Why the following discrete type system,variable accumulator, is time invariant?Time variant and Time Invariant SystemsSystem Properties; Linear, Causal, Time-Invariant, Stable?How to sketch the following discrete-time signal?Time Variant or Time-Invariant system?Is this system time invariant?Is the system $y(n)=x(n^2)$ time invariant?Why $y[n] = x[-n]$ is not time-invariant?Design a Discrete-Time SystemWhat is the relationship between the discrete time and continuous time variables?Eigen Function of Linear Time Invariant (LTI) System

Suspension compromise for urban use

How can I find files in directories listed in a file?

Word for an event that will likely never happen again

Is it really Security Misconfiguration to show a version number?

What should I do if actually I found a serious flaw in someone's PhD thesis and an article derived from that PhD thesis?

What modifiers are added to the attack and damage rolls of this unique longbow from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist?

How do I ask for 2-3 days per week remote work in a job interview?

Good textbook for queueing theory and performance modeling

How do figure out how powerful I am, when my abilities far exceed my knowledge?

The oceans and the moon

Why does this Jet Provost strikemaster have a textured leading edge?

Sum Square Difference, which way is more Pythonic?

When was "Fredo" an insult to Italian-Americans?

Airline power sockets shut down when I plug my computer in. How can I avoid that?

Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?

How would armour (and combat) change if the fighter didn't need to actually wear it?

Escape Velocity - Won't the orbital path just become larger with higher initial velocity?

How much can I judge a company based on a phone screening?

Are there liquid fueled rocket boosters having coaxial fuel/oxidizer tanks?

Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?

What's the relationship betweeen MS-DOS and XENIX?

How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give up

Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?

Doesn't the speed of light limit imply the same electron can be annihilated twice?



Why the following discrete type system,variable accumulator, is time invariant?


Time variant and Time Invariant SystemsSystem Properties; Linear, Causal, Time-Invariant, Stable?How to sketch the following discrete-time signal?Time Variant or Time-Invariant system?Is this system time invariant?Is the system $y(n)=x(n^2)$ time invariant?Why $y[n] = x[-n]$ is not time-invariant?Design a Discrete-Time SystemWhat is the relationship between the discrete time and continuous time variables?Eigen Function of Linear Time Invariant (LTI) System






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


$y[n]=Tx[n]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k]$



it is some sort of moving summer which computes $n^textth$ output sample by adding all samples lying within length $n_0$ around some point $n$ on $k$ -axis (where k is dummy variable) so even if we shift input by amount $n_0$ the length of interval of summation remain unchanged which is same as if we're shifting output by $n_0$ from which it follows system is Time invariant but how do we prove it mathematically .



my work so far



shifting input by $n_0$ , i.e, $Tx[n-n_0]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-n_0]$



now, $kto k+n_0$ then,



LHS$=displaystylesum_k=n-2n_0^n x[k]neq y[n-n_0]$



here i'm getting the answer Time variant. can anyone help ?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$


    $y[n]=Tx[n]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k]$



    it is some sort of moving summer which computes $n^textth$ output sample by adding all samples lying within length $n_0$ around some point $n$ on $k$ -axis (where k is dummy variable) so even if we shift input by amount $n_0$ the length of interval of summation remain unchanged which is same as if we're shifting output by $n_0$ from which it follows system is Time invariant but how do we prove it mathematically .



    my work so far



    shifting input by $n_0$ , i.e, $Tx[n-n_0]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-n_0]$



    now, $kto k+n_0$ then,



    LHS$=displaystylesum_k=n-2n_0^n x[k]neq y[n-n_0]$



    here i'm getting the answer Time variant. can anyone help ?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      1












      1








      1


      2



      $begingroup$


      $y[n]=Tx[n]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k]$



      it is some sort of moving summer which computes $n^textth$ output sample by adding all samples lying within length $n_0$ around some point $n$ on $k$ -axis (where k is dummy variable) so even if we shift input by amount $n_0$ the length of interval of summation remain unchanged which is same as if we're shifting output by $n_0$ from which it follows system is Time invariant but how do we prove it mathematically .



      my work so far



      shifting input by $n_0$ , i.e, $Tx[n-n_0]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-n_0]$



      now, $kto k+n_0$ then,



      LHS$=displaystylesum_k=n-2n_0^n x[k]neq y[n-n_0]$



      here i'm getting the answer Time variant. can anyone help ?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      $y[n]=Tx[n]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k]$



      it is some sort of moving summer which computes $n^textth$ output sample by adding all samples lying within length $n_0$ around some point $n$ on $k$ -axis (where k is dummy variable) so even if we shift input by amount $n_0$ the length of interval of summation remain unchanged which is same as if we're shifting output by $n_0$ from which it follows system is Time invariant but how do we prove it mathematically .



      my work so far



      shifting input by $n_0$ , i.e, $Tx[n-n_0]=displaystylesum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-n_0]$



      now, $kto k+n_0$ then,



      LHS$=displaystylesum_k=n-2n_0^n x[k]neq y[n-n_0]$



      here i'm getting the answer Time variant. can anyone help ?







      discrete-signals linear-systems time-domain






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Aug 4 at 7:44







      Faraday Pathak

















      asked Aug 3 at 20:33









      Faraday PathakFaraday Pathak

      18710 bronze badges




      18710 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overloading the symbol $n$ which doesn't mean the same everywhere in your calculations. Instead, write down what the sequence of input values is and the corresponding sequence of output values when the input is $x$. DO NOT use the symbol $n$ anywhere ($n_0$ is OK to use). So, your answer should look like



          beginalign
          y[-2] &= cdots\
          y[-1] &= cdots\
          y[0] &= x[-n_0] + x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0]\
          y[1] &= x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0+1]
          endalign

          etc.



          Now, shift $x$ by $k$ places (say $k=1$ for starters) and call the result $hat x$. Repeat the above computation for the input $hat x$ and call the result $hat y$. Is $hat y$ the same as $y$ except shifted by $k$ places? Repeat for $k+1$ etc until you have managed to convince yourself that regardless of what $k$ you choose, shifting $x$ by $k$ places results in $y$ also shifting by $k$ places.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            +1 you are amazing
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:42


















          2












          $begingroup$

          In addition to Dilip's hands on answer, let me correct the theoretical path that you wanted to follow but failed.



          The input output relation of the system is given by :



          $$ y[n] = T x[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k] tag1$$



          First, shift the input $x[n]$, by integer $d$, denoted as
          $$x_d[n] = x[n-d] tag2$$
          and see its effect on the output $y[n]$; denoted as $y_d[n]$ :



          $$ y_d[n] = Tx_d[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x_d[k] tag3 $$



          Replace $x_d[n]$ with $x[n-d]$ and $x_d[k]$ with $x[k-d]$ according to Eq.2.
          $$ y_d[n] = Tx[n-d] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] tag4 $$



          Second, shift the output $y[n]$ by $d$ and see its effect on the sum:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_k=n-d-n_0^n-d+n_0 x[k] tag5 $$



          Now, make a manipulation of dummy summation index $k$ in either of Eqs. 4 or 5 to see that they are the same; i.e.,



          For example, let $m = k+d$ and place it into Eq.5:
          $$y[n-d] = sum_ m = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[m-d] tag6 $$



          and simply reset the dummy variable of summation from $m$ back to $k$ in Eq.6, to convince yourself that Eq.6 becomes Eq.4:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_ k = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] = y_d[n] tag7 $$



          Finally, Eq.7 declares that $y[n-d] = y_d[n]$; the system is Time-Invariant.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:41














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "295"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59898%2fwhy-the-following-discrete-type-system-variable-accumulator-is-time-invariant%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overloading the symbol $n$ which doesn't mean the same everywhere in your calculations. Instead, write down what the sequence of input values is and the corresponding sequence of output values when the input is $x$. DO NOT use the symbol $n$ anywhere ($n_0$ is OK to use). So, your answer should look like



          beginalign
          y[-2] &= cdots\
          y[-1] &= cdots\
          y[0] &= x[-n_0] + x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0]\
          y[1] &= x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0+1]
          endalign

          etc.



          Now, shift $x$ by $k$ places (say $k=1$ for starters) and call the result $hat x$. Repeat the above computation for the input $hat x$ and call the result $hat y$. Is $hat y$ the same as $y$ except shifted by $k$ places? Repeat for $k+1$ etc until you have managed to convince yourself that regardless of what $k$ you choose, shifting $x$ by $k$ places results in $y$ also shifting by $k$ places.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            +1 you are amazing
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:42















          2












          $begingroup$

          You are overloading the symbol $n$ which doesn't mean the same everywhere in your calculations. Instead, write down what the sequence of input values is and the corresponding sequence of output values when the input is $x$. DO NOT use the symbol $n$ anywhere ($n_0$ is OK to use). So, your answer should look like



          beginalign
          y[-2] &= cdots\
          y[-1] &= cdots\
          y[0] &= x[-n_0] + x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0]\
          y[1] &= x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0+1]
          endalign

          etc.



          Now, shift $x$ by $k$ places (say $k=1$ for starters) and call the result $hat x$. Repeat the above computation for the input $hat x$ and call the result $hat y$. Is $hat y$ the same as $y$ except shifted by $k$ places? Repeat for $k+1$ etc until you have managed to convince yourself that regardless of what $k$ you choose, shifting $x$ by $k$ places results in $y$ also shifting by $k$ places.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            +1 you are amazing
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:42













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          You are overloading the symbol $n$ which doesn't mean the same everywhere in your calculations. Instead, write down what the sequence of input values is and the corresponding sequence of output values when the input is $x$. DO NOT use the symbol $n$ anywhere ($n_0$ is OK to use). So, your answer should look like



          beginalign
          y[-2] &= cdots\
          y[-1] &= cdots\
          y[0] &= x[-n_0] + x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0]\
          y[1] &= x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0+1]
          endalign

          etc.



          Now, shift $x$ by $k$ places (say $k=1$ for starters) and call the result $hat x$. Repeat the above computation for the input $hat x$ and call the result $hat y$. Is $hat y$ the same as $y$ except shifted by $k$ places? Repeat for $k+1$ etc until you have managed to convince yourself that regardless of what $k$ you choose, shifting $x$ by $k$ places results in $y$ also shifting by $k$ places.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You are overloading the symbol $n$ which doesn't mean the same everywhere in your calculations. Instead, write down what the sequence of input values is and the corresponding sequence of output values when the input is $x$. DO NOT use the symbol $n$ anywhere ($n_0$ is OK to use). So, your answer should look like



          beginalign
          y[-2] &= cdots\
          y[-1] &= cdots\
          y[0] &= x[-n_0] + x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0]\
          y[1] &= x[-n_0+1] + cdots + x[0] + x[1] + cdots x[n_0+1]
          endalign

          etc.



          Now, shift $x$ by $k$ places (say $k=1$ for starters) and call the result $hat x$. Repeat the above computation for the input $hat x$ and call the result $hat y$. Is $hat y$ the same as $y$ except shifted by $k$ places? Repeat for $k+1$ etc until you have managed to convince yourself that regardless of what $k$ you choose, shifting $x$ by $k$ places results in $y$ also shifting by $k$ places.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 3 at 21:17









          Dilip SarwateDilip Sarwate

          14.3k1 gold badge26 silver badges64 bronze badges




          14.3k1 gold badge26 silver badges64 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            +1 you are amazing
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:42
















          • $begingroup$
            +1 you are amazing
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:42















          $begingroup$
          +1 you are amazing
          $endgroup$
          – Faraday Pathak
          Aug 4 at 7:42




          $begingroup$
          +1 you are amazing
          $endgroup$
          – Faraday Pathak
          Aug 4 at 7:42













          2












          $begingroup$

          In addition to Dilip's hands on answer, let me correct the theoretical path that you wanted to follow but failed.



          The input output relation of the system is given by :



          $$ y[n] = T x[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k] tag1$$



          First, shift the input $x[n]$, by integer $d$, denoted as
          $$x_d[n] = x[n-d] tag2$$
          and see its effect on the output $y[n]$; denoted as $y_d[n]$ :



          $$ y_d[n] = Tx_d[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x_d[k] tag3 $$



          Replace $x_d[n]$ with $x[n-d]$ and $x_d[k]$ with $x[k-d]$ according to Eq.2.
          $$ y_d[n] = Tx[n-d] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] tag4 $$



          Second, shift the output $y[n]$ by $d$ and see its effect on the sum:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_k=n-d-n_0^n-d+n_0 x[k] tag5 $$



          Now, make a manipulation of dummy summation index $k$ in either of Eqs. 4 or 5 to see that they are the same; i.e.,



          For example, let $m = k+d$ and place it into Eq.5:
          $$y[n-d] = sum_ m = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[m-d] tag6 $$



          and simply reset the dummy variable of summation from $m$ back to $k$ in Eq.6, to convince yourself that Eq.6 becomes Eq.4:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_ k = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] = y_d[n] tag7 $$



          Finally, Eq.7 declares that $y[n-d] = y_d[n]$; the system is Time-Invariant.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:41
















          2












          $begingroup$

          In addition to Dilip's hands on answer, let me correct the theoretical path that you wanted to follow but failed.



          The input output relation of the system is given by :



          $$ y[n] = T x[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k] tag1$$



          First, shift the input $x[n]$, by integer $d$, denoted as
          $$x_d[n] = x[n-d] tag2$$
          and see its effect on the output $y[n]$; denoted as $y_d[n]$ :



          $$ y_d[n] = Tx_d[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x_d[k] tag3 $$



          Replace $x_d[n]$ with $x[n-d]$ and $x_d[k]$ with $x[k-d]$ according to Eq.2.
          $$ y_d[n] = Tx[n-d] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] tag4 $$



          Second, shift the output $y[n]$ by $d$ and see its effect on the sum:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_k=n-d-n_0^n-d+n_0 x[k] tag5 $$



          Now, make a manipulation of dummy summation index $k$ in either of Eqs. 4 or 5 to see that they are the same; i.e.,



          For example, let $m = k+d$ and place it into Eq.5:
          $$y[n-d] = sum_ m = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[m-d] tag6 $$



          and simply reset the dummy variable of summation from $m$ back to $k$ in Eq.6, to convince yourself that Eq.6 becomes Eq.4:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_ k = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] = y_d[n] tag7 $$



          Finally, Eq.7 declares that $y[n-d] = y_d[n]$; the system is Time-Invariant.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:41














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          In addition to Dilip's hands on answer, let me correct the theoretical path that you wanted to follow but failed.



          The input output relation of the system is given by :



          $$ y[n] = T x[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k] tag1$$



          First, shift the input $x[n]$, by integer $d$, denoted as
          $$x_d[n] = x[n-d] tag2$$
          and see its effect on the output $y[n]$; denoted as $y_d[n]$ :



          $$ y_d[n] = Tx_d[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x_d[k] tag3 $$



          Replace $x_d[n]$ with $x[n-d]$ and $x_d[k]$ with $x[k-d]$ according to Eq.2.
          $$ y_d[n] = Tx[n-d] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] tag4 $$



          Second, shift the output $y[n]$ by $d$ and see its effect on the sum:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_k=n-d-n_0^n-d+n_0 x[k] tag5 $$



          Now, make a manipulation of dummy summation index $k$ in either of Eqs. 4 or 5 to see that they are the same; i.e.,



          For example, let $m = k+d$ and place it into Eq.5:
          $$y[n-d] = sum_ m = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[m-d] tag6 $$



          and simply reset the dummy variable of summation from $m$ back to $k$ in Eq.6, to convince yourself that Eq.6 becomes Eq.4:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_ k = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] = y_d[n] tag7 $$



          Finally, Eq.7 declares that $y[n-d] = y_d[n]$; the system is Time-Invariant.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In addition to Dilip's hands on answer, let me correct the theoretical path that you wanted to follow but failed.



          The input output relation of the system is given by :



          $$ y[n] = T x[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k] tag1$$



          First, shift the input $x[n]$, by integer $d$, denoted as
          $$x_d[n] = x[n-d] tag2$$
          and see its effect on the output $y[n]$; denoted as $y_d[n]$ :



          $$ y_d[n] = Tx_d[n] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x_d[k] tag3 $$



          Replace $x_d[n]$ with $x[n-d]$ and $x_d[k]$ with $x[k-d]$ according to Eq.2.
          $$ y_d[n] = Tx[n-d] = sum_k=n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] tag4 $$



          Second, shift the output $y[n]$ by $d$ and see its effect on the sum:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_k=n-d-n_0^n-d+n_0 x[k] tag5 $$



          Now, make a manipulation of dummy summation index $k$ in either of Eqs. 4 or 5 to see that they are the same; i.e.,



          For example, let $m = k+d$ and place it into Eq.5:
          $$y[n-d] = sum_ m = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[m-d] tag6 $$



          and simply reset the dummy variable of summation from $m$ back to $k$ in Eq.6, to convince yourself that Eq.6 becomes Eq.4:



          $$y[n-d] = sum_ k = n-n_0^n+n_0 x[k-d] = y_d[n] tag7 $$



          Finally, Eq.7 declares that $y[n-d] = y_d[n]$; the system is Time-Invariant.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 3 at 23:38









          Fat32Fat32

          17.6k3 gold badges14 silver badges34 bronze badges




          17.6k3 gold badges14 silver badges34 bronze badges










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:41













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
            $endgroup$
            – Faraday Pathak
            Aug 4 at 7:41








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
          $endgroup$
          – Faraday Pathak
          Aug 4 at 7:41





          $begingroup$
          +1 nice finish .i mistook dummy variable for $n_0$. Your style matches with 'Oppenheim's DSP book'
          $endgroup$
          – Faraday Pathak
          Aug 4 at 7:41


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Signal Processing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59898%2fwhy-the-following-discrete-type-system-variable-accumulator-is-time-invariant%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?