0.3ex:



      enter image description here



      Without the raise=-0.3ex, the item number is not aligned with the text:



      enter image description here



      Code:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageenumitem
      usepackage[export]adjustbox

      fboxsep=0pt

      newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex%

      begindocument
      beginenumerate
      item
      beginMyAdjustbox
      fbox%
      beginminipage[t]linewidth
      Some text that takes up several lines, so we need to adjust the
      item number to align with the top baseline.
      endminipage%
      %
      endMyAdjustbox%
      endenumerate%
      enddocument






      vertical-alignment adjustbox






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 4 at 6:37









      Peter GrillPeter Grill

      170k26 gold badges454 silver badges774 bronze badges




      170k26 gold badges454 silver badges774 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage environment.



          • The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a minipage, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as ( and ) is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in a minipage, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicit strut. If one inserts a strut in the first line of the fbox, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.



          • To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the fbox and the material inside the minipage, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameter fboxrule; default value: arrayrulewidth, usually 0.4pt) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value of fboxsep is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following code



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep


            in lieu of



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex


          With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          fboxsep=0pt

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox
          fbox%
          beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
          Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
          to adjust the item number to align with the top
          baseline.
          endminipage%
          %
          endMyAdjustbox%
          endenumerate%
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer



























          • I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 9:23


















          8














          The option valign=t of adjustbox doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t] option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t sets the height to the height of the current strutbox.



          This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.



          In my opinion adjustbox is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox%too high
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          aaaa
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          $intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          endenumerate
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



























          • +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 10:04











          • So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

            – Peter Grill
            Aug 5 at 5:42











          • Why do you need an additional environment at all?

            – Ulrike Fischer
            Aug 5 at 7:39













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502750%2fwhy-adjustbox-needs-a-tweak-of-raise-0-3ex-with-enumitem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6














          I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage environment.



          • The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a minipage, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as ( and ) is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in a minipage, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicit strut. If one inserts a strut in the first line of the fbox, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.



          • To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the fbox and the material inside the minipage, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameter fboxrule; default value: arrayrulewidth, usually 0.4pt) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value of fboxsep is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following code



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep


            in lieu of



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex


          With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          fboxsep=0pt

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox
          fbox%
          beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
          Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
          to adjust the item number to align with the top
          baseline.
          endminipage%
          %
          endMyAdjustbox%
          endenumerate%
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer



























          • I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 9:23















          6














          I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage environment.



          • The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a minipage, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as ( and ) is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in a minipage, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicit strut. If one inserts a strut in the first line of the fbox, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.



          • To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the fbox and the material inside the minipage, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameter fboxrule; default value: arrayrulewidth, usually 0.4pt) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value of fboxsep is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following code



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep


            in lieu of



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex


          With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          fboxsep=0pt

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox
          fbox%
          beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
          Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
          to adjust the item number to align with the top
          baseline.
          endminipage%
          %
          endMyAdjustbox%
          endenumerate%
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer



























          • I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 9:23













          6












          6








          6







          I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage environment.



          • The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a minipage, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as ( and ) is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in a minipage, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicit strut. If one inserts a strut in the first line of the fbox, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.



          • To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the fbox and the material inside the minipage, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameter fboxrule; default value: arrayrulewidth, usually 0.4pt) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value of fboxsep is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following code



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep


            in lieu of



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex


          With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          fboxsep=0pt

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox
          fbox%
          beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
          Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
          to adjust the item number to align with the top
          baseline.
          endminipage%
          %
          endMyAdjustbox%
          endenumerate%
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer















          I think that there are two separate issues. The main one arises from the use of a minipage environment.



          • The first row in the material inside the fbox has no material taller than uppercase letters. Because that material is encased in a minipage, the unused vertical whitespace needed for symbols such as ( and ) is removed. In contrast, the enumeration symbol is not encased in a minipage, and hence its baseline is chosen without removing the implicit strut. If one inserts a strut in the first line of the fbox, most of the need for vertical adjustment is removed.



          • To fully align the baselines of the "1." particle before the fbox and the material inside the minipage, one also needs to make an adjustment (pun intended) for the thickness of the rule (given by the parameter fboxrule; default value: arrayrulewidth, usually 0.4pt) that surrounds the fbox. And, since the value of fboxsep is nonzero in general, I suggest using the following code



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep


            in lieu of



            newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=-0.3ex


          With these two adjustments (yet another pun -- ouch!), I get this screenshot:



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          fboxsep=0pt

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t, raise=fboxrule+fboxsep

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox
          fbox%
          beginminipagelinewidthstrut%
          Some text that takes up several lines, so we need
          to adjust the item number to align with the top
          baseline.
          endminipage%
          %
          endMyAdjustbox%
          endenumerate%
          enddocument






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 4 at 9:26

























          answered Aug 4 at 8:41









          MicoMico

          302k33 gold badges412 silver badges820 bronze badges




          302k33 gold badges412 silver badges820 bronze badges















          • I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 9:23

















          • I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 9:23
















          I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

          – Mico
          Aug 4 at 9:23





          I just fixed a slight inaccuracy: The width of the rule around an fbox is given by fboxrule, not arrayrulewidth. (The default values of both parameters are the same (usually: 0.4pt) in many (most?) document classes, making it easy to conflate the two.)

          – Mico
          Aug 4 at 9:23













          8














          The option valign=t of adjustbox doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t] option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t sets the height to the height of the current strutbox.



          This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.



          In my opinion adjustbox is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox%too high
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          aaaa
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          $intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          endenumerate
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



























          • +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 10:04











          • So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

            – Peter Grill
            Aug 5 at 5:42











          • Why do you need an additional environment at all?

            – Ulrike Fischer
            Aug 5 at 7:39















          8














          The option valign=t of adjustbox doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t] option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t sets the height to the height of the current strutbox.



          This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.



          In my opinion adjustbox is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox%too high
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          aaaa
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          $intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          endenumerate
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



























          • +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 10:04











          • So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

            – Peter Grill
            Aug 5 at 5:42











          • Why do you need an additional environment at all?

            – Ulrike Fischer
            Aug 5 at 7:39













          8












          8








          8







          The option valign=t of adjustbox doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t] option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t sets the height to the height of the current strutbox.



          This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.



          In my opinion adjustbox is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox%too high
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          aaaa
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          $intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          endenumerate
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          The option valign=t of adjustbox doesn't retrieve the inner top baseline as the [t] option of minipage or tabular do. adjustbox calculates a height which takes the current text font size into account: by default valign=t sets the height to the height of the current strutbox.



          This means that depending on the text on the first line it can be too high or too low relative to the number. You can "repair" the first case with the code from Mico but for the second case there is no easy fix.



          In my opinion adjustbox is the wrong environment for such boxes. It is useful for aligning pictures which have no intrinsic baseline, but not for text boxes.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageenumitem
          usepackage[export]adjustbox

          newadjustboxenvMyAdjustboxvalign=t

          begindocument
          beginenumerate
          item
          beginMyAdjustbox%too high
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          aaaa
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          item beginMyAdjustbox%too low
          beginminipage[t]linewidth
          $intlimits_1^3 f(x) $
          endminipage%
          endMyAdjustbox
          endenumerate
          enddocument


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 4 at 10:11

























          answered Aug 4 at 9:51









          Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer

          212k9 gold badges320 silver badges720 bronze badges




          212k9 gold badges320 silver badges720 bronze badges















          • +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 10:04











          • So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

            – Peter Grill
            Aug 5 at 5:42











          • Why do you need an additional environment at all?

            – Ulrike Fischer
            Aug 5 at 7:39

















          • +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

            – Mico
            Aug 4 at 10:04











          • So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

            – Peter Grill
            Aug 5 at 5:42











          • Why do you need an additional environment at all?

            – Ulrike Fischer
            Aug 5 at 7:39
















          +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

          – Mico
          Aug 4 at 10:04





          +1 . :-) I hadn't even thought of the second case! BTW, I've applied a couple of typo fixes -- feel free to revert.

          – Mico
          Aug 4 at 10:04













          So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

          – Peter Grill
          Aug 5 at 5:42





          So, what is the recommend as the correct environment to use for such alignment issues?

          – Peter Grill
          Aug 5 at 5:42













          Why do you need an additional environment at all?

          – Ulrike Fischer
          Aug 5 at 7:39





          Why do you need an additional environment at all?

          – Ulrike Fischer
          Aug 5 at 7:39

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502750%2fwhy-adjustbox-needs-a-tweak-of-raise-0-3ex-with-enumitem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?